The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A General Model for the Light-Use Efficiency of Primary Production
Abstract
1. Net primary production (NPP) by terrestrial ecosystems appears to be proportional to absorbed photosynthetically active radiation (APAR) on a seasonal and annual basis. This observation has been used in 'diagnostic' models that estimate NPP from remotely sensed vegetation indices. In 'prognostic' process-based models carbon fluxes are more commonly integrated with respect to leaf area index assuming invariant leaf photosynthetic parameters. This approach does not lead to a proportional relationship between NPP and APAR. However, leaf nitrogen content and Rubisco activity are known to vary seasonally and with canopy position, and there is evidence that this variation takes place in such a way as to nearly optimize total canopy net photosynthesis. 2. Using standard formulations for the instantaneous response of leaf net photosynthesis to APAR, we show that the optimized canopy net photosynthesis is proportional to APAR. This theory leads to reasonable values for the maximum (unstressed) light-use efficiency of gross and net primary production of C-3 plants at current ambient CO2, comparable with empirical estimates for agricultural crops and forest plantations. 3. By relating the standard formulations to the Collatz-Farquhar model of photosynthesis, we show that a range of observed physiological responses to temperature and CO2 can be understood as consequences of the optimization. These responses include the CO2 fertilization response and stomatal closure in C-3 plants, the increase of leaf N concentration with decreasing growing season temperature, and the downward acclimation of leaf respiration and N content with increasing ambient CO2. The theory provides a way to integrate diverse experimental observations into a general framework for modelling terrestrial primary production.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species
Farquhar, G. D., von Caemmerer, S., & Berry, J. A. (1980) · Planta · doi:10.1007/bf00386231 · Cited by 8,796
Climate and the efficiency of crop production in Britain
Monteith, J. L. (1977) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1977.0140 · Cited by 3,484
Photosynthesis and nitrogen relationships in leaves of C3 plants
Evans, J. R. (1989) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/bf00377192 · Cited by 3,400
Larcher, W. (1980) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-96545-6 · Cited by 3,038
Terrestrial ecosystem production: A process model based on global satellite and surface data
Potter, C. S., Randerson, J. T., Field, C. B., Matson, P. A., Vitousek, P. M., Mooney, H. A., & Klooster, S. A. (1993) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1029/93gb02725 · Cited by 2,986
Solar Radiation and Productivity in Tropical Ecosystems
Monteith, J. L. (1972) · The Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.2307/2401901 · Cited by 2,724
Canopy reflectance, photosynthesis and transpiration
SELLERS, P. J. (1985) · International Journal of Remote Sensing · doi:10.1080/01431168508948283 · Cited by 2,278
Collatz, G. J., Ball, J. T., Grivet, C., & Berry, J. A. (1991) · Agricultural and Forest Meteorology · doi:10.1016/0168-1923(91)90002-8 · Cited by 2,270
Comparative photosynthesis of sun and shade plants
Boardman, N. K. (1977) · Annual Review of Plant Physiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.pp.28.060177.002035 · Cited by 1,826 · cited 1×
“species (Bbhning & Burnside 1956; Hozumi & Kirita 1970; Boardman 1977; Larcher 1983; Ellsworth & Reich 1993).”
BackgroundAdaptation to Sun and Shade: a Whole-Plant Perspective
Givnish, T. (1988) · Australian Journal of Plant Physiology · doi:10.1071/pp9880063 · Cited by 1,787
Cited by
Joos, F., Roth, R., Fuglestvedt, J. S., Peters, G. P., Enting, I. G., von Bloh, W., Brovkin, V., Burke, E. J., Eby, M., Edwards, N. R., et al. (2013) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-13-2793-2013 · Cited by 839
REICHSTEIN, M., CIAIS, P., PAPALE, D., VALENTINI, R., RUNNING, S., VIOVY, N., CRAMER, W., GRANIER, A., OGÉE, J., ALLARD, V., et al. (2007) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01224.x · Cited by 580
Toward more realistic projections of soil carbon dynamics by Earth system models
Luo, Y., Ahlström, A., Allison, S. D., Batjes, N. H., Brovkin, V., Carvalhais, N., Chappell, A., Ciais, P., Davidson, E. A., Finzi, A., et al. (2016) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1002/2015gb005239 · Cited by 533
Recent pause in the growth rate of atmospheric CO2 due to enhanced terrestrial carbon uptake
Keenan, T. F., Prentice, I. C., Canadell, J. G., Williams, C. A., Wang, H., Raupach, M., & Collatz, G. J. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms13428 · Cited by 474
Self-citationLPJmL4 – a dynamic global vegetation model with managed land – Part 1: Model description
(2018) · doi:10.5194/gmd-11-1343-2018 · Cited by 333
Metadata
- Authors
- Haxeltine, A., & Prentice, I. C.
- Venue
- Functional Ecology
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1996-10
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 551
- ISSN
- 0269-8463 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1980853261
- Cited by
- 441
- References
- 51
- FWCI
- 14.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A General Model for the Light-Use Efficiency of Primary Production. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/2390165
- The paper
- Haxeltine, A., & Prentice, I. C. (1996). A General Model for the Light-Use Efficiency of Primary Production. Functional Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/2390165
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.