Cited by 440Criminal Law and PolicyCriminal Justice and Corrections AnalysisSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

What Can We Learn From The Portuguese Decriminalization of Illicit Drugs?

Open access
Hughes, C. E., Stevens, A.·2010·British Journal of Criminology

Abstract

The issue of decriminalizing illicit drugs is hotly debated, but is rarely subject to evidence-based analysis. This paper examines the case of Portugal, a nation that decriminalized the use and possession of all illicit drugs on 1 July 2001. Drawing upon independent evaluations and interviews conducted with 13 key stakeholders in 2007 and 2009, it critically analyses the criminal justice and health impacts against trends from neighbouring Spain and Italy. It concludes that contrary to predictions, the Portuguese decriminalization did not lead to major increases in drug use. Indeed, evidence indicates reductions in problematic use, drug-related harms and criminal justice overcrowding. The article discusses these developments in the context of drug law debates and criminological discussions on late modern governance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bjc/azq038

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

9 of 85 cited sources checked · 3 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation

    The primary impact of removing criminal penalties was reducing the burden and cost in the criminal justice system.

    “The primary impact was reducing the burden and cost in the criminal justice system.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites MacCoun and Reuter 2001a source

      In “The basis for continued cannabis prohibition” (page unavailable), the authors identify expensive, intrusive enforcement as a primary harm of criminalisation and say prohibition is costly. That supports the rationale for reducing criminal-justice costs, but the passage does not establish that reduced burden and cost was the primary observed impact of removing penalties. (LLM, conf=0.80)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    Rates of drug use are not directly affected by harsher punishment of drug users.

    “Despite international evidence that rates of drug use are not directly affected by harsher punishment of drug users (Reuter and Stevens 2007;Degenhardt et al. 2008)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Reuter and Stevens 2007

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Degenhardt et al. 2008 source

      The Discussion reports that the US had high drug-use levels despite punitive policies and concludes that punitive possession-and-use policies account for limited variation in national rates. That supports a weak relationship, but the paper does not establish that harsher punishment has no direct effect on drug-use rates. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    Removal of criminal penalties reduced the intrusiveness of criminal justice responses to users.

    “This also reduced the intrusiveness of criminal justice responses to users.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites MacCoun and Reuter 2001a source
  • Premisecitation

    The extent of additional drug use depended on the extent of commercial promotion.

    “The extent of additional use depended rather on the extent to which there was commercial promotion.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites MacCoun and Reuter 2001a source

      In the ‘National Household Survey on Drug Abuse’ section (page not available), the authors hypothesise that increased access and promotion contributed to rising Dutch cannabis use, while cautioning that commercialisation was not the sole cause. In ‘The basis for continued cannabis prohibition’ (page not available), they say they believe supplier promotion would produce larger increases in use. These passages support a link, but not the claim’s unqualified statement that the extent of additional use depended on the extent of promotion. (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    Removal of criminal penalties alone had little or no impact on the prevalence of drug use or drug-related health harms.

    “The removal of criminal penalties alone had little or no impact on the prevalence of drug use or drug-related health harms.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites MacCoun and Reuter 2001a source

      The Abstract and the section on cannabis prohibition say that removing criminal penalties for cannabis possession does not appear to increase drug-use prevalence. They do not establish that removal has little or no impact on drug-related health harms; the paper discusses harms of cannabis use and criminalisation without assessing that outcome. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 52
  • May combine two claims. 59
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 2
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Removal of criminal penalties appeared to produce positive but slight impacts.

    “They concluded that the removal of criminal penalties appeared to produce positive but slight impacts.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites MacCoun and Reuter 2001a source

      The Abstract (page unavailable) argues for decriminalising cannabis possession because it does not appear to increase drug prevalence. In “The basis for continued cannabis prohibition” (page unavailable), the authors also describe prohibition as harmful and costly. These passages support a favorable assessment of removing criminal penalties, but they do not characterize its positive impacts as slight. (LLM, conf=0.78)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Best-practice evidence suggests that the most effective treatment response for cannabis-dependent users is a brief intervention involving six sessions of cognitive behavioural therapy, which is not currently provided in Portugal.

    “Best-practice evidence suggests that the most effective treatment response for cannabis-dependent users is a 'brief intervention' involving six sessions of cognitive behavioural therapy, yet this is not currently provided in Portugal (see, e.g.Copeland et al. 2001).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Copeland et al. 2001 source

      The Discussion reports better outcomes for both one- and six-session CBT than for delayed treatment, and greater reductions in cannabis consumption and dependence with six sessions. It also reports no significant difference between the two interventions on several other outcomes, so the trial does not establish six-session CBT as the most effective treatment overall. The cited passages do not address whether it was provided in Portugal. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    A particular risk in cross-national policy analysis is ethnocentrism over definitions of key terms and policy rationales.

