What Can We Learn From The Portuguese Decriminalization of Illicit Drugs?
Open accessAbstract
The issue of decriminalizing illicit drugs is hotly debated, but is rarely subject to evidence-based analysis. This paper examines the case of Portugal, a nation that decriminalized the use and possession of all illicit drugs on 1 July 2001. Drawing upon independent evaluations and interviews conducted with 13 key stakeholders in 2007 and 2009, it critically analyses the criminal justice and health impacts against trends from neighbouring Spain and Italy. It concludes that contrary to predictions, the Portuguese decriminalization did not lead to major increases in drug use. Indeed, evidence indicates reductions in problematic use, drug-related harms and criminal justice overcrowding. The article discusses these developments in the context of drug law debates and criminological discussions on late modern governance.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
9 of 85 cited sources checked · 3 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
The primary impact of removing criminal penalties was reducing the burden and cost in the criminal justice system.
“The primary impact was reducing the burden and cost in the criminal justice system.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites MacCoun and Reuter 2001a source
In “The basis for continued cannabis prohibition” (page unavailable), the authors identify expensive, intrusive enforcement as a primary harm of criminalisation and say prohibition is costly. That supports the rationale for reducing criminal-justice costs, but the passage does not establish that reduced burden and cost was the primary observed impact of removing penalties. (LLM, conf=0.80)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Rates of drug use are not directly affected by harsher punishment of drug users.
“Despite international evidence that rates of drug use are not directly affected by harsher punishment of drug users (Reuter and Stevens 2007;Degenhardt et al. 2008)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Reuter and Stevens 2007
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Degenhardt et al. 2008 source
The Discussion reports that the US had high drug-use levels despite punitive policies and concludes that punitive possession-and-use policies account for limited variation in national rates. That supports a weak relationship, but the paper does not establish that harsher punishment has no direct effect on drug-use rates. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Removal of criminal penalties reduced the intrusiveness of criminal justice responses to users.
“This also reduced the intrusiveness of criminal justice responses to users.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites MacCoun and Reuter 2001a source
- Premisecitation
The extent of additional drug use depended on the extent of commercial promotion.
“The extent of additional use depended rather on the extent to which there was commercial promotion.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites MacCoun and Reuter 2001a source
In the ‘National Household Survey on Drug Abuse’ section (page not available), the authors hypothesise that increased access and promotion contributed to rising Dutch cannabis use, while cautioning that commercialisation was not the sole cause. In ‘The basis for continued cannabis prohibition’ (page not available), they say they believe supplier promotion would produce larger increases in use. These passages support a link, but not the claim’s unqualified statement that the extent of additional use depended on the extent of promotion. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Removal of criminal penalties alone had little or no impact on the prevalence of drug use or drug-related health harms.
“The removal of criminal penalties alone had little or no impact on the prevalence of drug use or drug-related health harms.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites MacCoun and Reuter 2001a source
The Abstract and the section on cannabis prohibition say that removing criminal penalties for cannabis possession does not appear to increase drug-use prevalence. They do not establish that removal has little or no impact on drug-related health harms; the paper discusses harms of cannabis use and criminalisation without assessing that outcome. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
In the Netherlands, the rise in cannabis use did not immediately follow depenalization but coincided with the development of coffee shops that openly promoted illicit wares.
“They used the example of the Netherlands, where the rise in cannabis use did not immediately follow its depenalization, but coincided with the development of 'coffee shops' that openly promoted their illicit wares (MacCoun and Reuter 2001b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites MacCoun and Reuter 2001b source
- Findingcitation
The number of deaths recorded as drug-related in Portugal fell significantly between 1999 and 2002.
“the number of deaths in Portugal recorded as drug-related reduced significantly between 1999 and 2002 (Instituto da Droga e da Toxicodepende ˆncia 2009).”
- Also stated in: § Drug-related health harms · plain
“Figure 7 shows that the number of deaths in Portugal recorded as drug-related reduced significantly between 1999 and 2002 (Instituto da Droga e da Toxicodepende ˆncia 2009).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Instituto da Droga e da Toxicodepende ˆncia 2009
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Rests on an assumption: Drug-related death counts are affected by changes in recording practices as well as underlying drug use rates.
- Also stated in: § Drug-related health harms · plain
- Findingown data
The Portuguese decriminalization did not lead to major increases in drug use.
“It concludes that contrary to predictions, the Portuguese decriminalization did not lead to major increases in drug use.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Evidence indicates reductions in drug-related harms.
“Indeed, evidence indicates reductions in problematic use, drug-related harms and criminal justice overcrowding.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Evidence indicates reductions in criminal justice overcrowding.
“Indeed, evidence indicates reductions in problematic use, drug-related harms and criminal justice overcrowding.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Evidence indicates reductions in problematic drug use.
“Indeed, evidence indicates reductions in problematic use, drug-related harms and criminal justice overcrowding.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Heroin seizures declined from a peak in 1999 to a steady state in 2004.
“The main exception was seizures of heroin, which declined from a peak in 1999 to a steady state in 2004.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The major sanction used by the CDTs has been provisional suspension of proceedings for individuals deemed non-dependent on illicit drugs.
“The major sanction used by the CDTs has been the provisional suspension of proceedings for individuals who are deemed non-dependent on illicit drugs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
Between 2001 and 2007, estimated problematic drug users in Italy increased from 6.0 to 8.6 per 1,000 population aged 15-64.
“Indeed, between 2001 and 2007, the estimated number of problematic drug users in Italy increased from 6.0 to 8.6 per 1,000 population aged 15-64 (calculated using multivariate indicator method) (EMCDDA 2009b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites EMCDDA 2009b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingown data
After decriminalization, the number of alleged drug offenders arrested and sent to criminal courts substantially decreased.
“Following the decriminalization, there was a substantial reduction in the number of alleged drug offenders being arrested and sent to the criminal courts.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
The use of provisional sanctions with treatment for dependent individuals decreased from 31 per cent in 2002 to 18 per cent in 2008.
“Perhaps due to the decline in offenders being seen for heroin, the use of provisional sanctions with treatment (for dependent individuals) has decreased since the first full year of operation (31 per cent in 2002) and made up only 18 per cent of sanctions in 2008.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
The proportion of drug-related offenders in Portuguese prisons fell from 44% in 1999 to 21% in 2008.
“The proportion of drug-related offenders in the Portuguese prison population, that is offences committed under the influence of drugs and/or to fund drug consumption, has dropped from 44 per cent in 1999 to 21 per cent in 2008 (Instituto da Droga e da Toxicodepende ˆncia 2009).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Instituto da Droga e da Toxicodepende ˆncia 2009
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingcitation
The increase in punitive sanctions has been attributed in part to the lack of appropriate treatment options in Portugal for non-heroin dependent drug users.
“This has been attributed in part to the lack of appropriate treatment options in Portugal to which to refer non-heroin dependent drug users.6”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
Among Portuguese youth aged 15-16, reported lifetime use of most illicit drugs increased before and just after decriminalization, then declined.
“Amongst Portuguese youth (see Figure 1),foot_8 reported lifetime use of most illicit drugs increased in the lead-up to and immediately following the decriminalization, but then declined (Hibell et al. 2009).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hibell et al. 2009
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingcitation
The number of people detected under the new law for administrative drug use/possession offences remained fairly constant at about 6,000 per year.
“Equally importantly, the number of people detected under the new law for administrative drug use/possession offences has remained fairly constant at about 6,000 per year, thereby indicating no overall increase in the amount of formal contact that drug offenders are having with Portuguese police and so no net-widening.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Since 2001, most CDT cases have involved only use-acquisition or possession of cannabis or heroin.
“Since 2001, most cases have involved only use-acquisition or possession of cannabis or heroin.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
The use of punitive sanctions such as warnings, bans on attending designated places, or requirements to visit the CDTs increased from 3 per cent in 2002 to 15 per cent in 2008.
“Conversely, the use of punitive sanctions such as warnings, bans on attending designated places or requirements to visit the CDTs has increased (from 3 per cent in 2002 to 15 per cent in 2008).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
Provisional suspensions have been used in 59-68 per cent of cases per year.
“These have been used in 59-68 per cent of cases per year.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
The CDT processes represent approximately 2.5 per cent of drug users in Portugal.
“Based on estimates of current demand (see latter sections), this represents approximately 2.5 per cent drug users in Portugal.5”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
Portuguese prison density fell from 119 prisoners per 100 places in 2001 to 101.5 in 2005.
“The prison density (prisoners per 100 prison places) of Portuguese prisons fell from 119 in 2001 to 101.5 in 2005 (Council of Europe 2007).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Council of Europe 2007
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingnone given
From 1997 to 2008, the number of illicit drug seizures in Portugal changed little.
“From 1997 to 2008, there was limited change in the number of seizures of illicit drugs in Portugal.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
The proportion of CDT cases involving cannabis increased from 53 per cent in 2001 to 70 per cent in 2006, decreasing to 64 per cent in 2008.
“Conversely, the proportion involving cannabis increased from 53 per cent in 2001 to 70 per cent in 2006, decreasing to 64 per cent in 2008.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
At times between 2005 and 2008, up to 38 per cent of the CDTs, including the most frequented CDT in Lisbon, were non-operational.
“This meant that at times between 2005 and 2008, up to 38 per cent of the CDTs, including the most frequented CDT in Lisbon, were non-operational.4”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
The overlapping ranges (6.8-8.5 in 2000 and 6.2-7.4 in 2005) mean the decline in problematic drug use was not statistically significant.
“That said, the overlap in ranges (from 6.8-8.5 in 2000 to 6.2-7.4 in 2005) means that any decline has not been statistically significant.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
Since the reform, estimated prevalence of problematic drug use, especially intravenous drug use, in Portugal declined.
“Since the adoption of the reform, the prevalence of problematic drug use (PDU), particularly intravenous drug use, in Portugal is estimated to have declined.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Negreiros and Magalha ˜es (2009)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Rests on an assumption: At the start of the decriminalization process and national drug strategy, problematic drug use was the major concern.
- Findingown data
In Portugal, reported lifetime and past-year use of almost all illicit substances increased between 2001 and 2007.
