How Insurgency Begins: Rebel Group Formation in Uganda and Beyond
Abstract
How and why do rebel groups initially form? Prevailing scholarship has attributed the emergence of armed rebellion to the explosion of pre-mobilized political or ethnic hostilities. However, this book finds both uncertainty and secrecy shrouding the start of insurgency in weak states. Examining why only some incipient armed rebellions succeed in becoming viable challengers to governments, How Insurgency Begins shows that rumors circulating in places where rebel groups form can influence civilians' perceptions of both rebels and the state. By revealing the connections between villagers' trusted network structures and local ethnic demography, Janet I. Lewis shows how ethnic networks facilitate the spread of pro-rebel rumors. This in-depth analysis of conflicts in Uganda and neighbouring states speaks to scholars and policymakers seeking to understand the motives and actions of those initiating armed rebellion, those witnessing the process in their community, and those trying to stop it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Research on rebellion makes similar claims: the within-network spread of information and resources is thought to be critical.
“Research on rebellion, another form of collective action in which dissidents seek policy or regime change, makes similar claims.The within-network spread of information and resources-such as through dense quotidian ties and homogenous ethnic networks-is thought to be critical(Lewis 2020;Parkinson 2013).”
From Coordinated Dis-Coordination (2024) · cites this paper as Lewis 2020
Cites
Armed Conflict 1946-2001: A New Dataset
GLEDITSCH, N. P., WALLENSTEEN, P., ERIKSSON, M., SOLLENBERG, M., & STRAND, H. (2002) · Journal of Peace Research · doi:10.1177/0022343302039005007 · Cited by 3,846 · see citing works
Boix, C. (2003) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511804960 · Cited by 2,211 · see citing works
Introducing ACLED: An armed conflict location and event dataset
Raleigh, C., Linke, A., Hegre, H., & Karlsen, J. (2010) · Journal of Peace Research · doi:10.1177/0022343310378914 · Cited by 1,747 · see citing works
Insurgent Collective Action and Civil War in El Salvador
Wood, E. J. (2003) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808685 · Cited by 1,644 · see citing works
State Repression and Political Order
Davenport, C. (2007) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.101405.143216 · Cited by 1,564 · see citing works
Institutions and Ethnic Politics in Africa
Posner, D. N. (2005) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808661 · Cited by 1,113 · see citing works
Horizontal Inequalities and Ethnonationalist Civil War: A Global Comparison
CEDERMAN, L.-E., WEIDMANN, N. B., & GLEDITSCH, K. S. (2011) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055411000207 · Cited by 1,028 · see citing works
KALYVAS, S. N., & BALCELLS, L. (2010) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055410000286 · Cited by 858 · see citing works
Does Conflict Beget Conflict? Explaining Recurring Civil War
Walter, B. F. (2004) · Journal of Peace Research · doi:10.1177/0022343304043775 · Cited by 690 · see citing works
The Strategy of Paired Comparison: Toward a Theory of Practice
Tarrow, S. (2010) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0010414009350044 · Cited by 597 · see citing works
State Repression and the Domestic Democratic Peace
Davenport, C. (2007) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511510021 · Cited by 549 · see citing works
Colonialism and Postcolonial Development: Spanish America in Comparative Perspective
Mahoney, J. (2010) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511750328 · Cited by 364 · see citing works
Africa uprising: Popular protest and political change
Branch, A., & Mampilly, Z. (2015) · doi:10.5040/9781350218116 · Cited by 300 · see citing works
Skeletons in the Closet: Transitional Justice in Post-Communist Europe
Nalepa, M. (2010) · Cambridge University Press · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815362 · Cited by 222 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Large-N Qualitative Analysis (LNQA): Causal Generalization in Case Study and Multimethod Research
Goertz, G., & Haggard, S. (2023) · Perspectives on Politics · doi:10.1017/s1537592723002037 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
“In a well-crafted study of civil con fl ict in Africa, for example, Lewis (2020) explores all proto-rebel groups in Uganda, an N of 16.”
BackgroundHASSAN, M. (2024) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055423000291 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
- Authors
- Lewis, J. I.
- Affiliations
- George Washington University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Lewis, Janet I.
- ORCID
- Lewis, Janet I.
- Venue
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2020-09-18
- OpenAlex
- W3088529139
- Cited by
- 98
- References
- 14
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 4
- FWCI
- 15.56
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Military History and Strategy
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Peacebuilding and International Security
- Keywords
- armed insurgency, rumors, rumor propagation, ethnic networks, social networks, weak states, ethnic demography, Uganda
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review