    “For example, Nelken (2009) has argued that one particular risk is of ethnocentrism over definitions of key terms and policy rationales.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Nelken 2009 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Key informants identified decisions not to replace retiring core CDT staff as the biggest challenge to understanding long-term effects of the reform.

    “For key informants, the biggest challenge in understanding the long-term effects of the reform has been a series of decisions to not replace core CDT staff if they retired.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    The number of finalized CDT processes decreased between 2003 and 2006, with the proportion of cases receiving an administrative sanction declining from 75 per cent in 2003 to 48 per cent in 2006.

    “The number of processes that have been decided upon or 'finalized' decreased between 2003 and 2006, which meant there was an overall decline in the proportion of cases in which drug users received an administrative sanction from the CDTs (from 75 per cent in 2003 to 48 per cent in 2006).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Most referred drug users are male (94 per cent) and between ages 16-24 (47 per cent) and 25-34 (31 per cent).

    “Most of the referred drug users are male (94 per cent) and between the ages of 16-24 (47 per cent) and 25-34 (31 per cent).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    As of mid 2008, all CDTs except Vila Real were back in operation.

    “As of mid 2008, all CDTs, with the exception of Vila Real, were back in operation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    In Spain, the burden on police grew due to large increases in administrative detections for drug use/possession since 1998 and smaller increases in criminal detections for drug trafficking since 2004.

    “This is a notable finding in light of the data from Spain (see Figure 3), where the burden on the police has grown as a result of large increases in the number of offenders detected through the administrative system for drug use/possession (since 1998) and smaller increases in detections through the criminal system for drug trafficking (since 2004) (Reitox National Focal Point 2008).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Reitox National Focal Point 2008

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingreasoning

    Stakeholders reported that the CDTs provided a broader range of responses.

    “the provision of a broader range of responses;”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    Stakeholders said the full potential of the reform had not been reached due to lack of full staff in all CDTs and lack of appropriate interventions for young and occasional drug users.

    “But, due to the problems cited above, namely the lack of full staff in all CDTs and the lack of appropriate interventions to which to refer young and occasional drug users, stakeholders said the full potential of the reform had not been reached.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Since 2002, the CDTs have initiated about 6,000 administrative processes against drug users per year, trending upwards to 6,543 processes in 2008.

    “Since 2002, the CDTs have initiated about 6,000 administrative processes against drug users per year, with the number trending upwards to 6,543 processes in 2008 (Instituto da Droga e da Toxicodepende ˆncia 2009).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Instituto da Droga e da Toxicodepende ˆncia 2009

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    The youth trends in Portugal were similar to those in Italy and Europe, except the 2003-07 decline in any illicit substance use was more pronounced in Portugal and the decline in cannabis use was less pronounced.

    “This was very similar to the trends observed in Italy and in broader Europe, with the major differences being that the 2003-07 decline in reported use of any illicit substance appears more pronounced in Portugal and the decline in reported cannabis use appears less pronounced in Portugal.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    Only 5-6 per cent of offenders have been referred to a CDT twice in any one year.

    “For example, while it is known that only 5-6 per cent of offenders have been referred to a CDT twice in any one year,”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Portugal, Spain, and Italy all reported increases in lifetime prevalence of hashish, amphetamines, and cocaine, and in past-year prevalence of cannabis and cocaine.

    “All three nations reported increases in lifetime prevalence of hashish, amphetamines and cocaine as well as increases in the last year prevalence of cannabis and cocaine use.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingreasoning

    Stakeholders reported that the CDTs increased provision of treatment and harm-reduction services for experienced and dependent users.

    “and increased provision of treatment and harm-reduction services for experienced and dependent users.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    The quantity of illicit drugs seized in Portugal increased overall, especially drugs destined for external markets.

    “But there has been an overall increase in the quantity of illicit drugs seized, particularly those destined for external markets.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Other drug-linked thefts, such as assaults/robberies from post offices and thefts from homes and businesses, declined by 60%, 8%, and 10%, respectively.

    “Conversely, other forms of theft such as assaults/robberies from post offices and thefts from homes and businesses (which were deemed strongly linked to drugs) declined by 60, 8 and 10 per cent, respectively.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Direcc xa ˜o Central de Investigac xa ˜o do Tra ´fico de Estupefacientes 2004

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Rates of intravenous drug use before and inside prison fell, as did HIV prevalence among prisoners.

