The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Origins of domain specificity: The evolution of functional organization
Abstract
By establishing that domain-specific machinery is necessary to explain human cognitive performance, psychologists who advocate modular or domain-specific approaches have found themselves in an unanticipated situation. Metaphorically speaking, it is as if they had laboriously built a road up one side of a nearly impassable mountain range into unexplored terrain, only to find themselves met at the top by a foreign road construction crew – evolutionary functionalist researchers – who had been building a road upward to the same destination from the far side of the mountains. Quite unexpectedly, cognitive psychologists find their field intimately connected to a whole new intellectual landscape that had previously seemed remote, unfamiliar, and all but irrelevant. Yet the proliferating connections tying together the cognitive and evolutionary communities promise to transform both fields, with each supplying necessary principles, methods, and a species of rigor that the other lacks. Although the sudden conjunction of these two communities has led to the customary level of mutual misunderstanding, the long-run significance of these developments is unmistakable. From this emerging integrated perspective, the domain-specific mechanisms or modules cognitive psychologists have been studying can be readily recognized for what they are – evolved adaptations, produced by the evolutionary process acting on our hunter-gatherer ancestors (Cosmides & Tooby, 1987). Natural selection and ancestral environments Viewed from a more encompassing scientific framework, the confluence of these two research communities seems inevitable (Tooby & Cosmides, 1992). The human brain did not fall out of the sky, an inscrutable artifact of unknown origin, and there is no longer any sensible reason for studying it in ignorance of the causal processes that constructed it.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Our findings suggest that the effect of social and ecological complexity may be limited to influencing more specialized, and potentially domain-specific forms of cognition (188-196).”
From The evolution of self-control. (2014) · cites this paper as [193]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 701–800 of 839
Fixed-Parameter Tractable Time
van Rooij, I., Blokpoel, M., Kwisthout, J., & Wareham, T. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781107358331.008
Carruthers, P., Stich, S., & Siegal, M. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511613517.001
(2001) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511606847.001
Wilson, R. A. (2001) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511606847.015
van Rooij, I., Blokpoel, M., Kwisthout, J., & Wareham, T. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781107358331.006
van Rooij, I., Blokpoel, M., Kwisthout, J., & Wareham, T. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781107358331.009
van Rooij, I., Blokpoel, M., Kwisthout, J., & Wareham, T. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781107358331.021
van Rooij, I., Blokpoel, M., Kwisthout, J., & Wareham, T. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781107358331.016
van Rooij, I., Blokpoel, M., Kwisthout, J., & Wareham, T. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781107358331.002
Coherence as Constraint Satisfaction
van Rooij, I., Blokpoel, M., Kwisthout, J., & Wareham, T. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781107358331.015
van Rooij, I., Blokpoel, M., Kwisthout, J., & Wareham, T. (2019) · doi:10.1017/9781107358331.001
van Rooij, I., Blokpoel, M., Kwisthout, J., & Wareham, T. (2019) · doi:10.1017/9781107358331.018
Cognitive adaptations in two sympatric mouse lemur species occupying different ecological niches
der Malsburg, J. H. (2021) · eDiss (Georg-August-Universität Göttingen) · doi:10.53846/goediss-8948
Fatima, S. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-19650-3_2133
A kiterjedt elme hipotézis és lehetséges elágazásai
Herczegh, M. (2019) · doi:10.14232/phd.10318
Piro, M. C. (2017) · doi:10.35537/10915/65268
Machery, É. (2011) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/obo/9780195396577-0150
Andreas, H. (2020) · Synthese Library/Synthese library · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-36233-1_1
Goswami, U. (2002) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470996652.refs
Descola, P. (2015) · Gallimard eBooks · doi:10.3917/gall.desco.2015.01.0733
Clément, F. (2006) · Travaux de sciences sociales · doi:10.3917/droz.cleme.2006.01.0341
Holub, A. M. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-19650-3_1255
Sacred Technologies: the Evolution of Religious Cognitive Niche
Murphy, D. J. (2009) · doi:10.26686/wgtn.16967245
Holub, A. M. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_1255-1
Gigerenzer, G. (2002) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195153729.003.0014
Pyysiäinen, I. (2009) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195380026.003.0001
Fatima, S. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_2133-1
van Rooij, I., Blokpoel, M., Kwisthout, J., & Wareham, T. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781107358331.022
Abbott, B. (2014) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199697960.013.004
Az evolúciós pszichológia paradigma újragondolása: A továbblépés irányai
Szabó, L., & Bereczkei, T. (2022) · Magyar Pszichológiai Szemle · doi:10.1556/0016.2022.00031
Implicit Person Memory: Domain-General and Domain-Specific Processes of Learning and Change 1
Kurdi, B., & Banaji, M. R. (2022) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003045687-25 · Cited by 6
Evolved Psychological Mechanisms
Starratt, V. G. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24612-3_1633
(2002) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195153729.002.0004
(2002) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195153729.002.0006
(2002) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195153729.002.0005
Carta, S. M., & Alcaro, A. (2022) · STUDI JUNGHIANI · doi:10.3280/jun55-2022oa14057
(2009) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195380026.002.0005
(2009) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195380026.001.0001.002.002
(2009) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195380026.005.0001
(2009) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195380026.002.0006
(2009) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195380026.001.0001.002.007
(2009) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195380026.001.0001.002.006
(2009) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195380026.001.0001.002.001
(2009) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195380026.001.0001.002.003
