The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Impact of the International Economy on National Policies: An Analytical Overview
Abstract
By virtually any measure, cross-border trade and investment have grown at extraordinary rates over the past thirty years. Representative trade statistics for the industrial economies and the newly industrializing countries (NICs) are presented by Milner and Keohane in the Introduction to this volume. Among the poorest states, as well (the forty-three countries that the World Bank classifies as “low-income,” with per capita GNP of $610 or less in 1990), merchandise exports grew on average by 5.2 percent annually between 1965 and 1990 (computed from World Bank 1992: table 14). Cross-national flows of capital, as Milner and Keohane also indicate, increased even more sharply, roughly quintupling among the industrialized countries and doubling among the developing states in the single decade between the mid-1970s and the mid-1980s. Increases of these magnitudes in international transactions – or more precisely, as we argue below, the exogenous easing of international exchange that such flows reflect – have affected domestic politics in virtually every country. Some of the ways in which they have done so are obvious, for example, controversies over trade agreements, common markets, non-tariff barriers, migration, and investment. Other impacts are less obvious but perhaps even more profound, including widespread repudiation of tax, regulatory, and macroeconomic policies that inhibit international competitiveness. This chapter attempts to elucidate how economic integration affects domestic politics, policies, and institutions by using international trade theories to generate testable propositions about the preferences of important groups within societies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Social Protection and the Formation of Skills: A Reinterpretation of the Welfare State
Estevez‐Abe, M., Iversen, T., & Soskice, D. (2001) · Varieties of Capitalism · doi:10.1093/0199247757.003.0004 · Cited by 1,568
Globalization, the welfare state and right-wing populism in Western Europe
Swank, D. (2003) · Socio-Economic Review · doi:10.1093/soceco/1.2.215 · Cited by 622
Inclusion without Influence? NGOs in European Trade Policy
DÜR, A., & DE BIÈVRE, D. (2007) · Journal of Public Policy · doi:10.1017/s0143814x0700061x · Cited by 313
The Rise of Artificial Intelligence under the Lens of Sustainability
Khakurel, J., Penzenstadler, B., Porras, J., Knutas, A., & Zhang, W. (2018) · Technologies · doi:10.3390/technologies6040100 · Cited by 187
“[93] state, “National policies, especially of large countries, affect the international economy in important ways” (p.”
BackgroundRealist avenues to global International Relations
Foulon, M., & Meibauer, G. (2020) · European Journal of International Relations · doi:10.1177/1354066120926706 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Frieden, J. A., & Rogowski, R.
- Venue
- Internationalization and Domestic Politics
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 1996-04-26
- Pages
- 25-47
- OpenAlex
- W2990577972
- Cited by
- 689
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 94.58
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Impact of the International Economy on National Policies: An Analytical Overview. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/cbo9780511664168.003
- The paper
- Frieden, J. A., & Rogowski, R. (1996). The Impact of the International Economy on National Policies: An Analytical Overview. Internationalization and Domestic Politics. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511664168.003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.