    “Rates of intravenous use before and inside prison had also fallen, as had the prevalence of HIV amongst prisoners.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Torres 2009

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    The central police report concluded that opportunistic crimes increased while more complex, premeditated, and potentially violent crimes decreased.

    “The report by the central police agencies concluded that there had been an increase in more opportunistic crimes but a reduction in crimes that were more complex, pre-mediated and likely to involve threats or use of violence (Direcc xa ˜o Central de Investigac xa ˜o do Tra ´fico de Estupefacientes 2004).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Direcc xa ˜o Central de Investigac xa ˜o do Tra ´fico de Estupefacientes 2004

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    In Spain, although problem opiate users declined, estimates from 2006 suggest overall problematic drug users may have increased due to more problematic cocaine users.

    “Even in Spain, where the number of problem opiate users is estimated to have declined, estimates from 2006 suggest the overall number of problematic drug users may also have increased, due to an increase in the number of problematic cocaine users (Reitox National Focal Point 2008).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Reitox National Focal Point 2008

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingreasoning

    Stakeholders reported that the CDTs increased emphasis on prevention for occasional users.

    “increased emphasis on prevention for occasional users;”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    Key stakeholders in Portugal were in general agreement that there have been small to moderate increases in overall reported drug use among adults.

    “Key stakeholders in Portugal were in general agreement that there has been small to moderate increases in overall reported drug use among adults.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Between 1995-99 and 2000-04, the amount of drugs seized increased by 499% overall: cocaine 116%, hashish 134%, heroin 219%, and ecstasy 1,526%.

    “As one of the evaluation reports noted between 1995-99 and 2000-04, the amount of drugs seized increased by 499 per cent: 116 per cent for cocaine, 134 per cent for hashish, 219 per cent for heroin and 1,526 per cent for ecstasy (Direcc xa ˜o Central de Investigac xa ˜o do Tra ´fico de Estupefacientes 2004).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Direcc xa ˜o Central de Investigac xa ˜o do Tra ´fico de Estupefacientes 2004

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    Stakeholders reported that the CDTs provided earlier intervention for drug users by a specialist panel of experts.

    “According to the stakeholders that we interviewed, the CDTs provided a number of advantages, including: earlier intervention for drug users by a specialist panel of experts;”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    In Spain, cocaine replaced heroin as the major cause of hospital admission and is the second most likely drug associated with death.

    “For example, in Spain, cocaine has taken over from heroin as the major cause of hospital admission and is the second most likely drug to be associated with death.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingcitation

    In the run-up to the 2009 general election, the incumbent Prime Minister gave a speech in Lisbon at the EMCDDA.

    “In the run-up to the 2009 general election, the incumbent Prime Minister gave a speech in Lisbon at the European Monitoring Centre on Drugs and Drug Addiction (So ´crates 2009).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites So ´crates 2009

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Italy showed relatively flat seizure trends with no discernible spikes in hashish or ecstasy quantities since 1999/2000.

    “It is also different from Italy (see Figure 6), where there had been relatively flat trends with no discernable spikes in hashish or ecstasy seizure quantities since 1999/2000.12”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites EMCDDA 2009b

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Among drug users in Portugal, HIV cases fell from 907 to 267 and AIDS cases from 506 to 108 between 2000 and 2008.

    “For example, between 2000 and 2008, the number of cases of HIV reduced amongst drug users from 907 to 267 and the number of cases of AIDS reduced from 506 to 108 (Instituto da Droga e da Toxicodepende ˆncia 2009).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Instituto da Droga e da Toxicodepende ˆncia 2009

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Opiate-related deaths and infectious diseases in Portugal decreased after decriminalization.

    “reduction in opiate-related deaths and infectious diseases”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    There have been significant reductions in mortality, HIV, HCV, and TB in Portugal.

    “There have been significant reductions in mortality, HIV, HCV and TB.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    All three nations showed a plateau in drug-related deaths in the mid-2000s, but only Portugal had a recent increase.

    “All three nations showed a plateau in the mid 2000s but Portugal is unique in the recent increase.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingcitation

    Spanish experts suggested the lack of change was due to greater-than-estimated cocaine supply in Spain.

    “Spanish experts therefore have suggested the lack of change is due to greater-thanestimated levels of cocaine supply in Spain (Reitox National Focal Point 2008).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Reitox National Focal Point 2008

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Seizures spiked for different substances: ecstasy in 2001-2003, hashish in 2003-2006, cocaine in 2004-2006, and larger hashish quantities in 2007-2008.

