The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Toward the analysis of lithic production systems
Abstract
This chapter serves as an introduction to the volume. Its objective is to open discussion on the importance of prehistoric quarries and lithic production in the contexts of procurement, exchange, technology, and social organization. The concept of lithic production systems is defined and discussed. These systems can be reconstructed by adapting the strategies and techniques developed for exchange systems. The analysis of the quarry, debitage analysis at sites within the study region, the use of production indices and spatial analysis, chemical characterization and chronometric dating of artifacts and debitage will play roles in reconstructing lithic production systems. The quarry is the most important site and component of these systems. A complete analysis of the quarry will allow the researcher to reconstruct the processes of extraction, selection, knapping, and on-site activity of the average knapper, as well as documenting the reduction sequences, changes in technology and rates of production over time. The quarry remains the logical site to begin the study of a stone-tool-using culture. It is important to understand the nature of different lithic production systems and the variables which affect their structure and morphology. The paper opens discussion on a number of variables for consideration. It is expected that the regional lithic resource base, the modes of procurement, social distance between knappers and consumers, labor investment, modes of transportation and so…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Not only physiographic elements must be considered; the landscape can be parceled and intergroup boundaries constructed; cultural partition of the landscape under these conditions can change lithic procurement strategies.
“No solo los elementos fisiográficos deben ser tenidos en consideración, el paisaje puede ser parcelado y los límites intergrupos construidos; la partición cultural del paisaje bajo estas condiciones puede cambiar las estrategias de aprovisionamiento lítico (Ericson, 1984;McAnany, 1988).”
From Abastecimiento de obsidiana en los andes: aplicación de un modelo de distancia anisotrópica en el ´´área de laguna del diamante (S34°) (2024) · cites this paper as Ericson, 1984
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lucero, G. F., Castro, S. C., & Cortegoso, V. (2021) · Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports · doi:10.1016/j.jasrep.2021.103026 · Cited by 13
Yebra, L. G., Cortegoso, V., Castro, S., & Lucero, G. (2024) · Relaciones · doi:10.24215/18521479e094 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Ericson, J. E.
- Venue
- Prehistoric Quarries and Lithic Production
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 1984-07-26
- Pages
- 1-10
- Cited by
- 47
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review