The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
“Effective” Number of Parties: A Measure with Application to West Europe
Open accessAbstract
The qEffectiveq Number of Parties: qA Measure with Application to West Europeq Laakso, Markku;Taagepera, Rein Comparative Political Studies; Apr 1, 1979; 12, 1; Proouest pg. 3 “EFFECTIVE” NUMBER OF PARTIES A Measure with Application to West Europe MARKKU LAAKSO University of Helsinki REIN TAAGEPERA University of California, Irvine I s a large number of parties bound to destabilize a political system (Duverger, 1954) or is it not (e.g., Lijphart, 1968; Nilson, 1974)? Before this question can be answered, the number of parties must be operationally defined in a way that takes into account their relative size. Such a number is also needed if one wants to detect trends toward fewer or more numerous parties over time, or the effects of a proposed change in electoral rules. This article presents ways to calculate this important political variable, calculates it for I42 post-1944 elections in 15 West European countries, and analyzes its possible effect on stability. We often talk of two-party and multiparty systems. We further dis- tinguish three~ or four—party systems in some countries, and even talk (e. g., Blondel, 1969: 535) of a two-and-a-half-party system whenthere is a third party of marginal size. Mexico could be viewed as a one-and-a- half-party system because the PR1 is so much larger than all other parties. Rather than take the number of all existing parties, including even the very smallest, one visibly has a need for a number that takes into account their relative size. We will call this number the “effective number of parties,” using the word “effectiveq somewhat in the sense pressure group literature uses it when talking about “effective access” (Truman, 195]: 506), but even more in the operational sense physicists give it when they talk about effective current (Richards et al., 1960: 594), COMPARATIVE POLITICAL STUDIES. Vol. I2 No. I. April 1979 3-27 © I979 Sage Publications. Inc. Copyright (c) 2000 Bell & Howell Information and Learning Company Copyright (c) Sage Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Messiah, A. (1961) · Cited by 16,012
A Method for Evaluating the Distribution of Power in a Committee System
Shapley, L. S., & Shubik, M. (1954) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/1951053 · Cited by 2,162
Economics and Information Theory
Sastry, M. V. R., & Theil, H. (1969) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1912805 · Cited by 2,117
The Political Consequences of Electoral Laws
Groennings, S., & Rae, D. W. (1968) · The Western Political Quarterly · doi:10.2307/446528 · Cited by 1,766
Making votes count: strategic coordination in the world's electoral systems
(1998) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.35-2982 · Cited by 1,753
Seats and votes. The effects and determinants of electoral systems
Berg, S. (1990) · European Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1016/0176-2680(90)90044-j · Cited by 1,627
HARLEY, J. B. (1989) · Cartographica · doi:10.3138/e635-7827-1757-9t53 · Cited by 1,366
Electoral systems and party systems: a study of twenty-seven democracies, 1945-1990
(1994) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.32-1188 · Cited by 1,126
World Handbook of Political and Social Indicators
(1965) · International Affairs · doi:10.1093/ia/41.2.316a · Cited by 1,048
Electoral authoritarianism: the dynamics of unfree competition
(2006) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.44-2347 · Cited by 819
Cited by
Cultural Backlash: Trump, Brexit, and Authoritarian Populism
Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2019) · doi:10.1017/9781108595841 · Cited by 2,986
Presidentialism, Multipartism, and Democracy: The Difficult Combination
MAINWARING, S. (1993) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0010414093026002003 · Cited by 950
Explaining voter turnout: A review of aggregate-level research
Geys, B. (2006) · Electoral Studies · doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2005.09.002 · Cited by 860
Economic voting and political context: a comparative perspective
Anderson, C. J. (2000) · Electoral Studies · doi:10.1016/s0261-3794(99)00045-1 · Cited by 722
Dalton, R. J. (2008) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0010414008315860 · Cited by 742
Metadata
- Authors
- Laakso, M., & Taagepera, R.
- Venue
- Comparative Political Studies
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1979-04
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3-27
- ISSN
- 0010-4140 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3829
- OpenAlex
- W1925504877
- Cited by
- 3,439
- References
- 35
- FWCI
- 34.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: “Effective” Number of Parties: A Measure with Application to West Europe. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/001041407901200101
- The paper
- Laakso, M., & Taagepera, R. (1979). “Effective” Number of Parties: A Measure with Application to West Europe. Comparative Political Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/001041407901200101
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.