    “Instead, there have been spikes in seizures of a number of different substances with large seizures of ecstasy between 2001 and 2003, hashish between 2003 and 2006, cocaine between 2004 and 2006 and even larger quantities of hashish between 2007 and 2008 (see Figure 4).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    The average price of 1 gram of heroin fell from $50.27 in 2001 to $33.25 in 2008, and an ecstasy tablet fell from $6.86 to $2.80.

    “For example, the reported average price of 1 gram of heroin decreased from $50.27 in 2001 to $33.25 in 2008 and the average price of an ecstasy tablet fell from $6.86 in 2001 to $2.80 in 2008 (see Table 5).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingcitation

    The Prime Minister pledged continuing support for the reform.

    “He pledged his continuing support for it.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites So ´crates 2009

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Other jurisdictions such as Western Australia have not been so fortunate and are overturning a hard-fought-for reform.

    “Other jurisdictions such as Western Australia have not been so fortunate, and are in the process of overturning a hard-fought-for reform (Barrett 2009).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Barrett 2009

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Since Portugal introduced its drug strategy and decriminalization, all three nations showed declines in drug-related deaths, with declines more pronounced in Portugal and Italy than in Spain.

    “That aside, it is clear that since the Portuguese introduction of its drug strategy and the decriminalization, all three nations showed declines in drug-related deaths, but that the declines were more pronounced in Portugal and Italy than in Spain.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Drug-related deaths due to cocaine and other substances rose in Spain but not in Portugal.

    “Other forms of drug-related deaths, especially due to cocaine, have risen in Spain but not Portugal.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    The exception in Spain is hash, whose retail prices increased since 2001, argued to be in line with increasing demand.

    “The exception is hash, as retail prices have increased since 2001, which is argued to be in line with increasing demand.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    The trend in Portugal is similar to that observed in Eastern Europe, such as Croatia and Slovenia.

    “The trend in Portugal is similar to that observed in Eastern Europe, such as Croatia and Slovenia.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    The reduction in problematic drug users and the reduction in burden of drug offenders on the criminal justice system in Portugal contrasted directly with trends in neighbouring Spain and Italy.

    “the reduction in problematic drug users and reduction in burden of drug offenders on the criminal justice system were in direct contrast to those trends observed in neighbouring Spain and Italy”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The trends in Spain and Italy provide a valid comparison to isolate effects specific to Portugal.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    Internationally, Portugal has gone furthest in emphasizing treatment as an alternative to prosecution.

    “Internationally, Portugal has gone furthest in emphasizing treatment as an alternative to prosecution.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    In Portugal, imprisonment for drug use or possession alone was rare, but criminal convictions were the norm.

    “In practice, it was rare that people were imprisoned for drug use/possession alone, but criminal convictions were the norm.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    Neighbouring Spain apparently experienced market expansions.

    “This is in contrast with apparent market expansions in neighbouring Spain.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    There was a 280 per cent increase in expiable cannabis offences in South Australia, increasing the burden on the criminal justice system.

    “In fact, there was a 280 per cent increase in expiable cannabis offences, which meant there was an overall increase in the burden on the criminal justice system (Christie and Ali 2000).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Christie and Ali 2000

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    In 2001, only 7.8 per cent of 15-64-year-olds in Portugal had ever used an illicit drug.

    “In 2001, only 7.8 per cent of 15-64-year-olds in Portugal had ever used an illicit drug (Balsa et al. 2004).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Balsa et al. 2004

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The new law applies to use/possession of all illicit drugs, including cannabis, heroin and cocaine, but is restricted to up to ten days' worth of a drug.

    “The new law applies to use/possession of all illicit drugs-including cannabis, heroin and cocaine-but it is restricted to use/possession of up to ten days' worth of a drug.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Decreto-Lei n.° 15/93

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Portaria n.° 94/96

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The decriminalization entered into force on 1 July 2001.

    “Subsequently, on 1 July 2001, the decriminalization entered into force.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lei n.° 30/2000

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    By 1999, Portugal had the highest rate of drug-related AIDS in the European Union and the second highest prevalence of HIV amongst injecting drug users.

    “By 1999, Portugal had the highest rate of drug-related AIDS in the European Union and the second highest prevalence of HIV amongst injecting drug users (EMCDDA 2000).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites EMCDDA 2000

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A government-appointed expert commission proposed to decriminalize illicit drugs for personal use and to introduce Portugal's first national drug strategy with the goal of a more comprehensive and evidence-informed approach.