(2009) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195380026.001.0001.002.004
(2009) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195380026.002.0003
(2009) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195380026.001.0001.002.005
A Cognitive-Functionalist Interpretation of Modularity
Al-bajjari, I. F. H. (2020) · Journal of Tikrit University for Humanities · doi:10.25130/jtuh.27.2.2020.23
Cross-Societal Variation in Norm Enforcement Systems: A ReviewPreprint
Molho, C., Petrillo, F. D., Garfield, Z. H., & Sam (2023) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/65smk
A machine learning approach for abstraction and reasoning problems without large amounts of data
Isik, S. E., Aytekin, A. E., & Vurus, H. (2022) · Journal of Emerging Investigators · doi:10.59720/21-137
How Smoking Became a Moral Issue: A Complex Systems Perspective on MoralizationPreprint
Vanaman, M. (2024) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/y6b4x
Atheoretical and Transtheoretical Techniques
Shapiro, J. P. (2015) · doi:10.1002/9781394260164.ch8
(2015) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781394260164.refs
Clarke, S. (2014) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118529683.ch2
Clarke, S. (2014) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118529683.refs
Innate Principles and the Digital Object: Insights from Core Knowledge Theory
Califf, C. B., & Springer, M. (2023) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.24251/hicss.2023.770
Zerilli, J. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190067885.002.0007
Zerilli, J. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190067885.002.0004
Zerilli, J. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190067885.002.0003
Zerilli, J. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190067885.002.0005
The Evolution of Fodor’s Case against Concept Learning
Laurence, S., & Margolis, E. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191925375.003.0024
Laurence, S., & Margolis, E. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191925375.003.0022
Fodor’s Biological Account of Concept Acquisition—and the Importance of Cultural Learning
Laurence, S., & Margolis, E. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191925375.003.0026
Laurence, S., & Margolis, E. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191925375.003.0023
Laurence, S., & Margolis, E. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191925375.003.0028
Laurence, S., & Margolis, E. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191925375.003.0025
The Argument from Early Development (2)
Laurence, S., & Margolis, E. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191925375.003.0009
Laurence, S., & Margolis, E. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191925375.003.0007
Laurence, S., & Margolis, E. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191925375.003.0019
Laurence, S., & Margolis, E. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191925375.003.0004
The Argument from Universality
Laurence, S., & Margolis, E. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191925375.003.0011
Laurence, S., & Margolis, E. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191925375.002.0005
The Argument from Neural Wiring
Laurence, S., & Margolis, E. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191925375.003.0013
Laurence, S., & Margolis, E. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191925375.003.0010
Laurence, S., & Margolis, E. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191925375.003.0017
The Argument from Cognitive and Behavioural Quirks
Laurence, S., & Margolis, E. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191925375.003.0015
Why the Rationalism-Empiricism Debate Isn’t the Nature-Nurture Debate
Laurence, S., & Margolis, E. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191925375.003.0003
The Argument from Early Development (1)
Laurence, S., & Margolis, E. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191925375.003.0008
Abstraction and the Allure of Illusory Explanation
Laurence, S., & Margolis, E. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191925375.003.0005
Laurence, S., & Margolis, E. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191925375.003.0018
Laurence, S., & Margolis, E. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191925375.003.0001
Laurence, S., & Margolis, E. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191925375.002.0007
Laurence, S., & Margolis, E. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191925375.003.0021
Laurence, S., & Margolis, E. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191925375.003.0027
The Argument from Initial Representational Access
Laurence, S., & Margolis, E. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191925375.003.0012
The Argument from Prepared Learning
Laurence, S., & Margolis, E. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191925375.003.014
Laurence, S., & Margolis, E. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191925375.003.0016
Laurence, S., & Margolis, E. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191925375.002.0006
What the Rationalism-Empiricism Debate Is Really About
Laurence, S., & Margolis, E. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191925375.003.0002
Laurence, S., & Margolis, E. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191925375.003.0020
Concepts, Innateness, and Why Concept Nativism Is about More Than Just Innate Concepts
Laurence, S., & Margolis, E. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191925375.003.0006
Gottschling, V. (2024) · J.B. Metzler eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-476-05416-6_17
Searight, H. R. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-38971-9_1422-1
(2017) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199697960.002.0010
Huang, Y. (2017) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199697960.002.0007
List of Symbols and Abbreviations
(2017) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199697960.002.0008
(2017) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199697960.002.0005
Why Perspective, Why Mental Files?
Perner, J. (2025) · doi:10.1093/9780191879074.003.0001
Perner, J. (2025) · doi:10.1093/9780191879074.003.0013
Metadata
- Authors
- Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J.
- Venue
- Mapping the Mind
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 1994-04-29
- Pages
- 85-116
- OpenAlex
- W1525192663
- Cited by
- 849
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 37 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 29
- FWCI
- 41.52
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Language and cultural evolution
- Keywords
- domain specificity, modularity, natural selection, ancestral environment, cognitive evolution, brain organization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
