Lorentz invariance violation and its role in Quantum Gravity phenomenology
Open accessAbstract
Introduction Although there is enormous uncertainty about the nature of Quantum Gravity (QG), one thing is quite certain: the commonly used ideas of space and time should break down at or before the Planck length is reached. For example, elementary scattering processes with a Planck-sized center-of-mass energy create large enough quantum fluctuations in the gravitational field that space-time can no longer be treated as a classical continuum. It is then natural to question the exactness of the Lorentz invariance (LI) that is pervasive in all more macroscopic theories. Exact LI requires that an object can be arbitrarily boosted. Since the corresponding Lorentz contractions involve arbitrarily small distances, there is an obvious tension with the expected breakdown of classical space-time at the Planck length. Indeed, quite general arguments are made that lead to violations of LI within the two most popular approaches towards QG: string theory and loop quantum gravity This has given added impetus to the established line of research dedicated to the investigation of ways in which fundamental symmetries, like LI or CPT, could be broken. It was realized that extremely precise tests could be made with a sensitivity appropriate to certain order of magnitude estimates of violations of LI.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
This Euclidean example does not answer the question for the physical Lorentzian theory.
“This example is interesting but unfortunately does not provide an answer to the question for the physical Lorentzian theory (see discussion in [114] and more recently [308]).”
From The Spin-Foam Approach to Quantum Gravity (2013) · cites this paper as [114]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
The Emperor's New Mind: Concerning Computers, Minds, and The Laws of Physics
Penrose, R., & Gardner, M. (1989) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198519737.001.0001 · Cited by 2,007 · see citing works
The Quantum Theory of Fields, Vol. 2 : Modern Applications
Weinberg, S. (2001) · Cited by 552 · see citing works
TASI Lectures on Effective Field TheoriesPreprint
Rothstein, I. Z. (2003) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.hep-ph/0308266 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Impossible Measurements on Quantum Fields
Sorkin, R. D. (1956) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511524653.024 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
PERSPECTIVES ON QUANTUM GRAVITY PHENOMENOLOGY
Sudarsky, D. (2005) · International Journal of Modern Physics D · doi:10.1142/s0218271805008145 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [17]17. J.C. Collins, Renormalization (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1984). - J. Collins, A. Perez, D. Sudarsky, L. Urrutia & H. Vucetich, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 , 191301 (2004). - A. Corichi & D. Sudarsky, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 14 , 1685 (2005).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Spin-Foam Approach to Quantum Gravity
Perez, A. (2013) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2013-3 · Cited by 677 · see citing works
- Authors
- Collins, J., Perez, A., & Sudarsky, D.
- Affiliations
- Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (MX)
- Venue
- Approaches to Quantum Gravity
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2009-03-05
- Pages
- 528-547
- OpenAlex
- W1491932262
- Cited by
- 39
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 7.18
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
- Keywords
- Lorentz violation, quantum gravity phenomenology, Planck length, string theory, loop quantum gravity, CPT symmetry, quantum fluctuations of spacetime
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review