    “It was within this contextfoot_1 that a government-appointed expert commission proposed to decriminalize illicit drugs for personal use and to introduce Portugal's first national drug strategy, which had the explicit goal of providing a more comprehensive and evidence-informed approach to drug use (Comissa ˜o para a Estrate ´gia Nacional de Combate a `Droga 1998).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Comissa ˜o para a Estrate ´gia Nacional de Combate a `Droga 1998

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The South Australian cannabis expiation notice scheme led to increased employment prospects and increased trust of police.

    “Evaluators found that 'decriminalization' led to increased employment prospects and increased trust of police (Lenton et al. 1999).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lenton et al. 1999

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Both sets of recommendations were adopted almost in full, and Portugal commenced the national strategy and expanded resources in May 1999.

    “Both sets of recommendations were adopted almost in full (for full details, see Hughes 2006) and Portugal commenced their ambitious reform by rolling out the national strategy and expanded resources in May 1999.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hughes 2006
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The new offences are sanctioned through Commissions for the Dissuasion of Drug Addiction (CDTs).

    “The new offences are sanctioned through specially devised Commissions for the Dissuasion of Drug Addiction (CDTs).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lei n.° 30/2000

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    In 2001/02, 34 per cent of 16-59-year-olds in the United Kingdom had used an illicit drug.

    “In contrast, the British Crime Survey reported that in 2001/02, 34 per cent of 16-59-yearolds in the United Kingdom had used an illicit drug (Aust et al. 2002).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Aust et al. 2002

      Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The Portuguese reform is a comprehensive form of decriminalization, with possession of all drugs for personal use considered an administrative rather than criminal offence.

    “The Portuguese reform warrants particular attention, as it is a comprehensive form of decriminalization, with the possession of all drugs, when deemed for personal use, 1 now considered to be an administrative rather than a criminal offence.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lei n.° 30/2000

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Some studies have found a slight increase in drug use following decriminalization.

    “Others have found a slight increase (e.g.Williams 2004; Zhao and Harris 2004;Damrongplasit et al. 2010).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Williams 2004 source
    • cites Zhao and Harris 2004 source
    • cites Damrongplasit et al. 2010

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    There was growing concern over social exclusion and marginalization of drug users, and a perception among law enforcement and health sectors that criminalization of drug use was part of the problem.

    “There was also growing concern over the social exclusion and marginalization of drug users, and a perception from many areas of society including the law enforcement and health sectors that the criminalization of drug use was increasingly part of the problem, not the solution (Hughes 2006).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hughes 2006
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Drug-related deaths in Portugal increased to a peak of 369 in 1999, an increase of 57 per cent since 1997.

    “Drug-related deaths had increased in Portugal to a peak of 369 in 1999 (an increase of 57 per cent since 1997) (Instituto Portugue ˆs da Droga e da Toxicodepende ˆncia 2000).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Instituto Portugue ˆs da Droga e da Toxicodepende ˆncia 2000

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Italy and Spain introduced administrative sanctions for drug use in 1990 and 1992, respectively, and neither implemented radical overhauls during the study period.

    “Moreover, while Italy and Spain have adopted similar drug policies, namely by introducing administrative sanctions for drug use in 1990 and 1992, respectively (for an overview, see EMCDDA 2005), neither country implemented any radical overhauls during the period of study (Reitox National Focal Point 2008;EMCDDA 2009a).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites EMCDDA 2005

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Reitox National Focal Point 2008

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites EMCDDA 2009a

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Decriminalization was deemed to have played a vital role in the advantages of the CDTs, though these advantages were often dependent on increased collaboration and expansion of treatment places.

    “While these advantages were often dependent upon the conjoint increase in collaboration and expansion of treatment places, decriminalization was deemed to have played a vital role.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The impacts of decriminalization, particularly the actions of the CDTs, were contingent upon the operation of other organizations, including police and drug treatment services.

    “Further limitations were that the impacts of decriminalization-particularly the actions of the CDTs-were also contingent upon the operation of a number of other organizations, including the police and drug treatment services.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The authors used annual EMCDDA data to compare Portuguese trends with trends from Spain and/or Italy, subject to data availability.

    “We have therefore used annual data reported to the EMCDDA to analyse Portuguese trends in light of trends from neighbouring Spain and/or Italy, subject to data availability.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Interview data were not intended to reflect the full range of public, professional and political opinion but to supplement and interrogate national documentation.

