Cited by 454Gene expression and cancer classificationBioinformatics and Genomic NetworksFace and Expression Recognition

Nonnegative Matrix Factorization: An Analytical and Interpretive Tool in Computational Biology

Open access
Devarajan, Karthik·2008·PLoS Computational Biology

Abstract

In the last decade, advances in high-throughput technologies such as DNA microarrays have made it possible to simultaneously measure the expression levels of tens of thousands of genes and proteins. This has resulted in large amounts of biological data requiring analysis and interpretation. Nonnegative matrix factorization (NMF) was introduced as an unsupervised, parts-based learning paradigm involving the decomposition of a nonnegative matrix V into two nonnegative matrices, W and H, via a multiplicative updates algorithm. In the context of a pxn gene expression matrix V consisting of observations on p genes from n samples, each column of W defines a metagene, and each column of H represents the metagene expression pattern of the corresponding sample. NMF has been primarily applied in an unsupervised setting in image and natural language processing. More recently, it has been successfully utilized in a variety of applications in computational biology. Examples include molecular pattern discovery, class comparison and prediction, cross-platform and cross-species analysis, functional characterization of genes and biomedical informatics. In this paper, we review this method as a data analytical and interpretive tool in computational biology with an emphasis on these applications.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000029

Cites

75 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • We previously identified three robust and reproducible transcriptomic sub-groups of KRAS-mutant LUAD by applying non-negative matrix factorization consensus clustering to RNASeq data from 68 tumors from TCGA.

    “We previously identified three robust and reproducible transcriptomic sub-groups of KRAS-mutant LUAD by applying non-negative matrix factorization consensus clustering81–83 to RNASeq data from 68 tumors from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) dataset67.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. [2]Lee DD Seung SH 2001 Algorithms for nonnegative matrix factorization. Adv Neural Inform Process Syst 13 556 562
  2. [10]Feng T Li S-Z Shum H-Y Zhang H-Y 2001 Local nonnegative matrix factorization as a visual representation. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Development and Learning 178 183 2nd International Conference on Development and Learning; Cambridge, Massachusetts
  3. [21]Pauca P Shahnaz F Berry M Plemmons R 2004 Text mining using nonnegative matrix factorizations. In: Proceedings of the Fourth SIAM International Conference on Data Mining. Fourth SIAM International Conference on Data Mining; 22–24 April 2004, Lake Buena Vista, Florida
  4. [23]Hoyer PO 2002 Nonnegative sparse coding. Neural Networks for Signal Processing XII 557–565. IEEE Workshop on Neural Networks for Signal Processing; 4–6 September 2002; Martigny, Switzerland
  5. [34]Cooper M Foote J 2002 Summarizing video using nonnegative similarity matrix factorization. Proceedings of the IEEE Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing 25 28 IEEE Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing; 9–11 December 2002; St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands
  6. [37]Devarajan K 2006 Nonnegative matrix factorization—A new paradigm for large-scale biological data analysis. In: Proceedings of the Joint Statistical Meetings. Joint Statistical Meetings; 6–10 August 2006; Seattle, Washington
  7. [39]Devarajan K Ebrahimi N 2005 Molecular pattern discovery using non-negative matrix factorization based on Renyi's information measure. In: Proceedings of the XII SCMA International Conference; 2–4 December 2005; Auburn, Alabama. Available at: http://atlas-conferences.com/c/a/q/t/98.htm. Accessed June 24, 2008
  8. [52]Costanzo MC Crawford ME Hirschman JE Kranz KE Olsen P 2001 YPD, PombePD and WormPD: Model organism volumes of the BioKnowledge library, an integrated resource for protein information. Nucleic Acids Res 29 75 79 11125054 PMC29810
  9. [65]Nandigam R Chuaqui C Singh J Kim S 2006 W-Sift, a structural interactions based potency-wise screening technique for protein-small molecule complexes. In: Proceedings of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers Annual Meeting. American Institute of Chemical Engineers Annual Meeting; 12–17 November 2006; San Francisco, California.
  10. [66]Chuaqui C Nandigam R Singh J Deng Z 2006 A position specific interaction-based scoring technique for virtual screening. In: Proceedings of The Computers in Chemistry Division, American Chemical Society Meeting, 10–14 September 2006; San Francisco, California 19415918
  11. [71]Devarajan K Wang G 2007 Parallel implementation of non-negative matrix algorithms using high-performance computing cluster. In: Proceedings of the 39th Symposium on the Interface: Computing Science and Statistics. Theme: Systems Biology. 39th Symposium on the Interface: Computing Science and Statistics; 23–26 May 2007; Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Available: http://sbm.temple.edu/interface07/documents/Interface07InvitedProgram_Revised.pdf. Accessed June 24, 2008.
  12. [72]Okun O Priisalu H 2005 Nonnegative matrix factorization for pattern recognition. Proceedings of the 5th IASTED International Conference on Visualization, Imaging and Image Processing 546 551 5th IASTED International Conference on Visualization, Imaging and Image Processing; 7–9 September 2005; Benidorm, Spain

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Devarajan, K.
Affiliations
Fox Chase Cancer Center (US)
Corresponding author
Devarajan, Karthik
Venue
PLoS Computational Biology
Published
2008-07-25
Volume
4
Issue
7
Pages
e1000029
ISSN
  • 1553-734X (ISSN-L)
  • 1553-7358
OpenAlex
W2132692097
Cited by
454
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 35 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 20
FWCI
1.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS Computational Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Pennsylvania Department of Health
  • National Institutes of Health (CA-06927)
  • National Cancer Institute (P30CA006927)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face and Expression Recognition
Keywords
non-negative matrix factorization, metagenes, gene expression data, DNA microarrays, unsupervised learning, cross-platform analysis, cross-species comparison, biomedical informatics
MeSH terms
Artificial Intelligence, Pattern Recognition, Automated, Systems Integration, Computational Biology, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis, Gene Expression Profiling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review