Cited by 2,809Foucault, Power, and EthicsSocial and Cultural StudiesPsychoanalysis and Social Critique

Inventing our Selves: Psychology, Power, and Personhood

Rose, Nikolas·1996·Cambridge University Press eBooks

Abstract

Inventing Our Selves proposes a radical new approach to the analysis of our current regime of the self, and the values of autonomy, identity, individuality, liberty, and choice that animate it. It argues that psychology, psychiatry, psychotherapy and other 'psy' disciplines have played a key role in 'inventing our selves', changing the ways in which human beings understand and act upon themselves, and how they are acted upon by politicians, managers, doctors, therapists, and a multitude of other authorities. These mutations are intrinsically linked to recent changes in ways of understanding and exercising political power, which have stressed the values of autonomy, personal responsibility, and choice. This critical history diagnoses and destabilises our contemporary 'condition' of the self, to help us think differently about the kind of persons we are, or might become.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/cbo9780511752179

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Resources for addressing such processes lie in the literature on selfhood: phenomenological accounts emphasizing pre-reflective self-presence, narrative theories conceptualizing selfhood through autobiographical reasoning, and Foucauldian approaches highlighting how discursive regimes structure self-interpretation.

    “Resources for addressing such processes lie in the literature on selfhood: phenomenological accounts emphasizing pre-reflective self-presence [33], narrative theories conceptualizing selfhood through autobiographical reasoning [34], and Foucauldian approaches highlighting how discursive regimes structure self-interpretation [35].”
  • Contemporary technologies of the self operate within neoliberal governmentality, where individuals are constituted as entrepreneurs of themselves responsible for continuous self-optimization.

    “Contemporary technologies of the self operate within neoliberal governmentality, where individuals are constituted as entrepreneurs of themselves responsible for continuous self-optimization [35].”
  • Frameworks attending to only one dimension of ChatGPT's role - as narrative co-author or as technology of self-governance - will miss the other.

    “When ChatGPT functions as both narrative co-author and technology of self-governance-participating in autobiographical reasoning whilst embedding practices of self-care within optimization discourses [35] frameworks attending to only one dimension will miss the other.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rose, N.
Affiliations
King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Rose, Nikolas
Venue
Cambridge University Press eBooks
Published
1996-07-13
OpenAlex
W1992329812
Cited by
2,809
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 70 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 57 · 2023: 93 · 2022: 64 · 2021: 74 · 2020: 103 · 2019: 181 · 2018: 124 · 2017: 110 · 2016: 131 · 2015: 139 · 2014: 175 · 2013: 137 · 2012: 164
FWCI
33.44
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Foucault, Power, and Ethics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Cultural Studies
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Psychoanalysis and Social Critique
Keywords
self, autonomy, identity, individuality, freedom, choice, personal responsibility, psychotherapy, psychiatry, psychology, political power, history of the self, personhood

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review