    “Our intention is not to present the interview data as reflecting the full range of public, professional and political opinion, but to use it to supplement and interrogate the data collected from the national documentation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Comparing Portuguese trends with those of nations that did not undertake the reform counters the absence of a control comparison.

    “One way of countering this is by comparing trends from the chosen nation (Portugal) with that of nations that did not undertake the reform.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    While general population trends in Portugal show slight increases in lifetime and recent illicit drug use, studies of youth and problematic drug users show declines.

    “Thus, while general population trends in Portugal suggest slight increases in lifetime and recent illicit drug use, studies of young and problematic drug users suggest that use has declined.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Individuals found with more than the consumer amount will be charged and referred to the courts, where they may face charges for trafficking or trafficking/consumption.

    “Individuals found with more than this quantity will be charged and referred to the courts, where they may face charges for trafficking or trafficking/consumption (where the offender is found in possession of more than the consumer amount, but deemed to have obtained plants, substances or preparations for personal use only) (Decreto-Lei n.° 15/93, de 22 de janeiro 1993).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Decreto-Lei n.° 15/93

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    No member of the criminal justice system was willing or able to participate in the interviews, though a former police officer and a CDT overseer could comment on criminal justice issues.

    “While no member of the criminal justice system was willing/able to take part, one stakeholder was a former police officer and another an overseer of CDT implementation; both were able to comment on criminal justice-related issues.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The constant number of administrative detections indicates no overall increase in formal contact between drug offenders and Portuguese police and no net-widening.

    “Equally importantly, the number of people detected under the new law for administrative drug use/possession offences has remained fairly constant at about 6,000 per year, thereby indicating no overall increase in the amount of formal contact that drug offenders are having with Portuguese police and so no net-widening.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Although trends from Spain and Italy are unknown, the evidence suggests that even if drug-related crime increased slightly immediately after the reform, the overall burden of drug-related offenders on the criminal justice system decreased.

    “Trends from Spain and Italy are not known, but this further suggests that even if there were small increases in drug-related crime immediately following the reform, there have been overall reductions in the burden of drug-related offenders on the criminal justice system.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The authors' proficiency in Portuguese, collaboration with IDT, and use of IDT support and feedback should reduce the risk of external bias.

    “During this process, the primary author had become proficient in reading and speaking Portuguese and collaborated with the IDT.Research for the existing research also utilized the support and feedback from those based in the IDT.These measures should reduce the risk of external bias.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    The decline in Portuguese problematic drug use is notable because Italy's number of problematic drug users is thought to have increased.

    “This trend is notable given that the number of problematic drug users in Italy is thought to have gone in the opposite direction.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The authors were unable to interview police or criminal justice representatives.

    “The sample size was not large enough to reach data saturation and neither were we able to interview police or criminal justice representatives.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The absence of a control comparison is the most important limitation for evaluating national drug policy; there is no counterfactual Portugal that did not decriminalize in 2001.

    “The most important for any evaluation of national drug policy is the absence of a control comparison; there is no counterfactual Portugal, which did not decriminalize drugs in 2001.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The authors' research suggests that current theories and assumptions about decriminalization need development.

    “Our research suggests that current theories and assumptions about decriminalization are themselves in need of development.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Decriminalization is often discussed as if it is one simple, unitary concept.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisereasoning

    The South Australian cannabis expiation notice scheme is one case in point.

    “One case in point is the South Australian cannabis expiation notice scheme.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    When emerging from dictatorship, Portugal, Italy, and Spain adapted their constitutions to recognize citizenship rights and limit state interference in private life.

    “When emerging from dictatorship, all three nations adapted their constitutions to recognize rights to citizenship and limit interference by the state in the private lives of citizens.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Portuguese decriminalization stands in stark contrast to the punitive turn, having been adopted and continued for human rights, social solidarity, and recognition of punitive policy failure.

    “Indeed, the Portuguese decriminalization stands in stark contrast to it, given its adoption and continuation for reasons of human rights, social solidarity and acknowledgement of the failure of punitive policies.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The lack of increase in Spanish cocaine prices and stable purity is argued to be odd because other indicators suggest cocaine demand increased.

    “Indeed, the lack of increase in the price of cocaine in Spain (and stable purity) is argued to be odd, since other Spanish indicators suggest cocaine demand has been increasing.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The authors dispute Greenwald's tendency to attribute positive changes in Portugal to decriminalization alone.

