Cited by 48

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

South Coast Missing Linkages: restoring connectivity to wildlands in the largest metropolitan area in the USA

Beier, Paul, Penrod, Kristeen L., Luke, Claudia, Spencer, Wayne D., Cabañero, Clint·2006·Connectivity Conservation

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/cbo9780511754821.025

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some current methods of mapping functional connectivity require the identification of one or a few focal species.

    “A second concern is that some current methods of mapping functional connectivity require the identification of one or a few focal species (Beier et al. 2006;Cushman & Landguth 2012), and estimates of connectivity may be sensitive to this choice of species (Beier, Majka & Newell 2009;Cushman, Landguth & Flather 2013).”

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. 10.1890/1051-0761(2001)011[0961:CAFSFC]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  2. 10.1577/1548-8659(2002)131<0865:FAAEVA>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  3. Quinby, 1999, Opportunities for Wildlife Habitat Connectivity between Algonquin Provincial Park and the Adirondack Park
  4. 10.1023/A:1024069014911 · DOI
  5. 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.00328.x · DOI
  6. 10.1016/S0006-3207(01)00039-8 · DOI
  7. Goforth, 2000, Local and landscape-scale relations between stream communities, stream habitat and terrestrial land cover properties, Dissertation Abstracts International Part B: Science and Engineering, 8, 3682
  8. 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.00386.x · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1007/s0026702409 · DOI
  10. Penrod, 2001, Missing Linkages: Restoring Connectivity to the California Landscape
  11. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2006.02907.x · DOI
  12. Hunter, 1999, South Coast Regional Report: California Wildlands Project Vision for Wild California
  13. 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.02069.x · DOI
  14. 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1993.07010094.x · DOI · Paper page
  15. Barrowclough, 1978, Sampling bias in dispersal studies based on finite area, Journal of Field Ornithology, 4, 333
  16. 10.2307/1935620 · DOI
  17. 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00804.x · DOI
  18. 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.01405.x · DOI
  19. Soulé, 1999, Continental Conservation
  20. 10.1016/S0269-7491(02)00281-6 · DOI
  21. 10.1007/BF00055941 · DOI
  22. Beier, 1992, A checklist for evaluating impacts to wildlife movement corridors, Wildlife Society Bulletin, 20, 434
  23. 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1992.620293.x · DOI
  24. Scott, 2002, Integrating the stream and its valley: land use change, aquatic habitat, and fish assemblages (North Carolina), Dissertation Abstracts International Part B: Science and Engineering, 63, 51
  25. 10.1016/S0006-3207(03)00159-9 · DOI
  26. 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2001.tb03654.x · DOI
  27. 10.2307/1382852 · DOI
  28. 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1998.98036.x · DOI
  29. Polak, 2001, Natural Community Conservation Planning (NCCP): The Origins of an Ambitious Experiment to Protect Ecosystems
  30. 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.01458.x · DOI
  31. 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.01082.x · DOI
  32. 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1992.06040493.x · DOI
  33. 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2001.tb03655.x · DOI
  34. 10.1016/S0006-3207(02)00397-X · DOI
  35. 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1997.96319.x · DOI
  36. California Department of Fish and Game, 2002, CWHR v 8.0 Personal Computer Program
  37. Miller, 1999, Using focal species in the design of nature reserve networks, Wild Earth, 8, 81

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Beier, P., Penrod, K. L., Luke, C., Spencer, W. D., & Cabañero, C.
Venue
Connectivity Conservation
Published
2006-11-02
Pages
555-586
Cited by
48
References
0

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review