“Between 2001 and 2007, lifetime and last-year use was reported to have increased in Portugal for almost all illicit substances (see Tables 1 and 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
Using a multiplier method based on treatment numbers, Negreiros and Magalhães estimated that problematic drug users in Portugal fell from 7.6 to 6.8 per 1,000 population aged 15-64 between 2000 and 2005.
“Using a multiplier method, based on the number of drug users in treatment, 9 Negreiros and Magalha ˜es (2009) calculated that between 2000 and 2005 the estimated number of problematic drug users in Portugal reduced from 7.6 to 6.8 per 1,000 population aged 15-64 years.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Negreiros and Magalha ˜es (2009)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingcitation
The decline in finalized processes was linked to the reduction in operational CDTs.
“The decline in finalized processes was linked to the reduction in operational CDTs (Instituto da Droga e da Toxicodepende ˆncia 2009).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Instituto da Droga e da Toxicodepende ˆncia 2009
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingcitation
The proportion of CDT cases involving heroin decreased from 33 per cent in 2001 to 14 per cent in 2006 and remained at 13 per cent in 2008.
“The proportion involving heroin decreased from 33 per cent in 2001 to 14 per cent in 2006 (and remains at 13 per cent in 2008) (Instituto da Droga e da Toxicodepende ˆncia 2009).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Instituto da Droga e da Toxicodepende ˆncia 2009
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingown data
Portuguese trends in reported drug use largely mimicked those in Spain and Italy.
“Portuguese trends largely mimicked the trends observed in neighbouring Spain and Italy (see Tables 3 and 4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
The estimated prevalence of injecting drug use in Portugal fell from a mean of 3.5 to 2.0 per 1,000 population aged 15-64 between 2000 and 2005.
“The more significant finding was a fall in the estimated prevalence of injecting drug use (from a mean of 3.5 to 2.0 injecting drug users per 1,000 population aged 15-64 or a range of 2.3-4.6 to 1.8-2.2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Negreiros and Magalha ˜es (2009)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingcitation
The increase in reported drug use was seen in all age groups above 19.
“The increase was seen in all age groups above 19 (Balsa et al. 2004;2007).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Balsa et al. 2004;2007
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingcitation
A prison survey found that between 2001 and 2007, the number of drug users and the general rate of drug use within Portuguese prisons fell significantly.
“A survey of drug use and related problems in prison found that between 2001 and 2007, the numbers of drug users and general rate of drug use within prisons had fallen significantly (Torres 2009).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Torres 2009
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingown data
Drug-related deaths peaked earlier in Italy (1996) than in Portugal and Spain (1999).
“The peak number of drug-related deaths occurred earlier in Italy, in 1996, whereas both Portugal and Spain did not peak until 1999.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
The effects of Portuguese reforms appeared much less positive in the early years, when implementation was more problematic.
“The effects of the Portuguese reforms appeared much less positive during the early years, when implementation was more problematic (Hughes and Stevens 2007).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hughes and Stevens 2007
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingnone given
The amounts of drugs seized by Portuguese authorities increased after decriminalization.
“increases in the amounts of drugs seized by the authorities”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
The proportion of Portuguese deaths with opiates as the main substance declined from 95% in 1999 to 59% in 2008 (55% in 2007).
“The proportion of deaths in which opiates were the main substance in Portugal has continued on an almost steady decline from 95 per cent in 1999 to 59 per cent in 2008 (55 per cent in 2007).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Instituto da Droga e da Toxicodepende ˆncia 2009
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingcitation
In contrast to Portugal, Spain showed almost linear growth in cocaine and hashish seizure amounts.
“This is remarkably different from trends in Spain (see Figure 5), where there has been an almost linear growth in cocaine and hashish seizure amounts (EMCDDA 2009b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites EMCDDA 2009b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingown data
School surveys provide some indications of reduced use of cannabis, cocaine, and ecstasy.
“There are some indications from the school surveys of reduced use of cannabis, cocaine and ecstasy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Retail prices of drugs in Portugal decreased after decriminalization.
“reductions in the retail prices of drugs”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Uptake of drug treatment in Portugal increased after decriminalization.
“increased uptake of drug treatment”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
The Prime Minister used the speech to publicly boast of his decisive role in introducing the 2001 reform.
“He used this opportunity to boast publicly of his decisive role in the introduction of the 2001 reform.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites So ´crates 2009
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingown data
Illicit drug use among problematic drug users and adolescents in Portugal decreased after decriminalization, at least from 2003 onward.
“reduced illicit drug use among problematic drug users and adolescents, at least since 2003”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
Data on outpatient, inpatient, and prescribed treatment clients indicate that the Portuguese drug-using population has aged.
“The data on treatment clients-outpatient, inpatient and prescribed-all indicate that the population of drug users has aged.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
The number of new drug users diagnosed with HIV and AIDS in Portugal has declined.
“The number of new drug users who are diagnosed with HIV and AIDS has also declined.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
The number of drug users in treatment in Portugal expanded from 23,654 to 38,532 between 1998 and 2008.
“The overall numbers of drug users in treatment expanded in Portugal from 23,654 to 38,532 between 1998and 2008(Instituto da Droga e da Toxicodepende ˆncia 2009).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Instituto da Droga e da Toxicodepende ˆncia 2009
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingnone given
The burden of drug offenders on the Portuguese criminal justice system decreased after decriminalization.
“reduced burden of drug offenders on the criminal justice system”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
The proportion of first-time treatment clients aged over 34 increased from 23% in 2000 to 46% in 2008.
“For example, in 2000, only 23 per cent of treatment clients admitted for the first time were aged over 34, but this rate has increased steadily to a rate of 46 per cent in 2008 (Instituto da Droga e da Toxicodepende ˆncia 2009).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Instituto da Droga e da Toxicodepende ˆncia 2009
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingcitation
Spain also saw a reduction in drug-related AIDS cases, from 5,085 in 1994 to 639 in 2007, following scaled-up opiate substitution treatment.
“A reduction in drug-related AIDS cases was also seen in Spain (from 5,085 cases in 1994 to 639 in 2007) following the scaling up of opiate substitution treatment (Brugal et al. 2005).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Brugal et al. 2005 source
- Findingcitation
Reported illicit drug use among Portuguese adults increased slightly after the July 2001 decriminalization.
“small increases in reported illicit drug use amongst adults”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Balsa et al. (2004; 2007)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingcitation
In Portugal, the amounts of drugs seized did not increase linearly or constantly.
“In particular, they reveal that in Portugal, there has not been a linear or constant increase in the amounts seized (Instituto da Droga e da Toxicodepende ˆncia 2009).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Instituto da Droga e da Toxicodepende ˆncia 2009
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingnone given
In contrast to Portugal, most retail drug prices in Spain have been stable.
“The declines in Portugal were somewhat different from neighbouring Spain (see Table 6), where most retail drug prices have been stable.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Trends in drug-related deaths differ among Portugal, Italy, and Spain, reflecting in part different stages of the heroin epidemic.
“Looking at neighbouring Italy and Spain, it is clear that trends in drug-related deaths differ between the three nations, which reflect in part different stages of the heroin epidemic (see Figure 7).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
Prices of most substances in Portugal decreased, particularly from 2001 levels.
“At the same time, there have been reductions in the prices of most substances, particularly from 2001 levels.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
Many offenders in Portugal received no formal action, whether by sanction or referral for treatment.
“the end result is that many offenders received no 'formal' action, whether by way of sanction or referral for treatment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
There are no signs of mass expansion of the drug market in Portugal.
“there are no signs of mass expansion of the drug market in Portugal”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Most studies have found no significant increases in drug use following decriminalization.
“Most studies have found there are no significant increases in use (e.g.Donnelly et al. 1995;1999;Featherston and Lenton 2007).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Donnelly et al. 1995 source
- cites [1999]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Featherston and Lenton 2007
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
The ten-day limit amounts in practice to 0.1 g heroin, 0.1 g ecstasy, 0.1 g amphetamines, 0.2 g cocaine or 2.5 g cannabis.
“This amounts in practice to 0.1 g heroin, 0.1 g ecstasy, 0.1 g amphetamines, 0.2 g cocaine or 2.5 g cannabis (Decreto-Lei n.° 15/93, de 22 de janeiro 1993; Portaria n.° 94/96, de 26 de Marc xo 1996).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Decreto-Lei n.° 15/93
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Portaria n.° 94/96
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
The South Australian scheme led to net-widening, with more people receiving formal contact with the criminal justice system than before.
“Yet, it also led to net-widening.More people received formal contact with the criminal justice system than prior to the reform (Sutton and McMillan 1998).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sutton and McMillan 1998
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Between 1990 and 1997, the number of known drug users living with AIDS in Portugal increased from 47 to 590.
“For example, between 1990 and 1997, the number of known drug users living with AIDS increased from 47 to 590 (Instituto da Droga e da Toxicodepende ˆncia 2004b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Instituto da Droga e da Toxicodepende ˆncia 2004b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Portugal decriminalized the use and possession of all illicit drugs on 1 July 2001.
“This paper examines the case of Portugal, a nation that decriminalized the use and possession of all illicit drugs on 1 July 2001.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lei n.° 30/2000
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
With Law 30/2000, drug possession and acquisition became a public order or administrative offence.
“But with the introduction of Law 30/2000, drug possession and acquisition became a public order or administrative offence (Lei n.° 30/ 2000, de 29 de novembro 2000).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lei n.° 30/2000
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
It is difficult to make certain judgments on the effects of decriminalization on drug use due to absence of adequate comparators.
“Still others have shown how difficult it is to make any certain judgment on the effects of decriminalization on drug use, given the absence of adequate comparators (Pacula et al. 2004;Hughes 2009).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Pacula et al. 2004
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Hughes 2009
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Prior to the 2001 reform, drug possession, acquisition and cultivation for personal use were criminal offences punishable with up to 1 year's imprisonment.
“Prior to the 2001 reform, drug possession, acquisition and cultivation when for personal use were criminal offences punishable with up to 1 year's imprisonment (Decreto-Lei no.° 15/93, de 22 de janeiro 1993).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Decreto-Lei no.° 15/93, de 22 de janeiro 1993
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
A key rationale for the Portuguese reform was to provide a more health-oriented response, including referral of dependent drug users into treatment.
