Cited by 7,869Spatial and Panel Data AnalysisStatistical Methods and Bayesian InferenceAdvanced Causal Inference Techniques

Analysis of Panel Data

Open access
Hsiao, Cheng·2003·Cambridge University Press eBooks

Abstract

Panel data models have become increasingly popular among applied researchers due to their heightened capacity for capturing the complexity of human behavior as compared to cross-sectional or time series data models. As a consequence, richer panel data sets also have become increasingly available. This 2003 second edition is a substantial revision of the highly successful first edition of 1986. Advances in panel data research are presented in a rigorous and accessible manner and are carefully integrated with the older material. The thorough discussion of theory and the judicious use of empirical examples make this book useful to graduate students and advanced researchers in economics, business, sociology, political science, etc. Other specific revisions include the introduction of the notion of strict exogeneity with estimators presented in a generalized method of moments framework, the notion of incidental parameters, more intuitive explanations of pairwise trimming, and discussion of sample selection dynamic panel models.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/cbo9780511754203

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The distinction between the effects of changing traits within and across persons is traditional in econometrics.

    “The distinction between the effects of changing traits within and across persons is traditional in econometrics.100”

    From Personality Psychology and Economics (2011) · cites this paper as Hsiao [2003]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hsiao, C.
Venue
Cambridge University Press eBooks
Published
2003-02-13
OpenAlex
W2097978133
Cited by
7,869
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 279 · 2025: 273 · 2024: 208 · 2023: 173 · 2022: 185 · 2021: 260 · 2020: 214 · 2019: 233 · 2018: 253 · 2017: 237 · 2016: 265 · 2015: 329 · 2014: 311 · 2013: 331 · 2012: 305
FWCI
428.50
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Spatial and Panel Data Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
Keywords
panel data analysis, causal inference, microeconomic behavior, time-series cross-section data, econometric methodology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review