The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Independent Component Analysis: Principles and Practice
Abstract
Independent Component Analysis (ICA) has recently become an important tool for modelling and understanding empirical datasets. It is a method of separating out independent sources from linearly mixed data, and belongs to the class of general linear models. ICA provides a better decomposition than other well-known models such as principal component analysis. This self-contained book contains a structured series of edited papers by leading researchers in the field, including an extensive introduction to ICA. The major theoretical bases are reviewed from a modern perspective, current developments are surveyed and many case studies of applications are described in detail. The latter include biomedical examples, signal and image denoising and mobile communications. ICA is discussed in the framework of general linear models, but also in comparison with other paradigms such as neural network and graphical modelling methods. The book is ideal for researchers and graduate students in the field.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data Via the EM Algorithm
Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1977.tb01600.x · Cited by 50,444
Quinlan, J. R. (1986) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00116251 · Cited by 21,439
Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition
Bishop, C. M. (1995) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198538493.001.0001 · Cited by 12,287
An Information-Maximization Approach to Blind Separation and Blind Deconvolution
Bell, A. J., & Sejnowski, T. J. (1995) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1995.7.6.1129 · Cited by 8,986
Emergence of simple-cell receptive field properties by learning a sparse code for natural images
Olshausen, B. A., & Field, D. J. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/381607a0 · Cited by 5,694
Sparse coding with an overcomplete basis set: A strategy employed by V1?
Olshausen, B. A., & Field, D. J. (1997) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/s0042-6989(97)00169-7 · Cited by 3,642
Differential-Geometrical Methods in Statistics
Amari, S.-I. (1985) · Lecture Notes in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-5056-2 · Cited by 1,673
Huber, P. J. (1985) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1176349519 · Cited by 1,277
Cited by
Deep learning in neural networks: an overview
Schmidhuber, J. (2015) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2014.09.003 · Cited by 18,570
Kraskov, A., Stögbauer, H., & Grassberger, P. (2004) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.69.066138 · Cited by 3,512
A promoter-level mammalian expression atlas
The FANTOM Consortium and the RIKEN PMI and CLST (DGT) (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13182 · Cited by 1,982
Statistical process monitoring with independent component analysis
Lee, J.-M., Yoo, C., & Lee, I.-B. (2004) · Journal of Process Control · doi:10.1016/j.jprocont.2003.09.004 · Cited by 746
Nonnegative Matrix Factorization: An Analytical and Interpretive Tool in Computational Biology
Devarajan, K. (2008) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000029 · Cited by 454
Metadata
- Venue
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2001-03-01
- OpenAlex
- W4211083646
- Cited by
- 1,917
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 13.23
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Independent Component Analysis: Principles and Practice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/cbo9780511624148
- The paper
- Independent Component Analysis: Principles and Practice. (2001). Cambridge University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511624148
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.