“Equally importantly, one key rationale for the reform was to provide a more health-oriented response, including the possibility to refer people who are dependent on drugs into treatment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Comissa ˜o para a Estrate ´gia Nacional de Combate a `Droga 1998
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationown data
These trends reflect trends in drug use, particularly a decline in heroin use.
“These reflect trends in drug use, particularly a decline in heroin use (see below).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The similarity of general population and youth trends across Portugal, Italy, and Spain supports the argument that increases in reported general population use in Portugal reflect regional trends and are not solely attributable to decriminalization.
“The similarity in general population and youth trends in Portugal, Italy and Spain adds support for the argument that reported increases in general population use in Portugal reflect regional trends and thus are not solely attributable to the decriminalization.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning
It is impossible to attribute any changes in drug use or related harm directly to the fact or form of the Portuguese decriminalization.
“All these challenges make it impossible to attribute any changes in drug use or related harm directly to the fact or form of the Portuguese decriminalization.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning
Implementation of the national plan and decriminalization has not been constant.
“Moreover, implementation of the national plan and decriminalization has not been constant.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The data suggest that Portuguese decriminalization may have increased police or court efficiency by reducing crowding with drug offenders.
“The data thus suggest that the Portuguese decriminalization may have increased efficiency of police or court operations as they became less crowded with drug offenders.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The similarity of Portuguese trends to neighboring countries provides little evidence that increases in reported drug use were directly attributable to decriminalization.
“The congruity with the other data from neighbouring nations provides little evidence that any apparent increases were directly attributable to the decriminalization.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Portugal being the only one of these nations to show declines in problematic drug use provides strong evidence that Portuguese decriminalization has not increased the most harmful forms of drug use.
“Moreover, the fact that Portugal is the only of these nations to have exhibited declines in PDU provides strong evidence that the Portuguese decriminalization has not increased the most harmful forms of drug use.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning
The comparators fall into the same geographic region, allowing for detection of regional trends.
“The comparators fall into the same geographic region, thereby allowing for the detection of regional trends.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Qualitative data from Portuguese annual reports provide further evidence of high-level law enforcement activities.
“Qualitative data from the Portuguese annual reports provide further evidence of highlevel law enforcement activities.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
There are several forms of decriminalization in practice internationally.
“But there are several forms of decriminalization in practice internationally (Uitermark 2004;McLaren and Mattick 2007;Babor et al. 2010).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Uitermark 2004;McLaren and Mattick 2007;Babor et al. 2010
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
All three nations have undertaken criminal justice changes to reduce state criminalization.
“And all have undertaken changes within the criminal justice arena to reduce criminalization by the state (Solivetti 2001;Gamella and Jime ´nez Rodrigo 2004).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Solivetti 2001;Gamella and Jime ´nez Rodrigo 2004
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationown data
Decriminalization can reduce the burden on the criminal justice system.
“It can reduce the burden upon the criminal justice system.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Penal populism was evidently not in play in Portugal.
“Penal populism was evidently not in play here.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Reductions in opiate-related deaths likely reflect increased provision and uptake of treatment, especially low-threshold opiate substitution, and not simply decriminalization.
“Reductions in opiate-related deaths are likely to reflect the large increase in the provision and uptake of treatment, particularly low-threshold opiate substitution treatments, 14 and not simply the effect of decriminalization.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The appeal of the punitive turn in contemporary penality is not universal.
“The appeal of the punitive turn in contemporary penality is by no means universal.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The pattern of seizures in Portugal-no consistent growth in one product but spikes across different products-is more consistent with increased law enforcement intervention than with domestic market growth.
“The absence in Portugal of a consistent growth, in one product, and instead seizures of a number of different products is much more in line with evidence of increased law enforcement intervention as opposed to domestic growth in the market (as per the Spanish trends).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Portugal, which extended the welfare state and reduced penalization of vulnerable drug users, supports critics who argue that general theorizing about punitive turn underestimates complexity.
“The counter-example of Portugal, which has seen both an extension of the welfare state and a reduction in the penalization of vulnerable drug users, supports critics who have argued that such general theorizing underestimates the complexity of developments, both at home and abroad (Hannah-Moffatt 2002;Zedner 2002;Young 2003;Loader and Sparks 2004;Hutchinson 2006).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hannah-Moffatt 2002;Zedner 2002;Young 2003;Loader and Sparks 2004;Hutchinson 2006
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
These difficulties make it harder to compare impacts at a given time against potential future impacts of decriminalization.
“These difficulties make it harder to compare impacts at a given time against the potential future impacts of decriminalization.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The Portuguese reform demonstrates that, contrary to some predictions, decriminalization does not inevitably lead to rises in drug use.
“It demonstrates that-contrary to some predictions-decriminalization does not inevitably lead to rises in drug use.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
These indicators suggest that the Portuguese drug market, especially local use, did not become rampant after decriminalization.
“These indicators indicate that the Portuguese drug market, particularly local use of the drug market, does not appear to have become rampant post decriminalization.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Decriminalization can contribute to social and health benefits.
“It can further contribute to social and health benefits.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
Southern European countries including Portugal, Italy, and Spain have followed a different path from neoliberal Anglo-Saxon economies.
“Southern-European countries including Portugal, Italy and Spain have followed a different path from the neo-liberal, Anglo-Saxon economies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Together with the decline in problematic drug use, the aging of treatment clients suggests a reduction in the number of young people becoming dependent on illicit drugs such as heroin.
“Together with the data on the decline in the prevalence of problematic drug use, this suggests an encouraging trend of reductions in the number of young people who are becoming dependent on illicit drugs such as heroin.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Many other factors, including expanded treatment services and an aging population of heroin users, contributed to the positive results observed in Portugal.
“Many other factors, including expanded treatment services and an ageing population of heroin users, have contributed to the positive results observed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Decriminalization does not eliminate all drug-related problems.
“Nor does it eliminate all drug-related problems.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Combining removal of criminal penalties with alternative therapeutic responses to dependent drug users offers several advantages.
“The Portuguese evidence suggests that combining the removal of criminal penalties with the use of alternative therapeutic responses to dependent drug users offers several advantages.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The small increases in adult drug use in Portugal were not produced solely by the 2001 decriminalization, based on the regional context.
“While small increases in drug use were reported by Portuguese adults, the regional context of this trend suggests that they were not produced solely by the 2001 decriminalization.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The paper's information disconfirms the hypothesis that decriminalization necessarily leads to increases in the most harmful forms of drug use.
“It disconfirms the hypothesis that decriminalization necessarily leads to increases in the most harmful forms of drug use.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
The apparent increase in heroin use in Portugal between 2003 and 2007 is within the statistical margin of error of the survey.
“The apparent increase in the use of heroin between 2003 and 2007 is within the statistical margin for error of this survey.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
It is impossible to state that any of the observed changes were the direct result of the decriminalization policy.
“it is impossible to state that any of these changes were the direct result of the decriminalization policy”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Some effects of decriminalization appear to be specific to Portugal.
“some effects do appear to be specific to Portugal”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The trends in Spain and Italy provide a valid comparison to isolate effects specific to Portugal.
- Interpretationreasoning
Decriminalization of illicit drug use and possession does not appear to lead automatically to an increase in drug-related harms.
“decriminalization of illicit drug use and possession does not appear to lead automatically to an increase in drug-related harms”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 52
- May combine two claims. 59
- The quote only partly states this claim. 2
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationRemoval of criminal penalties appeared to produce positive but slight impacts.
“They concluded that the removal of criminal penalties appeared to produce positive but slight impacts.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites MacCoun and Reuter 2001a source
The Abstract (page unavailable) argues for decriminalising cannabis possession because it does not appear to increase drug prevalence. In “The basis for continued cannabis prohibition” (page unavailable), the authors also describe prohibition as harmful and costly. These passages support a favorable assessment of removing criminal penalties, but they do not characterize its positive impacts as slight. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBest-practice evidence suggests that the most effective treatment response for cannabis-dependent users is a brief intervention involving six sessions of cognitive behavioural therapy, which is not currently provided in Portugal.
“Best-practice evidence suggests that the most effective treatment response for cannabis-dependent users is a 'brief intervention' involving six sessions of cognitive behavioural therapy, yet this is not currently provided in Portugal (see, e.g.Copeland et al. 2001).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Copeland et al. 2001 source
The Discussion reports better outcomes for both one- and six-session CBT than for delayed treatment, and greater reductions in cannabis consumption and dependence with six sessions. It also reports no significant difference between the two interventions on several other outcomes, so the trial does not establish six-session CBT as the most effective treatment overall. The cited passages do not address whether it was provided in Portugal. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationA particular risk in cross-national policy analysis is ethnocentrism over definitions of key terms and policy rationales.
“For example, Nelken (2009) has argued that one particular risk is of ethnocentrism over definitions of key terms and policy rationales.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Nelken 2009 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataKey informants identified decisions not to replace retiring core CDT staff as the biggest challenge to understanding long-term effects of the reform.
“For key informants, the biggest challenge in understanding the long-term effects of the reform has been a series of decisions to not replace core CDT staff if they retired.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe number of finalized CDT processes decreased between 2003 and 2006, with the proportion of cases receiving an administrative sanction declining from 75 per cent in 2003 to 48 per cent in 2006.
“The number of processes that have been decided upon or 'finalized' decreased between 2003 and 2006, which meant there was an overall decline in the proportion of cases in which drug users received an administrative sanction from the CDTs (from 75 per cent in 2003 to 48 per cent in 2006).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenMost referred drug users are male (94 per cent) and between ages 16-24 (47 per cent) and 25-34 (31 per cent).
“Most of the referred drug users are male (94 per cent) and between the ages of 16-24 (47 per cent) and 25-34 (31 per cent).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenAs of mid 2008, all CDTs except Vila Real were back in operation.
“As of mid 2008, all CDTs, with the exception of Vila Real, were back in operation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationIn Spain, the burden on police grew due to large increases in administrative detections for drug use/possession since 1998 and smaller increases in criminal detections for drug trafficking since 2004.
