The DOI matches its Crossref record; 234 of the 234 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Architecture of Government: Rethinking Political Decentralization
Abstract
Since the days of Montesquieu and Jefferson, political decentralization has been seen as a force for better government and economic performance. It is thought to bring government 'closer to the people', nurture civic virtue, protect liberty, exploit local information, stimulate policy innovation, and alleviate ethnic tensions. Inspired by such arguments, and generously funded by the major development agencies, countries across the globe have been racing to devolve power to local governments. This book re-examines the arguments that underlie the modern faith in decentralization. Using logical analysis and formal modeling, and appealing to numerous examples, it shows that most are based on vague intuitions or partial views that do not withstand scrutiny. A review of empirical studies of decentralization finds these as inconclusive and mutually contradictory as the theories they set out to test.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Coase, R. H. (1937) · Economica · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0335.1937.tb00002.x · Cited by 23,972
An Economic Theory of Democracy.
Banfield, E. C., & Downs, A. (1958) · Midwest Journal of Political Science · doi:10.2307/2109186 · Cited by 18,594
A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures
Tiebout, C. M. (1956) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/257839 · Cited by 13,222
POLANYI, M. (1997) · Knowledge in Organisations · doi:10.1016/b978-0-7506-9718-7.50010-x · Cited by 12,408
The Logic of Collective Action.
Golembiewski, R. T., & Olson, M. (1966) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2091298 · Cited by 11,364
The Pure Theory of Public Expenditure
Samuelson, P. A. (1954) · The Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.2307/1925895 · Cited by 7,458
The Use of Knowledge in Society
HAYEK, F. (1996) · Knowledge Management and Organisational Design · doi:10.1016/b978-0-7506-9749-1.50005-3 · Cited by 6,434
De Tocqueville, A. (2010) · The Two Narratives of Political Economy · doi:10.1002/9781118011690.ch12 · Cited by 6,286
Hotelling, H. (1990) · The Collected Economics Articles of Harold Hotelling · doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-8905-7_4 · Cited by 5,677
A Rational Theory of the Size of Government
Meltzer, A. H., & Richard, S. F. (1981) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/261013 · Cited by 5,485
Cited by
On the impact of demographic change on economic growth and poverty
Cruz, M., & Ahmed, S. A. (2018) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.12.018 · Cited by 186
Decentralisation and conflict in Uganda
Green, E. D. (2008) · Conflict, Security & Development · doi:10.1080/14678800802539317 · Cited by 105
How Insurgency Begins: Rebel Group Formation in Uganda and Beyond
Lewis, J. I. (2020) · doi:10.1017/9781108855969 · Cited by 98
Decentralization and Development in Contemporary Uganda
Green, E. (2015) · Regional & Federal Studies · doi:10.1080/13597566.2015.1114925 · Cited by 55
Axelsen, H., Jensen, J., & Ross, O. (2022) · Complex Systems Informatics and Modeling Quarterly · doi:10.7250/csimq.2022-31.04 · Cited by 41
Metadata
- Authors
- Treisman, D.
- Venue
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2007-07-02
- OpenAlex
- W1545739069
- Cited by
- 800
- References
- 234
- FWCI
- 49.75
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Architecture of Government: Rethinking Political Decentralization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/cbo9780511619151
- The paper
- Treisman, D. (2007). The Architecture of Government: Rethinking Political Decentralization. Cambridge University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511619151
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.