The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Educational technology
Abstract
The language laboratory A number of institutions have language laboratories which are under-used. This is wasteful of an excellent resource that can be used either for group sessions or for self-access/library-mode purposes. Apart from the array of listening/speaking material available commercially, other material can be developed to provide a bank of EGAP/ESAP cassettes, worksheets and folders (see Chapter 18). The material would need to be divided into categories : e.g. pronunciation, stress and intonation listening and reading listening and speaking listening and comprehension (with some writing) listening and note-taking grammar EGAP ESAP (various subjects) and levels (perhaps colour-coded for easy recognition): e.g. a elementary b lower intermediate c upper intermediate d advanced Students need guidance in using the language laboratory in order to obtain the maximum benefit. This is, perhaps, best achieved by an introductory, practical session, combined with printed advice to act as a reminder, an example of which is given below. WORKING IN THE LANGUAGE LABORATORY Use the language laboratory for about 30 minutes at a time. It is difficult to work in a concentrated way for longer, so take a short break after half-an-hour. Procedure for using a tape-course: REMEMBER – Most courses are designed to give practice in listening and speaking (with very little reading). – If you look at the book all the time while listening to the tape, you are really practising reading – and this will defeat the purpose of the course. […]
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006) · Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x · Cited by 12,604
A history of instructional design and technology: Part II: A history of instructional design
Reiser, R. A. (2001) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/bf02504928 · Cited by 607
From Edutainment to Serious Games: A Change in the Use of Game Characteristics
Charsky, D. (2010) · Games and Culture · doi:10.1177/1555412009354727 · Cited by 458
WALLACE, R. M. (2003) · Education, Communication & Information · doi:10.1080/14636310303143 · Cited by 405
Doering, A., Veletsianos, G., Scharber, C., & Miller, C. (2009) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.2190/ec.41.3.d · Cited by 257
Metadata
- Venue
- English for Academic Purposes
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 1997-02-13
- Pages
- 350-358
- OpenAlex
- W1587514990
- Cited by
- 516
- References
- 0
- Type
- other
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Educational technology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/cbo9780511733062.023
- The paper
- Educational technology. (1997). English for Academic Purposes. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511733062.023
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.