“This is a notable finding in light of the data from Spain (see Figure 3), where the burden on the police has grown as a result of large increases in the number of offenders detected through the administrative system for drug use/possession (since 1998) and smaller increases in detections through the criminal system for drug trafficking (since 2004) (Reitox National Focal Point 2008).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Reitox National Focal Point 2008
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). The quote only partly states this claim.
FindingreasoningStakeholders reported that the CDTs provided a broader range of responses.
“the provision of a broader range of responses;”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningStakeholders said the full potential of the reform had not been reached due to lack of full staff in all CDTs and lack of appropriate interventions for young and occasional drug users.
“But, due to the problems cited above, namely the lack of full staff in all CDTs and the lack of appropriate interventions to which to refer young and occasional drug users, stakeholders said the full potential of the reform had not been reached.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationSince 2002, the CDTs have initiated about 6,000 administrative processes against drug users per year, trending upwards to 6,543 processes in 2008.
“Since 2002, the CDTs have initiated about 6,000 administrative processes against drug users per year, with the number trending upwards to 6,543 processes in 2008 (Instituto da Droga e da Toxicodepende ˆncia 2009).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Instituto da Droga e da Toxicodepende ˆncia 2009
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe youth trends in Portugal were similar to those in Italy and Europe, except the 2003-07 decline in any illicit substance use was more pronounced in Portugal and the decline in cannabis use was less pronounced.
“This was very similar to the trends observed in Italy and in broader Europe, with the major differences being that the 2003-07 decline in reported use of any illicit substance appears more pronounced in Portugal and the decline in reported cannabis use appears less pronounced in Portugal.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenOnly 5-6 per cent of offenders have been referred to a CDT twice in any one year.
“For example, while it is known that only 5-6 per cent of offenders have been referred to a CDT twice in any one year,”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataPortugal, Spain, and Italy all reported increases in lifetime prevalence of hashish, amphetamines, and cocaine, and in past-year prevalence of cannabis and cocaine.
“All three nations reported increases in lifetime prevalence of hashish, amphetamines and cocaine as well as increases in the last year prevalence of cannabis and cocaine use.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
FindingreasoningStakeholders reported that the CDTs increased provision of treatment and harm-reduction services for experienced and dependent users.
“and increased provision of treatment and harm-reduction services for experienced and dependent users.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe quantity of illicit drugs seized in Portugal increased overall, especially drugs destined for external markets.
“But there has been an overall increase in the quantity of illicit drugs seized, particularly those destined for external markets.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationOther drug-linked thefts, such as assaults/robberies from post offices and thefts from homes and businesses, declined by 60%, 8%, and 10%, respectively.
“Conversely, other forms of theft such as assaults/robberies from post offices and thefts from homes and businesses (which were deemed strongly linked to drugs) declined by 60, 8 and 10 per cent, respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Direcc xa ˜o Central de Investigac xa ˜o do Tra ´fico de Estupefacientes 2004
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationRates of intravenous drug use before and inside prison fell, as did HIV prevalence among prisoners.
“Rates of intravenous use before and inside prison had also fallen, as had the prevalence of HIV amongst prisoners.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Torres 2009
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe central police report concluded that opportunistic crimes increased while more complex, premeditated, and potentially violent crimes decreased.
“The report by the central police agencies concluded that there had been an increase in more opportunistic crimes but a reduction in crimes that were more complex, pre-mediated and likely to involve threats or use of violence (Direcc xa ˜o Central de Investigac xa ˜o do Tra ´fico de Estupefacientes 2004).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Direcc xa ˜o Central de Investigac xa ˜o do Tra ´fico de Estupefacientes 2004
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationIn Spain, although problem opiate users declined, estimates from 2006 suggest overall problematic drug users may have increased due to more problematic cocaine users.
“Even in Spain, where the number of problem opiate users is estimated to have declined, estimates from 2006 suggest the overall number of problematic drug users may also have increased, due to an increase in the number of problematic cocaine users (Reitox National Focal Point 2008).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Reitox National Focal Point 2008
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). The quote only partly states this claim.
FindingreasoningStakeholders reported that the CDTs increased emphasis on prevention for occasional users.
“increased emphasis on prevention for occasional users;”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenKey stakeholders in Portugal were in general agreement that there have been small to moderate increases in overall reported drug use among adults.
“Key stakeholders in Portugal were in general agreement that there has been small to moderate increases in overall reported drug use among adults.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationBetween 1995-99 and 2000-04, the amount of drugs seized increased by 499% overall: cocaine 116%, hashish 134%, heroin 219%, and ecstasy 1,526%.
“As one of the evaluation reports noted between 1995-99 and 2000-04, the amount of drugs seized increased by 499 per cent: 116 per cent for cocaine, 134 per cent for hashish, 219 per cent for heroin and 1,526 per cent for ecstasy (Direcc xa ˜o Central de Investigac xa ˜o do Tra ´fico de Estupefacientes 2004).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Direcc xa ˜o Central de Investigac xa ˜o do Tra ´fico de Estupefacientes 2004
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenStakeholders reported that the CDTs provided earlier intervention for drug users by a specialist panel of experts.
“According to the stakeholders that we interviewed, the CDTs provided a number of advantages, including: earlier intervention for drug users by a specialist panel of experts;”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenIn Spain, cocaine replaced heroin as the major cause of hospital admission and is the second most likely drug associated with death.
“For example, in Spain, cocaine has taken over from heroin as the major cause of hospital admission and is the second most likely drug to be associated with death.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingcitationIn the run-up to the 2009 general election, the incumbent Prime Minister gave a speech in Lisbon at the EMCDDA.
“In the run-up to the 2009 general election, the incumbent Prime Minister gave a speech in Lisbon at the European Monitoring Centre on Drugs and Drug Addiction (So ´crates 2009).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites So ´crates 2009
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationItaly showed relatively flat seizure trends with no discernible spikes in hashish or ecstasy quantities since 1999/2000.
“It is also different from Italy (see Figure 6), where there had been relatively flat trends with no discernable spikes in hashish or ecstasy seizure quantities since 1999/2000.12”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites EMCDDA 2009b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationAmong drug users in Portugal, HIV cases fell from 907 to 267 and AIDS cases from 506 to 108 between 2000 and 2008.
“For example, between 2000 and 2008, the number of cases of HIV reduced amongst drug users from 907 to 267 and the number of cases of AIDS reduced from 506 to 108 (Instituto da Droga e da Toxicodepende ˆncia 2009).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Instituto da Droga e da Toxicodepende ˆncia 2009
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenOpiate-related deaths and infectious diseases in Portugal decreased after decriminalization.
“reduction in opiate-related deaths and infectious diseases”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThere have been significant reductions in mortality, HIV, HCV, and TB in Portugal.
“There have been significant reductions in mortality, HIV, HCV and TB.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAll three nations showed a plateau in drug-related deaths in the mid-2000s, but only Portugal had a recent increase.
“All three nations showed a plateau in the mid 2000s but Portugal is unique in the recent increase.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingcitationSpanish experts suggested the lack of change was due to greater-than-estimated cocaine supply in Spain.
“Spanish experts therefore have suggested the lack of change is due to greater-thanestimated levels of cocaine supply in Spain (Reitox National Focal Point 2008).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Reitox National Focal Point 2008
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataSeizures spiked for different substances: ecstasy in 2001-2003, hashish in 2003-2006, cocaine in 2004-2006, and larger hashish quantities in 2007-2008.
“Instead, there have been spikes in seizures of a number of different substances with large seizures of ecstasy between 2001 and 2003, hashish between 2003 and 2006, cocaine between 2004 and 2006 and even larger quantities of hashish between 2007 and 2008 (see Figure 4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe average price of 1 gram of heroin fell from $50.27 in 2001 to $33.25 in 2008, and an ecstasy tablet fell from $6.86 to $2.80.
“For example, the reported average price of 1 gram of heroin decreased from $50.27 in 2001 to $33.25 in 2008 and the average price of an ecstasy tablet fell from $6.86 in 2001 to $2.80 in 2008 (see Table 5).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingcitationThe Prime Minister pledged continuing support for the reform.
“He pledged his continuing support for it.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites So ´crates 2009
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationOther jurisdictions such as Western Australia have not been so fortunate and are overturning a hard-fought-for reform.
“Other jurisdictions such as Western Australia have not been so fortunate, and are in the process of overturning a hard-fought-for reform (Barrett 2009).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Barrett 2009
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataSince Portugal introduced its drug strategy and decriminalization, all three nations showed declines in drug-related deaths, with declines more pronounced in Portugal and Italy than in Spain.
“That aside, it is clear that since the Portuguese introduction of its drug strategy and the decriminalization, all three nations showed declines in drug-related deaths, but that the declines were more pronounced in Portugal and Italy than in Spain.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenDrug-related deaths due to cocaine and other substances rose in Spain but not in Portugal.
“Other forms of drug-related deaths, especially due to cocaine, have risen in Spain but not Portugal.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningThe exception in Spain is hash, whose retail prices increased since 2001, argued to be in line with increasing demand.
“The exception is hash, as retail prices have increased since 2001, which is argued to be in line with increasing demand.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenThe trend in Portugal is similar to that observed in Eastern Europe, such as Croatia and Slovenia.
“The trend in Portugal is similar to that observed in Eastern Europe, such as Croatia and Slovenia.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningThe reduction in problematic drug users and the reduction in burden of drug offenders on the criminal justice system in Portugal contrasted directly with trends in neighbouring Spain and Italy.
“the reduction in problematic drug users and reduction in burden of drug offenders on the criminal justice system were in direct contrast to those trends observed in neighbouring Spain and Italy”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The trends in Spain and Italy provide a valid comparison to isolate effects specific to Portugal.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenInternationally, Portugal has gone furthest in emphasizing treatment as an alternative to prosecution.
“Internationally, Portugal has gone furthest in emphasizing treatment as an alternative to prosecution.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenIn Portugal, imprisonment for drug use or possession alone was rare, but criminal convictions were the norm.
“In practice, it was rare that people were imprisoned for drug use/possession alone, but criminal convictions were the norm.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenNeighbouring Spain apparently experienced market expansions.
“This is in contrast with apparent market expansions in neighbouring Spain.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThere was a 280 per cent increase in expiable cannabis offences in South Australia, increasing the burden on the criminal justice system.