    “For example, we would dispute Greenwald's (2009) tendency to attribute positive changes in Portugal to decriminalization alone.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Greenwald's (2009) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Portugal appears largely immune to cocaine-related deaths, with very low cocaine use, and decriminalization does not appear to have disturbed this pattern.

    “Portugal would appear to have been largely immune to this, with very low levels of cocaine use, and the decriminalization would not appear to have disturbed this pattern.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    The major perceived success of the Portuguese reform has been its contribution to public health improvements, with significant early referrals of heroin users to treatment by CDTs.

    “The major perceived success of the Portuguese reform has been its contribution to changes in public health problems, with significant referrals-particularly in the early years-by the CDTs of heroin users to treatment.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The Portuguese reform provides important evidence for the debate on decriminalization impacts.

    “Yet, the reform provides important evidence for the debate on the impacts of decriminalization.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Portugal, Italy, and Spain all had totalitarian regimes in the last century.

    “All had totalitarian regimes in the last century.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Because heroin problems drove the reform, key informants deemed the reduction in overdose and opiate-related deaths a considerable achievement of decriminalization and the broader drug strategy.

    “Given that heroin problems were the major driver of the reform, this reduction in overdose and opiate-related death was deemed by key informants as a considerable achievement of both the decriminalization and the broader drug strategy.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Other difficulties were less controllable.

    “Others were less controllable.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Such effects can be observed when decriminalizing all illicit drugs.

    “Moreover, such affects can be observed when decriminalizing all illicit drugs.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The reductions in drug prices may indicate either increased supply or reduced demand.

    “The reductions in price may point to two phenomena: increased supply and reduced demand.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    None of the other decriminalization models is as explicitly linked to dissuasion, treatment, and integration as the Portuguese approach.

    “None of the other models is as explicitly linked to dissuasion, treatment and integration as the Portuguese approach.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Some difficulties were an inevitable side effect of adopting a new reform.

    “Some difficulties were an inevitable side effect of adopting a new reform.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In the first decade of this century, it has often been claimed that there is a general shift toward punitive penal policies and use of crime policies to legitimate neoliberal governance.

    “In the first decade of this century, it has often been claimed that we are witnessing a general shift towards punitive penal policies and the use of crime policies to legitimate neoliberal governance (Garland 2001;Simon 2007).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Garland 2001;Simon 2007

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The drug price data suggest that reduced use was due to reduced demand rather than successful drug seizures, though more detailed studies are needed to confirm this.

    “The drug price data suggest that this was due to reduced demand rather than the success in seizing drugs (which is supposed to limit drug use by reducing availability and increasing price), but more detailed studies would be needed to confirm this.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The authors' multi-year studies illustrate challenges in assessing decriminalization impacts and the importance of timing assessment relative to implementation.

    “Our studies of the Portuguese decriminalization over a number of years have further illustrated the challenges in assessing the impacts from such a reform and the need to recognize the importance of the timing of assessment in relation to implementation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    It remains unclear whether the observed impacts were influenced more by the policy or by its implementation.

    “It also remains unclear whether the observed impacts were influenced more by the policy or its implementation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In 2007, an estimated 3.7 per cent of the Portuguese population aged 15-64 used any illicit drug in the last year, approximately 261,968 people.

    “The 2007 data estimated 3.7 per cent population aged 15-64 used any illicit drug in the last year(Balsa et al. 2007) = approximately 261,968 people.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Balsa et al. 2007

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Data on last-year drug use was not collected in the European School Survey Project on Alcohol and other Drugs (ESPAD).

    “Unfortunately, data on last-year use, a more relevant indicator of current drug usage patterns, was not collected in the European School survey Project on Alcohol and other Drugs (ESPAD).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    This estimate is similar to other estimates of criminal justice system intervention, which vary between 1 and 3 per cent.

    “This estimate is similar to other estimates of CJS intervention, which vary between 1 and 3 per cent (see, e.g.Lenton 2000).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lenton 2000

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Combining removal of criminal penalties with alternative therapeutic responses can reduce the burden of drug law enforcement on the criminal justice system while also reducing problematic drug use.

    “It can reduce the burden of drug law enforcement on the criminal justice system, while also reducing problematic drug use.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Decriminalization may offer a model for other nations wishing to provide less punitive, more integrated and effective responses to drug use.

    “But it may offer a model for other nations that wish to provide less punitive, more integrated and effective responses to drug use.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The Portuguese experience is sufficiently relevant and transferable to serve as a model for other nations.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The small increases in adult drug use are less important than the major reductions in opiate-related deaths and infections and reductions in young people's drug use.

