The DOI matches its Crossref record.
On technological expectations
Abstract
One of the most important unresolved issues in the theory of the firm and in the understanding of productivity growth is the rate at which new and improved technologies are adopted. I will argue that expectations concerning the future course of technological innovation are a significant and neglected component of these issues, inasmuch as they are an important determinant of entrepreneurial decisions with respect to the adoption of innovations. Recent work in various aspects of economic theory and measurement has pointed, once again, to the important role played by expectations of future change in influencing the behavior of economic agents. In a number of instances the expectation of future changes has led to quite different patterns of behavior than might have been expected to have taken place if it had been anticipated that no changes in level and/or trend would occur. What would appear to be aberrational or irrational behavior on the basis of such expectations of no changes is often fully explained once allowance is made for a different set of expectations about the future. In this paper I should like to draw a similar analogy for the study of the diffusion of technological innovations. The timing and nature of the adoption decision on the part of individual business firms is a key question with major implications for both the micro and macro levels of analysis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The sociology of expectations in science and technology
Borup, M., Brown, N., Konrad, K., & Van Lente, H. (2006) · Technology Analysis & Strategic Management · doi:10.1080/09537320600777002 · Cited by 1,902
The adoption of agricultural innovations
Feder, G., & Umali, D. L. (1993) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/0040-1625(93)90053-a · Cited by 963
The illusory diffusion of innovation: An examination of assimilation gaps
Fichman, R. G., & Kemerer, C. F. (1999) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.10.3.255 · Cited by 633
Coordinating and competing in ecosystems: How organizational forms shape new technology investments
Kapoor, R., & Lee, J. M. (2013) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.2010 · Cited by 502
What we should know about knowledge-intensive business services
Muller, E., & Doloreux, D. (2009) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2008.10.001 · Cited by 485
Metadata
- Venue
- Inside the Black Box
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 1983-01-28
- Pages
- 104-119
- OpenAlex
- W2969217906
- Cited by
- 176
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.07
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On technological expectations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/cbo9780511611940.006
- The paper
- On technological expectations. (1983). Inside the Black Box. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511611940.006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.