Cited by 293Wildlife-Road Interactions and ConservationWildlife Ecology and ConservationSpecies Distribution and Climate Change

Landscape connectivity for wildlife: development and validation of multispecies linkage maps

Open access
Koen, Erin L., Bowman, Jeff, Sadowski, Carrie, Walpole, Aaron A.·2014·Methods in Ecology and Evolution

Abstract

The ability to identify regions of high functional connectivity for multiple wildlife species is of conservation interest with respect to habitat management and corridor planning. We present a method that does not require independent, field-collected data, is insensitive to the placement of source and destination sites (nodes) for modeling connectivity, and does not require the selection of a focal species. In the first step of our approach, we created a cost surface that represented permeability of the landscape to movement for a suite of species. We randomly selected nodes around the perimeter of the buffered study area and used circuit theory to connect pairs of nodes. When the buffer was removed, the resulting current density map represented, for each grid cell, the probability of use by moving animals. We found that using nodes that were randomly located around the perimeter of the buffered study area was less biased by node placement than randomly selecting nodes within the study area. We also found that a buffer of ≥ 20% of the study area width was sufficient to remove the effects of node placement on current density. We tested our method by creating a map of connectivity in the Algonquin to Adirondack region in eastern North America, and we validated the map with independently collected data. We found that amphibians and reptiles were more likely to cross roads in areas of high current density, and fishers (Pekania [Martes] pennanti) used areas with high current density within their home ranges. Our approach provides an efficient and cost effective method of predicting areas with relatively high landscape connectivity for multiple species..

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/2041-210x.12197

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Carroll C., 2013, Connectivity Analysis Toolkit Manual, version 1.3

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Koen, E. L., Bowman, J., Sadowski, C., & Walpole, A. A.
Affiliations
  • Trent University (CA)
  • Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry (CA)
Corresponding author
Koen, Erin L.
Venue
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-05-10
Volume
5
Issue
7
Pages
626-633
ISSN
2041-210X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1980344423
Cited by
293
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 1
FWCI
9.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Methods in Ecology and Evolution (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ministry of Natural Resources
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecological Modeling › Species Distribution and Climate Change
Keywords
landscape connectivity, circuit theory, current density, cost surface, habitat permeability, ecological corridors, amphibians and reptiles, road crossing, fishermen, Pekania pennanti, habitat management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review