    “We would argue that they are less important than the major reductions seen in opiate-related deaths and infections, as well as reductions in young people's drug use.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The increase in adult drug use in Portugal reflects regional shifts and/or expansion of services throughout Portugal.

    “while some trends clearly reflect regional shifts (e.g. the increase in use amongst adults) and/or the expansion of services throughout Portugal”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
100 of 100
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Most public arguments about drug decriminalization are based on speculation rather than available evidence.

    “However, most public arguments are based on speculation rather than the available evidence on effects.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    No reports on the Portuguese decriminalization have appeared in English peer-reviewed journals.

    “but so far, no reports on it have appeared in English peer-reviewed journals.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The Portuguese reform has been in force long enough to measure its effects.

    “The Portuguese reform has now been in force for almost nine years-time enough to measure the effects.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Drug use, market changes, and drug-related crime are notoriously hard to measure by any means.

    “Drug use, market changes and drug-related crime is notoriously hard to measure by any means.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    There are few data on which to assess the long-term impacts of the CDT process.

    “There are few data on which to assess the long-term impacts of the CDT process.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Figures have not yet been collected on prior or subsequent offending and drug use amongst those referred through the CDTs.

    “figures have not yet been collected on prior or subsequent offending and drug use amongst those referred through the CDTs.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The primary aim of the CDTs is to dissuade drug use and encourage dependent drug users into treatment.

    “However, their primary aim is to dissuade drug use and to encourage dependent drug users into treatment.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The qualitative research sample size was not large enough to reach data saturation.

    “The sample size was not large enough to reach data saturation”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    At the start of the decriminalization process and national drug strategy, problematic drug use was the major concern.

    “Problematic drug use was the major concern at the commencement of the decriminalization process and national drug strategy.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Drug-related death counts are affected by changes in recording practices as well as underlying drug use rates.

    “Drug-related deaths are subject to changes in recording as well as changes in underlying rates of drug use.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Decriminalization is often discussed as if it is one simple, unitary concept.

    “Decriminalization is often discussed as if it is one, simple, unitary concept.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Decriminalization is commonly restricted to cannabis alone.

    “This is important, as decriminalization is commonly restricted to cannabis alone.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Many reforms are evaluated only early in their adoption, which may lead to underestimation of their true impacts.

    “Many reforms are evaluated only early on in their adoption, which may lead to underestimation of their true impacts.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The trends in Spain and Italy provide a valid comparison to isolate effects specific to Portugal.

    “By comparing the trends in Portugal and neighbouring Spain and Italy, we can say that while some trends clearly reflect regional shifts”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The Portuguese experience is sufficiently relevant and transferable to serve as a model for other nations.

    “But it may offer a model for other nations that wish to provide less punitive, more integrated and effective responses to drug use.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The statistical indicators and key informant interviews reviewed are adequate to identify changes since decriminalization.

    “the statistical indicators and key informant interviews that we have reviewed suggest that since decriminalization in July 2001, the following changes have occurred”
16 of 16

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Conflicting 2001 lifetime drug-use prevalence

    Minor

    The text gives two different estimates for lifetime illicit drug use among Portuguese people aged 15-64 in 2001: 7.8% in the narrative and 7.6% in Table 1.

  • Portuguese drug prices labeled as both dollars and euros

    Minor

    The narrative uses dollar signs for the 2001 and 2008 heroin prices, while Table 5 labels the same figures as euros.

  • Conflicting 2001 lifetime drug-use prevalence

    Minor

    The text gives 7.8 per cent for lifetime illicit drug use among 15-64-year-olds in 2001, while Table 1 gives 7.6 per cent for the same population, measure and year.

  • Drug prices have conflicting currency labels

    Minor

    The text labels the 2001 and 2008 heroin and ecstasy prices as dollars, but Table 5 labels those same numerical prices as euros.

4 of 4

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. 1993, 88, 737
  2. 2009, REVISTA TOXICODEPENDENCIAS, 15, 19

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hughes, C. E., & Stevens, A.
Affiliations
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
  • University of Kent (GB)
Corresponding author
Hughes, C. E.
Venue
British Journal of Criminology
Published
2010-07-21
Volume
50
Issue
6
Pages
999-1022
ISSN
  • 0007-0955 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-3529
OpenAlex
W2148618983
Cited by
440
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 56 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 51 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 18
FWCI
44.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The British Journal of Criminology (publishedVersion)
  • Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Beckley Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Law and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
drug decriminalization, Portugal, drug policy, drug use trends, drug-related harm, drug law, harm reduction, Spain, Italy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-09-28.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-09-28.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review