Cited by 208Writing and Handwriting EducationArtistic and Creative ResearchAcademic Writing and Publishing

The Writing Process and Process Writing

Seow, Anthony·2002·Methodology in Language Teaching

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/cbo9780511667190.044

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Seow, A.
Corresponding author
Seow, Anthony
Venue
Methodology in Language Teaching
Published
2002-04-08
Pages
315-320
OpenAlex
W1896553990
Cited by
208
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.42
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Writing and Handwriting Education
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Artistic and Creative Research
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Academic Writing and Publishing
Keywords
writing process, process writing, composition, writing instruction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review