Cited by 289Psychoanalysis and Social CritiquePsychoanalysis, Philosophy, and PoliticsPosthumanist Ethics and Activism

Creating Subjectivities

Open access
Blackman, Lisa, Cromby, John, Hook, Derek, Papadopoulos, Dimitris, Walkerdine, Valerie·2008·Subjectivity

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1057/sub.2008.8

Cites

130 of 130 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This embodied subjectivity is constituted intersubjectively, intercorporeally, in the interactions between the brothers, and in the way that these interactions are embedded in familial and cultural contexts that entrench perceptions of masculinity as macho-ess.

    “This embodied subjectivity is constituted intersubjectively, intercorporeally (Blackman et al., 2008;Ugazio, 2013), in the interactions between the brothers, and in the way that these interactions are embedded in turn within familial and cultural contexts that entrench perceptions of masculinity as macho-ess.”

    From Children’s embodied experience of living with domestic violence: “I’d go into my panic, and shake, really bad” (2016) · cites this paper as Blackman et al., 2008

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

23 of the 153 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. Althusser, L. (1971). Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses. In Brewster, B. (ed.) Lenin and Philosophy. London: New Left Books, pp. 127-186.
  2. Benjamin, W. (1996). Selected Writings Vol. 1: 1913-1926. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  3. Bradley, B. (1989). Visions of Infancy. Oxford: Polity Press/Blackwells.
  4. Braun, V. (2000). Conceptualising the Body. Feminism and Psychology, 10, pp. 511-518.
  5. Braverman, H. (1974). Labour and Monopoly Capital. New York: Monthly Review Press.
  6. Brennan, T. (2004). The Transmission of Affect. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  7. Deleuze, G. (1990). Negotiations. 1972-1990. New York: Columbia University Press.
  8. Fanon, F. (1967). Black Skin, White Masks. New York: Grove Press.
  9. Hall, S. and Jefferson, T. (1989). Resistance through Rituals: Youth Subcultures in Postwar Britain. London and New York: Routledge.
  10. Haraway, D.J. (1997). Modest_Witness@Second_Millennium. FemaleMan c _Meets_ OncoMouset: Feminism and Technoscience. New York: Routledge.
  11. Holzkamp, K. (1995). Kolonisierung der Kindheit. Psychologische und psychoanalytische Entwicklungserkla ¨rungen. Forum Kritische Psychologie, 35, pp. 109-131.
  12. Lacan, J. (1977). The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis. London: Hogarth Press/Penguin.
  13. Luhmann, N. (1985). Die Autopoiesis des Bewusstseins. Soziale Welt, 36, pp. 402-446.
  14. Nightingale, D.J. (1999). Bodies: Reading the Body. In Parker I. and The Bolton Discourse Network (eds) Critical Textworks. Buckingham: Open University Press, pp. 167-177.
  15. Panksepp, J. (2004). Emotional Consciousness: Animalian Sources of Affective Values and the Core Self. Paper presented at the Science, Self and Meaning conference (annual conference of the Consciousness and Experiential Psychology Section of the British Psychological Society), Oxford.
  16. Rancie `re, J. (1998). Disagreement: Politics and Philosophy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  17. Richardson, K. (2000). The Making of Intelligence. New York/Chichester: Columbia University Press.
  18. Rose, S., Lewontin, R. and Kamin, I. (1984). Not in Our Genes. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
  19. Schmitz, H. (2002). Die Gegenwart. In Gutmann, M., Hartmann, D., Weingarten, M. and Zitterbarth, W. (eds) Kultur -Handlung -Wissenschaft: fu ¨r Peter Janich. Weilerswist: Velbru ¨ck Wissenschaft, pp. 27-42.
  20. Simondon, G. (1992). The Genesis of the Individual. In Crary, J. and Kwinter, S. (eds) Incorporations. New York, NY: Zone, pp. 297-319.
  21. Skeggs, B. (2004). Class, Self and Culture. London and New York: Routledge.
  22. Teilhard de Chardin, P. (1999). The Human Phenomenon. Brighton: Sussex Academic Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Blackman, L., Cromby, J., Hook, D., Papadopoulos, D., & Walkerdine, V.
Venue
Subjectivity
Published
2008-05
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
1-27
ISSN
  • 1755-6341 (ISSN-L)
  • 1755-635X
OpenAlex
W1511242669
Cited by
289
References
153
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Subjectivity (publishedVersion)
  • BIROn (Birkbeck, University of London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Psychoanalysis and Social Critique
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis, Philosophy, and Politics
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
Keywords
production of subjectivity, human experience, social change, interdisciplinary research, social theory, psychoanalysis, postcolonialism, feminism, gender studies, cultural studies, humanities and social sciences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review