Cited by 4,020International Relations and Foreign PolicyWorld Systems and Global TransformationsPolitical Science Research and Education

War and Change in World Politics

Gilpin, Robert·1981·Cambridge University Press eBooks

Abstract

War and Change in World Politics introduces the reader to an important new theory of international political change. Arguing that the fundamental nature of international relations has not changed over the millennia, Professor Gilpin uses history, sociology, and economic theory to identify the forces causing change in the world order. The discussion focuses on the differential growth of power in the international system and the result of this unevenness. A shift in the balance of power - economic or military - weakens the foundations of the existing system, because those gaining power see the increasing benefits and the decreasing cost of changing the system. The result, maintains Gilpin, is that actors seek to alter the system through territorial, political, or economic expansion until the marginal costs of continuing change are greater than the marginal benefits. When states develop the power to change the system according to their interests they will strive to do so- either by increasing economic efficiency and maximizing mutual gain, or by redistributing wealth and power in their own favour.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/cbo9780511664267

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Waltz's Theory of International Politics (1979) and Gilpin's War and Change in World Politics (1981) were a revenge of realism, an attempt to relaunch more scientific versions of realism.

    “As often noted, Waltz's Theory of International Politics (1979) and Gilpin's War and Change in World Politics (1981) were the revenge of realism, an attempt to relaunch more scientific' versions of realism.”

    From The rise and fall of the inter-paradigm debate (1996) · cites this paper as Gilpin, 1981

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gilpin, R.
Corresponding author
Gilpin, Robert
Venue
Cambridge University Press eBooks
Published
1981-10-30
OpenAlex
W2150515448
Cited by
4,020
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 179 · 2025: 190 · 2024: 172 · 2023: 131 · 2022: 117 · 2021: 143 · 2020: 195 · 2019: 214 · 2018: 182 · 2017: 135 · 2016: 130 · 2015: 102 · 2014: 144 · 2013: 141 · 2012: 129
FWCI
102.01
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • Virtual Defense Library (Ministerio de Defensa) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Relations and Foreign Policy
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › World Systems and Global Transformations
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Science Research and Education
Keywords
balance of power, international order, power growth, war, international relations theory, economic power, military power, territorial expansion, power redistribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review