“In fact, there was a 280 per cent increase in expiable cannabis offences, which meant there was an overall increase in the burden on the criminal justice system (Christie and Ali 2000).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Christie and Ali 2000
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIn 2001, only 7.8 per cent of 15-64-year-olds in Portugal had ever used an illicit drug.
“In 2001, only 7.8 per cent of 15-64-year-olds in Portugal had ever used an illicit drug (Balsa et al. 2004).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Balsa et al. 2004
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe new law applies to use/possession of all illicit drugs, including cannabis, heroin and cocaine, but is restricted to up to ten days' worth of a drug.
“The new law applies to use/possession of all illicit drugs-including cannabis, heroin and cocaine-but it is restricted to use/possession of up to ten days' worth of a drug.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Decreto-Lei n.° 15/93
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Portaria n.° 94/96
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe decriminalization entered into force on 1 July 2001.
“Subsequently, on 1 July 2001, the decriminalization entered into force.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lei n.° 30/2000
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBy 1999, Portugal had the highest rate of drug-related AIDS in the European Union and the second highest prevalence of HIV amongst injecting drug users.
“By 1999, Portugal had the highest rate of drug-related AIDS in the European Union and the second highest prevalence of HIV amongst injecting drug users (EMCDDA 2000).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites EMCDDA 2000
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationA government-appointed expert commission proposed to decriminalize illicit drugs for personal use and to introduce Portugal's first national drug strategy with the goal of a more comprehensive and evidence-informed approach.
“It was within this contextfoot_1 that a government-appointed expert commission proposed to decriminalize illicit drugs for personal use and to introduce Portugal's first national drug strategy, which had the explicit goal of providing a more comprehensive and evidence-informed approach to drug use (Comissa ˜o para a Estrate ´gia Nacional de Combate a `Droga 1998).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Comissa ˜o para a Estrate ´gia Nacional de Combate a `Droga 1998
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe South Australian cannabis expiation notice scheme led to increased employment prospects and increased trust of police.
“Evaluators found that 'decriminalization' led to increased employment prospects and increased trust of police (Lenton et al. 1999).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lenton et al. 1999
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBoth sets of recommendations were adopted almost in full, and Portugal commenced the national strategy and expanded resources in May 1999.
“Both sets of recommendations were adopted almost in full (for full details, see Hughes 2006) and Portugal commenced their ambitious reform by rolling out the national strategy and expanded resources in May 1999.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hughes 2006
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe new offences are sanctioned through Commissions for the Dissuasion of Drug Addiction (CDTs).
“The new offences are sanctioned through specially devised Commissions for the Dissuasion of Drug Addiction (CDTs).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lei n.° 30/2000
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIn 2001/02, 34 per cent of 16-59-year-olds in the United Kingdom had used an illicit drug.
“In contrast, the British Crime Survey reported that in 2001/02, 34 per cent of 16-59-yearolds in the United Kingdom had used an illicit drug (Aust et al. 2002).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Aust et al. 2002
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe Portuguese reform is a comprehensive form of decriminalization, with possession of all drugs for personal use considered an administrative rather than criminal offence.
“The Portuguese reform warrants particular attention, as it is a comprehensive form of decriminalization, with the possession of all drugs, when deemed for personal use, 1 now considered to be an administrative rather than a criminal offence.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lei n.° 30/2000
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSome studies have found a slight increase in drug use following decriminalization.
“Others have found a slight increase (e.g.Williams 2004; Zhao and Harris 2004;Damrongplasit et al. 2010).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThere was growing concern over social exclusion and marginalization of drug users, and a perception among law enforcement and health sectors that criminalization of drug use was part of the problem.
“There was also growing concern over the social exclusion and marginalization of drug users, and a perception from many areas of society including the law enforcement and health sectors that the criminalization of drug use was increasingly part of the problem, not the solution (Hughes 2006).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hughes 2006
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationDrug-related deaths in Portugal increased to a peak of 369 in 1999, an increase of 57 per cent since 1997.
“Drug-related deaths had increased in Portugal to a peak of 369 in 1999 (an increase of 57 per cent since 1997) (Instituto Portugue ˆs da Droga e da Toxicodepende ˆncia 2000).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Instituto Portugue ˆs da Droga e da Toxicodepende ˆncia 2000
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationItaly and Spain introduced administrative sanctions for drug use in 1990 and 1992, respectively, and neither implemented radical overhauls during the study period.
“Moreover, while Italy and Spain have adopted similar drug policies, namely by introducing administrative sanctions for drug use in 1990 and 1992, respectively (for an overview, see EMCDDA 2005), neither country implemented any radical overhauls during the period of study (Reitox National Focal Point 2008;EMCDDA 2009a).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites EMCDDA 2005
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Reitox National Focal Point 2008
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites EMCDDA 2009a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningDecriminalization was deemed to have played a vital role in the advantages of the CDTs, though these advantages were often dependent on increased collaboration and expansion of treatment places.
“While these advantages were often dependent upon the conjoint increase in collaboration and expansion of treatment places, decriminalization was deemed to have played a vital role.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe impacts of decriminalization, particularly the actions of the CDTs, were contingent upon the operation of other organizations, including police and drug treatment services.
“Further limitations were that the impacts of decriminalization-particularly the actions of the CDTs-were also contingent upon the operation of a number of other organizations, including the police and drug treatment services.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningThe authors used annual EMCDDA data to compare Portuguese trends with trends from Spain and/or Italy, subject to data availability.
“We have therefore used annual data reported to the EMCDDA to analyse Portuguese trends in light of trends from neighbouring Spain and/or Italy, subject to data availability.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningInterview data were not intended to reflect the full range of public, professional and political opinion but to supplement and interrogate national documentation.
“Our intention is not to present the interview data as reflecting the full range of public, professional and political opinion, but to use it to supplement and interrogate the data collected from the national documentation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningComparing Portuguese trends with those of nations that did not undertake the reform counters the absence of a control comparison.
“One way of countering this is by comparing trends from the chosen nation (Portugal) with that of nations that did not undertake the reform.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningWhile general population trends in Portugal show slight increases in lifetime and recent illicit drug use, studies of youth and problematic drug users show declines.
“Thus, while general population trends in Portugal suggest slight increases in lifetime and recent illicit drug use, studies of young and problematic drug users suggest that use has declined.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationIndividuals found with more than the consumer amount will be charged and referred to the courts, where they may face charges for trafficking or trafficking/consumption.
“Individuals found with more than this quantity will be charged and referred to the courts, where they may face charges for trafficking or trafficking/consumption (where the offender is found in possession of more than the consumer amount, but deemed to have obtained plants, substances or preparations for personal use only) (Decreto-Lei n.° 15/93, de 22 de janeiro 1993).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Decreto-Lei n.° 15/93
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataNo member of the criminal justice system was willing or able to participate in the interviews, though a former police officer and a CDT overseer could comment on criminal justice issues.
“While no member of the criminal justice system was willing/able to take part, one stakeholder was a former police officer and another an overseer of CDT implementation; both were able to comment on criminal justice-related issues.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe constant number of administrative detections indicates no overall increase in formal contact between drug offenders and Portuguese police and no net-widening.
“Equally importantly, the number of people detected under the new law for administrative drug use/possession offences has remained fairly constant at about 6,000 per year, thereby indicating no overall increase in the amount of formal contact that drug offenders are having with Portuguese police and so no net-widening.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAlthough trends from Spain and Italy are unknown, the evidence suggests that even if drug-related crime increased slightly immediately after the reform, the overall burden of drug-related offenders on the criminal justice system decreased.
“Trends from Spain and Italy are not known, but this further suggests that even if there were small increases in drug-related crime immediately following the reform, there have been overall reductions in the burden of drug-related offenders on the criminal justice system.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThe authors' proficiency in Portuguese, collaboration with IDT, and use of IDT support and feedback should reduce the risk of external bias.
“During this process, the primary author had become proficient in reading and speaking Portuguese and collaborated with the IDT.Research for the existing research also utilized the support and feedback from those based in the IDT.These measures should reduce the risk of external bias.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThe decline in Portuguese problematic drug use is notable because Italy's number of problematic drug users is thought to have increased.
“This trend is notable given that the number of problematic drug users in Italy is thought to have gone in the opposite direction.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe authors were unable to interview police or criminal justice representatives.
“The sample size was not large enough to reach data saturation and neither were we able to interview police or criminal justice representatives.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe absence of a control comparison is the most important limitation for evaluating national drug policy; there is no counterfactual Portugal that did not decriminalize in 2001.
“The most important for any evaluation of national drug policy is the absence of a control comparison; there is no counterfactual Portugal, which did not decriminalize drugs in 2001.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningThe authors' research suggests that current theories and assumptions about decriminalization need development.
“Our research suggests that current theories and assumptions about decriminalization are themselves in need of development.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Decriminalization is often discussed as if it is one simple, unitary concept.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisereasoningThe South Australian cannabis expiation notice scheme is one case in point.
“One case in point is the South Australian cannabis expiation notice scheme.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisenone givenWhen emerging from dictatorship, Portugal, Italy, and Spain adapted their constitutions to recognize citizenship rights and limit state interference in private life.
“When emerging from dictatorship, all three nations adapted their constitutions to recognize rights to citizenship and limit interference by the state in the private lives of citizens.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningPortuguese decriminalization stands in stark contrast to the punitive turn, having been adopted and continued for human rights, social solidarity, and recognition of punitive policy failure.
“Indeed, the Portuguese decriminalization stands in stark contrast to it, given its adoption and continuation for reasons of human rights, social solidarity and acknowledgement of the failure of punitive policies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThe lack of increase in Spanish cocaine prices and stable purity is argued to be odd because other indicators suggest cocaine demand increased.
“Indeed, the lack of increase in the price of cocaine in Spain (and stable purity) is argued to be odd, since other Spanish indicators suggest cocaine demand has been increasing.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningThe authors dispute Greenwald's tendency to attribute positive changes in Portugal to decriminalization alone.
“For example, we would dispute Greenwald's (2009) tendency to attribute positive changes in Portugal to decriminalization alone.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Greenwald's (2009) source
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningPortugal appears largely immune to cocaine-related deaths, with very low cocaine use, and decriminalization does not appear to have disturbed this pattern.
