Awareness and identification of self
Abstract
The higher-order thought (HOT) theory holds that a state's being conscious consists in one's having a suitable thought that one is, oneself, in that state. The HOT theory explains not only how we are aware of our conscious mental states, but also how it is that we are thereby aware of ourselves. This chapter shows how HOTs can accommodate essentially indexical awareness of oneself without invoking any special, antecedent self-awareness. It argues that a crucial assumption that underlies the claim of immunity to error through misidentification is unfounded, namely, the assumption that no self-identification figures in our awareness of our own conscious states. Finally, the chapter discusses the particular kind of identification of self that figures in our higher-order awareness of our conscious states and how that relates to the self-identification that underlies our first-person thoughts generally.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In traditional HOT, the self is implied to be represented by the reference to 'I' but this representation is not of the conscious self and can be implicit or nonconscious.
“However, this representation is not of the conscious self (113) and can be construed as being implicit or nonconscious (134).”
From A higher-order theory of emotional consciousness (2017) · cites this paper as [134]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
Cited by 41
- Authors
- Rosenthal, D.
- Corresponding author
- Rosenthal, David
- ORCID
- Rosenthal, David
- Venue
- Consciousness and the Self
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2011-11-17
- Pages
- 22-50
- OpenAlex
- W133766127
- Cited by
- 41
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 6.74
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
- Keywords
- higher-order thought theory, self-awareness, self-identification, immunity to error through misidentification, first-person thought
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review