Cited by 26Soviet and Russian HistoryPolitical Conflict and GovernanceRussia and Soviet political economy

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Presidential Decree Authority in Russia, 1991–95

Parrish, Scott·1998·Executive Decree Authority

Abstract

INTRODUCTION Since the introduction of an independently elected president in Russia in May 1991, presidential decrees have played a central role in the political development of the country. Under both constitutions in effect since the collapse of the Soviet Union, the president has been granted significant Constitutional Decree Authority (CDA), and in the First Russian Republic (1991–93), the assembly delegated sweeping powers to President Boris Yeltsin. The nature and extent of presidential decree authority and the political and institutional context in which it was exercised, however, varied considerably between the two post–Soviet Russian republics. Russia thus provides valuable opportunities for examining the origins and the exercise of both constitutional and delegated presidential decree authority. The role of presidential decrees in the development of Russian democracy has been highly controversial. President Yeltsin's use of decrees has often been termed “autocratic” (Wishnevsky 1992, 1993b), although some Western analysts have seen Russia as a paradigmatic case of “delegative democracy,” in which the president rules by decree and thus usurps or at least marginalizes the powers and function of the assembly (Kubicek 1994; Linz 1994; O'Donnell 1994; Roeder 1994). Such a democracy, these critics hold, is less representative of the popular will than one in which an assembly plays a major role, and it is also more prone to breakdown. Russia, they argue, because of its staggering geographic, economic, cultural, and religious diversity, is particularly ill-suited for this form of rule, which may undermine Russia's nascent democratic institutions.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/cbo9780511609305.004

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Parrish, S.
Corresponding author
Parrish, Scott
Venue
Executive Decree Authority
Published
1998-05-13
Pages
62-103
OpenAlex
W2493937549
Cited by
26
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
6.55
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Soviet and Russian History
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Russia and Soviet political economy
Keywords
presidential decree, Boris Yeltsin, Russian presidency, delegative democracy, authoritarian regimes, executive-legislative relations, Russian Constitution of 1993, post-Soviet Russia, democratic transition, executive power

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review