“Portugal would appear to have been largely immune to this, with very low levels of cocaine use, and the decriminalization would not appear to have disturbed this pattern.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThe major perceived success of the Portuguese reform has been its contribution to public health improvements, with significant early referrals of heroin users to treatment by CDTs.
“The major perceived success of the Portuguese reform has been its contribution to changes in public health problems, with significant referrals-particularly in the early years-by the CDTs of heroin users to treatment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningThe Portuguese reform provides important evidence for the debate on decriminalization impacts.
“Yet, the reform provides important evidence for the debate on the impacts of decriminalization.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenPortugal, Italy, and Spain all had totalitarian regimes in the last century.
“All had totalitarian regimes in the last century.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningBecause heroin problems drove the reform, key informants deemed the reduction in overdose and opiate-related deaths a considerable achievement of decriminalization and the broader drug strategy.
“Given that heroin problems were the major driver of the reform, this reduction in overdose and opiate-related death was deemed by key informants as a considerable achievement of both the decriminalization and the broader drug strategy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenOther difficulties were less controllable.
“Others were less controllable.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenSuch effects can be observed when decriminalizing all illicit drugs.
“Moreover, such affects can be observed when decriminalizing all illicit drugs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe reductions in drug prices may indicate either increased supply or reduced demand.
“The reductions in price may point to two phenomena: increased supply and reduced demand.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenNone of the other decriminalization models is as explicitly linked to dissuasion, treatment, and integration as the Portuguese approach.
“None of the other models is as explicitly linked to dissuasion, treatment and integration as the Portuguese approach.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningSome difficulties were an inevitable side effect of adopting a new reform.
“Some difficulties were an inevitable side effect of adopting a new reform.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn the first decade of this century, it has often been claimed that there is a general shift toward punitive penal policies and use of crime policies to legitimate neoliberal governance.
“In the first decade of this century, it has often been claimed that we are witnessing a general shift towards punitive penal policies and the use of crime policies to legitimate neoliberal governance (Garland 2001;Simon 2007).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Garland 2001;Simon 2007
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe drug price data suggest that reduced use was due to reduced demand rather than successful drug seizures, though more detailed studies are needed to confirm this.
“The drug price data suggest that this was due to reduced demand rather than the success in seizing drugs (which is supposed to limit drug use by reducing availability and increasing price), but more detailed studies would be needed to confirm this.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe authors' multi-year studies illustrate challenges in assessing decriminalization impacts and the importance of timing assessment relative to implementation.
“Our studies of the Portuguese decriminalization over a number of years have further illustrated the challenges in assessing the impacts from such a reform and the need to recognize the importance of the timing of assessment in relation to implementation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningIt remains unclear whether the observed impacts were influenced more by the policy or by its implementation.
“It also remains unclear whether the observed impacts were influenced more by the policy or its implementation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn 2007, an estimated 3.7 per cent of the Portuguese population aged 15-64 used any illicit drug in the last year, approximately 261,968 people.
“The 2007 data estimated 3.7 per cent population aged 15-64 used any illicit drug in the last year(Balsa et al. 2007) = approximately 261,968 people.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Balsa et al. 2007
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenData on last-year drug use was not collected in the European School Survey Project on Alcohol and other Drugs (ESPAD).
“Unfortunately, data on last-year use, a more relevant indicator of current drug usage patterns, was not collected in the European School survey Project on Alcohol and other Drugs (ESPAD).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThis estimate is similar to other estimates of criminal justice system intervention, which vary between 1 and 3 per cent.
“This estimate is similar to other estimates of CJS intervention, which vary between 1 and 3 per cent (see, e.g.Lenton 2000).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lenton 2000
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningCombining removal of criminal penalties with alternative therapeutic responses can reduce the burden of drug law enforcement on the criminal justice system while also reducing problematic drug use.
“It can reduce the burden of drug law enforcement on the criminal justice system, while also reducing problematic drug use.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningDecriminalization may offer a model for other nations wishing to provide less punitive, more integrated and effective responses to drug use.
“But it may offer a model for other nations that wish to provide less punitive, more integrated and effective responses to drug use.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The Portuguese experience is sufficiently relevant and transferable to serve as a model for other nations.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe small increases in adult drug use are less important than the major reductions in opiate-related deaths and infections and reductions in young people's drug use.
“We would argue that they are less important than the major reductions seen in opiate-related deaths and infections, as well as reductions in young people's drug use.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe increase in adult drug use in Portugal reflects regional shifts and/or expansion of services throughout Portugal.
“while some trends clearly reflect regional shifts (e.g. the increase in use amongst adults) and/or the expansion of services throughout Portugal”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
Most public arguments about drug decriminalization are based on speculation rather than available evidence.
“However, most public arguments are based on speculation rather than the available evidence on effects.”
The paper relies on this without support.
No reports on the Portuguese decriminalization have appeared in English peer-reviewed journals.
“but so far, no reports on it have appeared in English peer-reviewed journals.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The Portuguese reform has been in force long enough to measure its effects.
“The Portuguese reform has now been in force for almost nine years-time enough to measure the effects.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Drug use, market changes, and drug-related crime are notoriously hard to measure by any means.
“Drug use, market changes and drug-related crime is notoriously hard to measure by any means.”
The paper relies on this without support.
There are few data on which to assess the long-term impacts of the CDT process.
“There are few data on which to assess the long-term impacts of the CDT process.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Figures have not yet been collected on prior or subsequent offending and drug use amongst those referred through the CDTs.
“figures have not yet been collected on prior or subsequent offending and drug use amongst those referred through the CDTs.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The primary aim of the CDTs is to dissuade drug use and encourage dependent drug users into treatment.
“However, their primary aim is to dissuade drug use and to encourage dependent drug users into treatment.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The qualitative research sample size was not large enough to reach data saturation.
“The sample size was not large enough to reach data saturation”
The paper relies on this without support.
At the start of the decriminalization process and national drug strategy, problematic drug use was the major concern.
“Problematic drug use was the major concern at the commencement of the decriminalization process and national drug strategy.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Drug-related death counts are affected by changes in recording practices as well as underlying drug use rates.
“Drug-related deaths are subject to changes in recording as well as changes in underlying rates of drug use.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Decriminalization is often discussed as if it is one simple, unitary concept.
“Decriminalization is often discussed as if it is one, simple, unitary concept.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Decriminalization is commonly restricted to cannabis alone.
“This is important, as decriminalization is commonly restricted to cannabis alone.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Many reforms are evaluated only early in their adoption, which may lead to underestimation of their true impacts.
“Many reforms are evaluated only early on in their adoption, which may lead to underestimation of their true impacts.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The trends in Spain and Italy provide a valid comparison to isolate effects specific to Portugal.
“By comparing the trends in Portugal and neighbouring Spain and Italy, we can say that while some trends clearly reflect regional shifts”
The paper relies on this without support.
The Portuguese experience is sufficiently relevant and transferable to serve as a model for other nations.
“But it may offer a model for other nations that wish to provide less punitive, more integrated and effective responses to drug use.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The statistical indicators and key informant interviews reviewed are adequate to identify changes since decriminalization.
“the statistical indicators and key informant interviews that we have reviewed suggest that since decriminalization in July 2001, the following changes have occurred”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Conflicting 2001 lifetime drug-use prevalence
MinorThe text gives two different estimates for lifetime illicit drug use among Portuguese people aged 15-64 in 2001: 7.8% in the narrative and 7.6% in Table 1.
“In 2001, only 7.8 per cent of 15-64-year-olds in Portugal had ever used an illicit drug (Balsa et al. 2004).”
“| Any illicit substance | 7.6 | 12.0 | þ4.4 |”
Portuguese drug prices labeled as both dollars and euros
MinorThe narrative uses dollar signs for the 2001 and 2008 heroin prices, while Table 5 labels the same figures as euros.
“the reported average price of 1 gram of heroin decreased from $50.27 in 2001 to $33.25 in 2008”
“TABLE 5 Average price for illicit substances in Portugal in Euros, by year and drugtype, 1998-2008 13”
Conflicting 2001 lifetime drug-use prevalence
MinorThe text gives 7.8 per cent for lifetime illicit drug use among 15-64-year-olds in 2001, while Table 1 gives 7.6 per cent for the same population, measure and year.
“In 2001, only 7.8 per cent of 15-64-year-olds in Portugal had ever used an illicit drug (Balsa et al. 2004).”
“Table: 1 TABLE 1 Prevalence of lifetime illicit drug use in Portugal amongst individuals aged15-64, by drug type, 2001 and 2007 | Drug | 2001 | 2007 | Change | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Any illicit substance | 7.6 | 12.0 | þ4.4 |”
Drug prices have conflicting currency labels
MinorThe text labels the 2001 and 2008 heroin and ecstasy prices as dollars, but Table 5 labels those same numerical prices as euros.
