Cited by 47

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Toward the analysis of lithic production systems

Ericson, Jonathon E.·1984·Prehistoric Quarries and Lithic Production

Abstract

This chapter serves as an introduction to the volume. Its objective is to open discussion on the importance of prehistoric quarries and lithic production in the contexts of procurement, exchange, technology, and social organization. The concept of lithic production systems is defined and discussed. These systems can be reconstructed by adapting the strategies and techniques developed for exchange systems. The analysis of the quarry, debitage analysis at sites within the study region, the use of production indices and spatial analysis, chemical characterization and chronometric dating of artifacts and debitage will play roles in reconstructing lithic production systems. The quarry is the most important site and component of these systems. A complete analysis of the quarry will allow the researcher to reconstruct the processes of extraction, selection, knapping, and on-site activity of the average knapper, as well as documenting the reduction sequences, changes in technology and rates of production over time. The quarry remains the logical site to begin the study of a stone-tool-using culture. It is important to understand the nature of different lithic production systems and the variables which affect their structure and morphology. The paper opens discussion on a number of variables for consideration. It is expected that the regional lithic resource base, the modes of procurement, social distance between knappers and consumers, labor investment, modes of transportation and so…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/cbo9780511753244.002

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Not only physiographic elements must be considered; the landscape can be parceled and intergroup boundaries constructed; cultural partition of the landscape under these conditions can change lithic procurement strategies.

    “No solo los elementos fisiográficos deben ser tenidos en consideración, el paisaje puede ser parcelado y los límites intergrupos construidos; la partición cultural del paisaje bajo estas condiciones puede cambiar las estrategias de aprovisionamiento lítico (Ericson, 1984;McAnany, 1988).”

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ericson, J. E.
Venue
Prehistoric Quarries and Lithic Production
Published
1984-07-26
Pages
1-10
Cited by
47
References
0

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review