The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Inclusion without Influence? NGOs in European Trade Policy
Abstract
The actions of nongovernmental organisations (NGOs) concerned with such issues as development, human rights, and the protection of the environment voicing concerns to public authorities raises the questions: Do these newly mobilised societal actors influence EU trade policy outcomes? We answer in the negative, arguing that such groups, which have diffuse costs and benefits from trade policies, do not dispose of resources with which they can threaten or enhance political actors' chances of re-election or re-appointment. A survey of NGOs and business groups as well as two in-depth case studies on the negotiations concerning the EU's Economic Partnership Agreements and the EU's policy on access to medicines in developing countries support our reasoning. The analysis shows that although NGOs have gained access to policy-makers, they have largely failed to shift policy outcomes in their favour.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Logic of Collective Action.
Golembiewski, R. T., & Olson, M. (1966) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2091298 · Cited by 11,364
Lobbying as Legislative Subsidy
HALL, R. L., & DEARDORFF, A. V. (2006) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055406062010 · Cited by 1,172
The Impact of the International Economy on National Policies: An Analytical Overview
Frieden, J. A., & Rogowski, R. (1996) · Internationalization and Domestic Politics · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511664168.003 · Cited by 689
Outside Lobbying: Public Opinion and Interest Group Strategies
Weller, M., & Kollman, K. (1999) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2655584 · Cited by 490
An Information Rationale for the Power of Special Interests
Lohmann, S. (1998) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/2586305 · Cited by 230
Hammersley, M., Gomm, R., & Foster, P. (2009) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9780857024367.d17 · Cited by 187
Mahoney, C. (2004) · European Union Politics · doi:10.1177/1465116504047312 · Cited by 184
Constituency Interests and Delegation in European and American Trade Policy
Biévre, D. D., & Dür, A. (2005) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0010414005277578 · Cited by 152
Self-citationCivil Society and Legitimate European Governance
(2006) · Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks · doi:10.4337/9781847200198 · Cited by 142
Quiet Influence: The Representation of Diffuse Interests on Trade Policy, 1983-94
Bailey, M. A. (2001) · Legislative Studies Quarterly · doi:10.2307/440403 · Cited by 91
Cited by
The EU-Japan free trade agreement in evolving global trade politics
Yoshimatsu, H. (2020) · Asia Europe Journal · doi:10.1007/s10308-019-00545-3 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- DÜR, A., & DE BIÈVRE, D.
- Venue
- Journal of Public Policy
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2007-01-18
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 79-101
- ISSN
- 0143-814X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7815
- OpenAlex
- W2055840857
- Cited by
- 313
- References
- 14
- FWCI
- 60.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Inclusion without Influence? NGOs in European Trade Policy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0143814x0700061x
- The paper
- DÜR, A., & DE BIÈVRE, D. (2007). Inclusion without Influence? NGOs in European Trade Policy. Journal of Public Policy. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0143814x0700061x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.