“the reported average price of 1 gram of heroin decreased from $50.27 in 2001 to $33.25 in 2008 and the average price of an ecstasy tablet fell from $6.86 in 2001 to $2.80 in 2008”
“Table: 5 TABLE 5 Average price for illicit substances in Portugal in Euros, by year and drugtype, 1998-2008 13”
Cites
The culture of control: crime and social order in contemporary society
(2002) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.39-3104 · Cited by 3,580 · see citing works
(2007) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.44-7121 · Cited by 1,122 · see citing works
Degenhardt, L., Chiu, W.-T., Sampson, N., Kessler, R. C., Anthony, J. C., Angermeyer, M., Bruffaerts, R., de Girolamo, G., Gureje, O., Huang, Y., et al. (2008) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0050141 · Cited by 796 · see citing works
MacCoun, R. J., & Reuter, P. (2001) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511754272 · Cited by 677 · see citing works
The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society
Hannah‐Moffat, K., & Garland, D. (2002) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/3090074 · Cited by 392 · see citing works
Comparative Criminal Justice: Beyond Ethnocentrism and Relativism
Nelken, D. (2009) · European Journal of Criminology · doi:10.1177/1477370809104684 · Cited by 344 · see citing works
A randomized controlled trial of brief cognitive–behavioral interventions for cannabis use disorder
Copeland, J., Swift, W., Roffman, R., & Stephens, R. (2001) · Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment · doi:10.1016/s0740-5472(01)00179-9 · Cited by 322 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…users is a ‘brief intervention’ involving six sessions of cognitive behavioural therapy, yet this is not currently provided in Portugal (see, e.g. Copeland et al. 2001). by guest on N ovem ber 25, 2010 bjc.oxfordjournals.org D ow nloaded from the issue is a value judgment concerning whether…”
BackgroundBrugal, M. T., Domingo‐Salvany, A., Puig, R., Barrio, G., García de Olalla, P., & De La Fuente, L. (2005) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01089.x · Cited by 228 · see citing works
Drug policy and the public good
Babor, T. F., Caulkins, J. P., Edwards, G., Fischer, B., Foxcroft, D., Humphreys, K. N., Obot, I. S., Rehm, J. T., Reuter, P., Room, R., et al. (2010) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.48-0303 · Cited by 218 · see citing works
Dangers of Dystopias in Penal Theory
Zedner, L. (2002) · Oxford Journal of Legal Studies · doi:10.1093/ojls/22.2.341 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
Drug Policy and the Public Good
Babor, T. F., Caulkins, J. P., Edwards, G., Fischer, B., FOXCROFT, D. R., Humphreys, K. N., Obot, I. S., Rehm, J. T., Reuter, P., Room, R., et al. (2009) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199557127.001.0001 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
Evaluating alternative cannabis regimes
MacCoun, R., & Reuter, P. (2001) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.178.2.123 · Cited by 168 · cited 2× · see citing works
“The most comprehensive synthetic review of the impacts of the decriminalization of illicit drugs has been conducted by MacCoun and Reuter (2001a), using data from the Netherlands, United States, Australia and Italy.”
MethodDrug Decriminalization in Portugal: Lessons for Creating Fair and Successful Drug PoliciesPreprint
Greenwald, G. (2010) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1543991 · Cited by 158 · see citing works
Dutch coffee shops and trends in cannabis use
Korf, D. J. (2002) · Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1016/s0306-4603(02)00291-5 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Countering catastrophic criminology
(2006) · doi:10.1177/1462474506067567 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Marijuana Decriminalization: What does it mean in the United States?
Pacula, R. L., Chriqui, J. F., & King, J. (2003) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w9690 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Williams, J. (2004) · Health Economics · doi:10.1002/hec.796 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
ZHAO, X., & HARRIS, M. N. (2004) · Economic Record · doi:10.1111/j.1475-4932.2004.00197.x · Cited by 98 · see citing works
When two dark figures collide: Evidence and discourse on drug-related crime
Stevens, A. (2007) · Critical Social Policy · doi:10.1177/0261018307072208 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Self-citationStevens, A., & Reuter, P. (2007) · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Self-citationUnited Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (2008) · World drug report · doi:10.18356/7790665d-en · Cited by 67 · see citing works
The effects of partial decriminalisation on cannabis use in South Australia, 1985 to 1993
Donnelly, N., Hall, W., & Christie, P. (1995) · Australian Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1111/j.1753-6405.1995.tb00444.x · Cited by 66 · see citing works
The effects of the decriminalization of drug use in Portugal
(2007) · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Self-citationDrug Decriminalization in Portugal: Lessons for Creating Fair and Successful Drug Policies
Greenwald, G. (2010) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1464837 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
The Origins and Future of the Dutch Approach towards Drugs
(2004) · doi:10.1177/002204260403400303 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Decriminalization and Marijuana Smoking Prevalence: Evidence From Australia
Damrongplasit, K., Hsiao, C., & Zhao, X. (2009) · Journal of Business and Economic Statistics · doi:10.1198/jbes.2009.06129 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Drug Use Criminalization v. Decriminalization: An Analysis in the Light of the Italian Experience
Solivetti, L. M. (2001) · Cited by 26 · see citing works
A Brief History of Cannabis Policies in Spain (1968–2003)
(2004) · doi:10.1177/002204260403400308 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Cannabis in Australia - Use, supply, harms and responses
(2006) · Cited by 10 · see citing works
(2006) · Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Self-citationThe challenge to UK drug policy
McKeganey, N. (2007) · Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy · doi:10.1080/09687630701538766 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Drug War Heresies: Learning From Other Vices, Times, & Places
MacCoun, R. J., & Reuter, P. (2001) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.7249/cb395
(2002) · HRB National Drugs Library (Health Research Board)
The Effect of Marijuana Decriminalization on Hospital Emergency Room Drug Episodes: 1975-1978
Model, K. E. (1993) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2290758
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- 1993, 88, 737
- 2009, REVISTA TOXICODEPENDENCIAS, 15, 19
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Public health and international drug policy
Csete, J., Kamarulzaman, A., Kazatchkine, M. D., Altice, F. L., Balicki, M., Buxton, J., Cepeda, J., Comfort, M. L., Goosby, E., Goulão, J., et al. (2016) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(16)00619-x · Cited by 680 · see citing works
Strang, J., Volkow, N. D., Degenhardt, L., Hickman, M., Johnson, K., Koob, G. F., Marshall, B. D. L., Tyndall, M., & Walsh, S. L. (2020) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/s41572-019-0137-5 · Cited by 639 · see citing works
Wicked Problems in Public Policy
Head, B. W. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-94580-0 · Cited by 360 · see citing works
Heffernan, A., Cooke, G., Nayagam, S., Thursz, M. R., & Hallett, T. B. (2019) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(18)32277-3 · Cited by 265 · see citing works
Iversen, L. L. (2007) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195328240.001.0001 · Cited by 230 · see citing works
Racial Justice Requires Ending the War on Drugs
Earp, B. D., Lewis, J., Hart, C. L., & Reform, W. B. A. A. P. F. D. P. (2021) · The American Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.1080/15265161.2020.1861364 · Cited by 168 · see citing works
Crime and the Depenalization of Cannabis Possession: Evidence from a Policing Experiment
Adda, J., McConnell, B., & Imran Rasul, A. (2014) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/676932 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
The Future of Fentanyl and Other Synthetic Opioids
Pardo, B., Taylor, J., Caulkins, J. P., Kilmer, B., Reuter, P. H., & Stein, B. D. (2019) · RAND Corporation eBooks · doi:10.7249/rr3117 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Stevens, A., Hughes, C., Hulme, S., & Cassidy, R. M. (2019) · European Journal of Criminology · doi:10.1177/1477370819887514 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Self-citationPalamar, J. J., Ompad, D. C., & Petkova, E. (2014) · International Journal of Drug Policy · doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2014.01.017 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Hartogsohn, I. (2020) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/11888.001.0001 · Cited by 158 · see citing works
Fergusson, D. M., Boden, J. M., & Horwood, L. J. (2015) · Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology · doi:10.1007/s00127-015-1070-x · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Hughes, C., & Stevens, A. (2012) · Drug and Alcohol Review · doi:10.1111/j.1465-3362.2011.00383.x · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Self-citationCaulkins, J. P., Kilmer, B., MacCoun, R. J., Pacula, R. L., & Reuter, P. (2011) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03561.x · Cited by 105 · see citing works
20 years of Portuguese drug policy - developments, challenges and the quest for human rights
Rêgo, X., Oliveira, M. J., Lameira, C., & Cruz, O. S. (2021) · Substance Abuse Treatment Prevention and Policy · doi:10.1186/s13011-021-00394-7 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Race, K., Lea, T., Murphy, D., & Pienaar, K. (2016) · Sexual Health · doi:10.1071/sh16080 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Taylor, S., Buchanan, J., & Ayres, T. C. (2016) · Criminology & Criminal Justice · doi:10.1177/1748895816633274 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Freudenberg, N., & Heller, D. I. (2016) · Annual Review of Public Health · doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032315-021420 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Cannabis decriminalization: A study of recent policy change in five U.S. states
Grucza, R. A., Vuolo, M., Krauss, M. J., Plunk, A. D., Arpana Agrawal, A., Chaloupka, F. J., & Bierut, L. J. (2018) · International Journal of Drug Policy · doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.06.016 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Uses and Abuses of Drug Decriminalization in Portugal
Laqueur, H. S. (2014) · Law & Social Inquiry · doi:10.1111/lsi.12104 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
International drug control: consensus fractured
(2013) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.50-5257 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Public Health and Prisons: Priorities in the Age of Mass Incarceration
Cloud, D. H., Garcia-Grossman, I. R., Armstrong, A., & Williams, B. A. (2022) · Annual Review of Public Health · doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-071521-034016 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
The value of harm reduction for injection drug use: A clinical and public health ethics analysis
Vearrier, L. E. (2018) · Disease-a-Month · doi:10.1016/j.disamonth.2018.12.002 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
A social cost perspective in the wake of the Portuguese strategy for the fight against drugs
Gonçalves, R., Lourenço, A., & da Silva, S. N. (2014) · International Journal of Drug Policy · doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2014.08.017 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Assessing Drug Prohibition and Its Alternatives: A Guide for Agnostics
MacCoun, R. J., & Reuter, P. (2011) · Annual Review of Law and Social Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-102510-105442 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Blais, É., Brisson, J., Gagnon, F. M., & Lemay, S.-A. (2022) · International Journal of Drug Policy · doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2022.103697 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Caulkins, J. P., Kilmer, B., & R.Kleiman, M. A. (2016) · doi:10.1093/wentk/9780190262419.001.0001 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Scheim, A. I., Maghsoudi, N., Marshall, Z., Churchill, S., Ziegler, C., & Werb, D. (2020) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035148 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Drug decriminalization and the price of illicit drugs
Félix, S., & Portugal, P. (2016) · International Journal of Drug Policy · doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2016.10.014 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Høj, S. B., Jacka, B. P., Minoyan, N., Artenie, A. A., & Bruneau, J. (2019) · International Journal of Drug Policy · doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.04.001 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Park, H., McGill, S. L., Arnold, A. D., & Carlson, R. P. (2019) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00018-019-03377-x · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Greer, A., Bonn, M., Shane, C., Stevens, A., Tousenard, N., & Ritter, A. J. (2022) · International Journal of Drug Policy · doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2022.103605 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Self-citationA Syndemic Model of Exchange Sex Among HIV-Positive Men Who Have Sex With Men
Walters, S. M., Braksmajer, A., Coston, B. M., Yoon, I. S., Grov, C., Downing, M. J., Teran, R. A., & Hirshfield, S. (2020) · Archives of Sexual Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10508-020-01628-8 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Smiley-McDonald, H. M., Attaway, P. R., Wenger, L. D., Greenwell, K., Lambdin, B. H., & Kral, A. H. (2023) · International Journal of Drug Policy · doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2023.104100 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Cannabis Control and Crime: Medicinal Use, Depenalization and the War on Drugs
Huber, A., Newman, R., & LaFave, D. (2016) · The B E Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy · doi:10.1515/bejeap-2015-0167 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Cannabis legalization: adhering to public health best practice
Spithoff, S. M., Emerson, B., & Spithoff, A. (2015) · Canadian Medical Association Journal · doi:10.1503/cmaj.150657 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
‘Worth the test?’ Pragmatism, pill testing and drug policy in Australia
Groves, A. (2018) · Harm Reduction Journal · doi:10.1186/s12954-018-0216-z · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Běláčková, V., Ritter, A. J., Shanahan, M., & Hughes, C. (2017) · International Journal of Drug Policy · doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2016.12.013 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Self-citationExperiences with Policing among People Who Inject Drugs in Bangkok, Thailand: A Qualitative Study
Hayashi, K., Small, W., Csete, J., Hattirat, S., & Kerr, T. H. (2013) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001570 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Cannabis decriminalization and racial disparity in arrests for cannabis possession
Gunadi, C., & Shi, Y. (2021) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114672 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Policing cannabis and drug related hospital admissions: Evidence from administrative records
Kelly, E. A., & Imran Rasul, A. (2014) · Journal of Public Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2014.01.008 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Comparative policy analysis for alcohol and drugs: Current state of the field
Ritter, A. J., Livingston, M., Chalmers, J., Berends, L., & Reuter, P. (2016) · International Journal of Drug Policy · doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2016.02.004 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
What Can Be Learned from Cross-National Comparisons of Data on Illegal Drugs?
