The DOI matches its Crossref record; 92 of the 92 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The 2000 Presidential Election and the Foundations of Party Politics
Abstract
In the aftermath of the 2000 presidential election, campaigns suddenly seem to matter, as do questions about the electoral process. Professors Johnston, Hagen and Jamieson have examined the US electoral process as an integrated event spanning a full year, drawing upon a data set that is massive in scale and novel in execution: the Annenberg 2000 Election Study. The scale of their fieldwork is such that they have been able to isolate key turning points and that dynamics can be studied within certain segments. The interviews are rich in opinion about policy, perception, information and judgement about candidates, media use and strategy. What is more, the authors have used candidate appearances, news coverage, and campaign advertising to provide the first integrated account of this or any US campaign.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community
(2000) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.38-2454 · Cited by 28,789
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Festinger, L. (1957) · doi:10.1515/9781503620766 · Cited by 24,241
An Economic Theory of Democracy.
Banfield, E. C., & Downs, A. (1958) · Midwest Journal of Political Science · doi:10.2307/2109186 · Cited by 18,594
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
(2017) · Macat Library eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781912282432 · Cited by 18,122
Putnam, R. (2000) · doi:10.1145/358916.361990 · Cited by 17,114
The Agenda-Setting Function of Mass Media
McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1086/267990 · Cited by 9,537
The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion
Zaller, J. R. (1992) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511818691 · Cited by 7,785
Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies
Inglehart, R. (1997) · doi:10.1515/9780691214429 · Cited by 5,392
Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies
Fukuyama, F., & Inglehart, R. (1997) · Foreign Affairs · doi:10.2307/20048045 · Cited by 4,803
“Effective” Number of Parties: A Measure with Application to West Europe
Laakso, M., & Taagepera, R. (1979) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/001041407901200101 · Cited by 3,439
Cited by
A New Era of Minimal Effects? The Changing Foundations of Political Communication
Bennett, W. L., & Iyengar, S. (2008) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00410.x · Cited by 1,558
GERBER, A. S., GIMPEL, J. G., GREEN, D. P., & SHAW, D. R. (2011) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s000305541000047x · Cited by 596
Party identification: Unmoved mover or sum of preferences?
Johnston, R. (2006) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.9.062404.170523 · Cited by 246
Self-citationHow Quickly We Forget: The Duration of Persuasion Effects From Mass Communication
Hill, S. J., Lo, J., Vavreck, L., & Zaller, J. (2013) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584609.2013.828143 · Cited by 238
Coppock, A., Hill, S. J., & Vavreck, L. (2020) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abc4046 · Cited by 171
Metadata
- Authors
- Johnston, R., Hagen, M. G., & Jamieson, K. H.
- Venue
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2004-06-28
- OpenAlex
- W1600566067
- Cited by
- 272
- References
- 92
- FWCI
- 13.04
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The 2000 Presidential Election and the Foundations of Party Politics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/cbo9780511756207
- The paper
- Johnston, R., Hagen, M. G., & Jamieson, K. H. (2004). The 2000 Presidential Election and the Foundations of Party Politics. Cambridge University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511756207
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
