The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Drug War Heresies: Learning from Other Vices, Times, and Places
Abstract
This book provides the first multidisciplinary and nonpartisan analysis of how the United States should decide on the legal status of cocaine, heroin and marijuana. It draws on data about the experiences of Western European nations with less punitive drug policies as well as new analyses of America's experience with legal cocaine and heroin a century ago, and of America's efforts to regulate gambling, prostitution, alcohol and cigarettes. It offers projections on the likely consequences of a number of different legalization regimes and shows that the choice about how to regulate drugs involves complicated tradeoffs among goals and conflict among social groups. The book presents a sophisticated discussion of how society should deal with the uncertainty about the consequences of legal change. Finally, it explains, in terms of individual attitudes toward risk, why it is so difficult to accomplish substantial reform of drug policy in America.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Development of a rational scale to assess the harm of drugs of potential misuse
Nutt, D., King, L. A., Saulsbury, W., & Blakemore, C. (2007) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(07)60464-4 · Cited by 1,302
What Can We Learn From The Portuguese Decriminalization of Illicit Drugs?
Hughes, C. E., & Stevens, A. (2010) · British Journal of Criminology · doi:10.1093/bjc/azq038 · Cited by 440
RITTER, A., & CAMERON, J. (2006) · Drug and Alcohol Review · doi:10.1080/09595230600944529 · Cited by 300
Tyler, T. R., Goff, P. A., & MacCoun, R. J. (2015) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1177/1529100615617791 · Cited by 280
Self-citationDo Prisons Make Us Safer?: The Benefits and Costs of the Prison Boom
(2010) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.47-3505 · Cited by 196
Metadata
- Authors
- MacCoun, R. J., & Reuter, P.
- Venue
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2001-08-27
- OpenAlex
- W2023796790
- Cited by
- 675
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 66.07
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Drug War Heresies: Learning from Other Vices, Times, and Places. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/cbo9780511754272
- The paper
- MacCoun, R. J., & Reuter, P. (2001). Drug War Heresies: Learning from Other Vices, Times, and Places. Cambridge University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511754272
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.