Kilmer, B., Reuter, P., & Giommoni, L. (2015) · Crime and Justice · doi:10.1086/681552 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Do legal origins affect cross-country incarceration rates?
D’Amico, D. J., & Williamson, C. R. (2014) · Journal of Comparative Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jce.2014.11.002 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Addressing health inequities through social inclusion: The role of community organizations
Belle‐Isle, L., Benoit, C., & Pauly, B. (2014) · Action Research · doi:10.1177/1476750314527324 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
PTSD and opioid use: implications for intervention and policy
Dahlby, L., & Kerr, T. H. (2020) · Substance Abuse Treatment Prevention and Policy · doi:10.1186/s13011-020-00264-8 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Critical realism and the ‘ontological politics of drug policy’
Stevens, A. (2020) · International Journal of Drug Policy · doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.102723 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Self-citationMoallef, S., Nosova, E., Milloy, M., DeBeck, K., Fairbairn, N. S., Wood, E., Kerr, T. H., & Hayashi, K. (2019) · Public Health Reports · doi:10.1177/0033354919857084 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Harm Reduction or Psychedelic Support? Caring for Drug-Related Crises at Transformational Festivals
Ruane, D. (2015) · Dancecult · doi:10.12801/1947-5403.2015.07.01.03 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Ladegaard, I. (2017) · Critical Sociology · doi:10.1177/0896920517735670 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Douglass, C. H., Win, T. M., Goutzamanis, S., Lim, M. S. C., Block, K., Onsando, G., Hellard, M. E., Higgs, P., Livingstone, C. H., & Horyniak, D. (2023) · Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health · doi:10.1007/s10903-023-01468-3 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Per se drugged driving laws and traffic fatalities
Anderson, D. M., & Rees, D. I. (2015) · International Review of Law and Economics · doi:10.1016/j.irle.2015.02.004 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
A critique of cannabis legalization proposals in Canada
Kalant, H. (2016) · International Journal of Drug Policy · doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2016.05.002 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Matthews, S. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-02580-9_2 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
The abject failure of drug prohibition
WODAK, A. D. (2014) · Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology · doi:10.1177/0004865814524424 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Experiences with the Philadelphia police assisted diversion program: A qualitative study
Anderson, E. D., Shefner, R. T., Koppel, R., Megerian, C. E., & Frasso, R. (2021) · International Journal of Drug Policy · doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2021.103521 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Institutional anomie and cross‐national differences in incarceration †
Weiss, D. B., Testa, A., & Santos, M. R. (2020) · doi:10.1111/1745-9125.12242 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Birds of a Feather: Applied Behavior Analysis and Quality of Life
Gambrill, E. D. (2012) · Research on Social Work Practice · doi:10.1177/1049731512465775 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Cannabis policy and the uptake of treatment for cannabis‐related problems
Adam, C., & Raschzok, A. (2017) · Drug and Alcohol Review · doi:10.1111/dar.12401 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Contextualizing Canada’s hepatitis C virus epidemic
Krajden, M., Cook, D. A., & Janjua, N. Z. (2018) · Canadian Liver Journal · doi:10.3138/canlivj.2018-0011 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Fischer, B., Rehm, J., & Crépault, J.-F. (2016) · The International journal on drug policy · doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2016.06.014 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Doping, sport and the law: time for repeal of prohibition?
Anderson, J. (2013) · International Journal of Law in Context · doi:10.1017/s1744552313000050 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Improving community health and safety in Canada through evidence-based policies on illegal drugs.
Wood, E., McKinnon, M., Strang, R., & Kendall, P. (2012) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · Cited by 20 · see citing works
A Legacy of Harm: Punitive Drug Policies and Women’s Carceral Experiences in Canada
van der Meulen, E., Shalit, A. D., & Chu, S. K. H. (2017) · Women & Criminal Justice · doi:10.1080/08974454.2017.1307160 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Going after the Addiction, Not the Addicted: The Impact of Drug Decriminalization in Portugal
Félix, S., Portugal, P., & Tavares, A. S. (2017) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3010673 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Alternatives to sharing COVID-19 data with law enforcement: Recommendations for stakeholders
Molldrem, S., Hussain, M., & McClelland, A. (2020) · Health Policy · doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.10.015 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Curtis, M., Winter, R., Dietze, P., Wilkinson, A. L., Cossar, R. D., Stewart, A. C., Agius, P. A., Butler, T. G., Aitken, C. K., Kirwan, A., et al. (2022) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/add.15971 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Morales, M., Rafful, C. M., Baker, P. A., Arredondo, J., Kang, S., Mittal, M. L., Rocha‐Jiménez, T., Strathdee, S. A., & Beletsky, L. A. (2020) · Health & Justice · doi:10.1186/s40352-020-00111-9 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
The decriminalization of illicit drugs in British Columbia: a national evaluation protocol.
Russell, C., Ali, F., Imtiaz, S., Butler, A., Greer, A., Rehm, J., the Decriminalization Evaluation Research Group, Bardwell, G., Bonn, M., Boyd, J., et al. (2024) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-024-20336-9 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Retreat or Entrenchment? Drug Policies in the Nordic Countries at a Crossroads
Tham, H. A. S. (2021) · doi:10.16993/bbo · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Keep Off the Grass: The Economics of Prohibition and U.S. Drug Policy
Boettke, P. J., Coyne, C. J., & Hall, A. R. (2013) · Scholars' Bank (University of Oregon) · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Drug-related police encounters across the globe: How do they compare?
Hughes, C., Barratt, M. J., Ferris, J., Maier, L. J., & WINSTOCK, A. R. (2018) · International Journal of Drug Policy · doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.03.005 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Self-citationMånsson, J., & Ekendahl, M. (2015) · Contemporary Drug Problems · doi:10.1177/0091450915599348 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Immigration trials and international crimes: Expressing justice and performing race
Palmer, N. (2021) · Theoretical Criminology · doi:10.1177/13624806211009157 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Cannabis legalization: progress in harm reduction approaches for substance use and misuse
Adinoff, B. H., & Cooper, Z. D. (2019) · The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse · doi:10.1080/00952990.2019.1680683 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Punitive Drug Law and the Risk Environment for Injecting Drug Users: Understanding the ConnectionsPreprint
Chiu, J. V., & Burris, S. C. (2012) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2102841 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Alternate policing strategies: Cost-effectiveness of cautioning for cannabis offences
Shanahan, M., Hughes, C., McSweeney, T., & Griffin, B. A. (2017) · International Journal of Drug Policy · doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2016.12.012 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Self-citationCannabis criminology: inequality, coercion, and illusions of reform
Wheeldon, J., & Heidt, J. (2022) · Drugs Education Prevention and Policy · doi:10.1080/09687637.2022.2081531 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Leonard, J., & Windle, J. (2020) · International Journal of Drug Policy · doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.102891 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Drogen, Drogenkonsum und Drogenabhängigkeit
Groenemeyer, A. (2012) · VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-531-94160-8_8 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Pereira, M., & Fialho, R. (2016) · Journal of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s10865-016-9778-y · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Supriyanto, A., Hendiani, N., Hartini, S. H. A., & Sabri, F. (2021) · Counsellia Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling · doi:10.25273/counsellia.v11i1.8585 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Davenport, T. E., DeVoght, A., Sisneros, H., & Bezruchka, S. (2020) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.1093/ptj/pzaa031 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Argento, E., Shannon, K., Fairbairn, N. S., Moreheart, S., Braschel, M. C., & Goldenberg, S. M. (2023) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2023.109789 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hughes, C. E., & Stevens, A.
- Affiliations
- UNSW Sydney (AU)
- University of Kent (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Hughes, C. E.
- Venue
- British Journal of Criminology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2010-07-21
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 999-1022
- ISSN
- 0007-0955 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-3529
- OpenAlex
- W2148618983
- Cited by
- 440
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 33 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 56 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 51 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 18
- FWCI
- 44.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- The British Journal of Criminology (publishedVersion)
- Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Beckley Foundation
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Law and Policy
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Keywords
- drug decriminalization, Portugal, drug policy, drug use trends, drug-related harm, drug law, harm reduction, Spain, Italy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-09-28.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-09-28.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review