The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Absorption of radiation by canopies and stand growth
Abstract
Growth analysis – old and new When a canopy of leaves is sunlit, photosynthesis proceeds at a rate which depends on how photons are distributed over individual elements of the foliage and on the relationship between photosynthetic rate and irradiance for each foliage element. In principle, therefore, photosynthesis by a canopy, expressed per unit of ground area rather than per unit leaf area, can be estimated from a statistical description of irradiance as a function of leaf disposition. In many models of productivity, this is a central and complex component. In practice, however, modelling can often be greatly simplified with little sacrifice of precision by exploiting the observation that, at least during vegetative growth, uniform stands produce dry matter at a rate which is almost proportional to the amount of radiant energy intercepted by the canopy. In this chapter we consider the theoretical basis of this relationship, its experimental verification, and its usefulness for exploring the dependence of growth on environmental variables in general. Traditional growth analysis is based on the observation that, when single plants are exposed to a more or less constant environment, their rate of growth is approximately proportional to their weight and to their leaf area until a significant fraction of older foliage is shaded by younger foliage. Consequently, relative growth rate (RGR) and net assimilation rate (NAR) are conservative indices of growth initially.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Primary production of the biosphere: Integrating terrestrial and oceanic components
Field, C. B., Behrenfeld, M. J., Randerson, J. T., & Falkowski, P. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.281.5374.237 · Cited by 6,371
Global net primary production: Combining ecology and remote sensing
Field, C. B., Randerson, J. T., & Malmström, C. M. (1995) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/0034-4257(94)00066-v · Cited by 1,256
(2005) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781420027877 · Cited by 834
Yuan, W., Liu, S., Zhou, G., Zhou, G., Tieszen, L. L., Baldocchi, D., Bernhofer, C., Gholz, H., Goldstein, A. H., Goulden, M. L., et al. (2007) · Agricultural and Forest Meteorology · doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2006.12.001 · Cited by 787
A General Model for the Light-Use Efficiency of Primary Production
Haxeltine, A., & Prentice, I. C. (1996) · Functional Ecology · doi:10.2307/2390165 · Cited by 441
Metadata
- Authors
- Russell, G., Jarvis, P. G., & Monteith, J. L.
- Venue
- Plant Canopies
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 1989-03-16
- Pages
- 21-40
- OpenAlex
- W2990009991
- Cited by
- 339
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 23.36
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Absorption of radiation by canopies and stand growth. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/cbo9780511752308.003
- The paper
- Russell, G., Jarvis, P. G., & Monteith, J. L. (1989). Absorption of radiation by canopies and stand growth. Plant Canopies. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511752308.003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.