The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Why did oxygen supplant phlogiston? Research programmes in the Chemical Revolution
Abstract
Imre Lakatos showed how different philosophies of science provide different analytical tools with which to approach the history of science. And he showed how different philosophies of science could be evaluated by seeing how well they account for episodes in the history of science. In this paper I shall reconsider a very famous episode in the history of science, the Chemical Revolution, and argue that Lakatos's methodology of scientific research programmes provides the best account of it. I will first outline the accounts of the Chemical Revolution given by other methodologies, and show that they are unsatisfactory: each of them must either deem the Chemical Revolution an irrational affair or falsify history so that it squares with its canons of rationality. Then I will argue that the actual story of the Chemical Revolution fits Lakatos's methodology like a glove. We all know that it is easy to find ‘confirmations’ of a scientific theory if you look for them. Similarly, it is easy to find ‘confirmations’ of a methodology if you look for them in the history of science. So perhaps it is worth mentioning that I first become interested in the Chemical Revolution in order to try to refute Lakatos's methodology. The conclusions I have reached about the Chemical Revolution do not square with the preconceptions I had at the outset. And while I have been, and still am, critical of some features of Lakatos's methodology, they are not features which need concern us here.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“After more than a decade of active experimentation, major phlogiston theorists switched one by one to become proponents of Lavoisier's oxygen theory (Musgrave, 1976).”
From The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: A theoretical framework and implications for science instruction. (1993) · cites this paper as Musgrave, 1976
In the citing paper
“In the history of science, unambiguous data against a theory sometimes nudge scientists toward eventual theory change (cf.Badash, 1966;Musgrave, 1976), but unambiguous data often produce abeyance or peripheral change instead.”
From The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: A theoretical framework and implications for science instruction. (1993) · cites this paper as Musgrave, 1976
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Chinn, C. A., & Brewer, W. F. (1993) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543063001001 · Cited by 1,393
“After more than a decade of active experimentation, major phlogiston theorists switched one by one to become proponents of Lavoisier's oxygen theory (Musgrave, 1976).”
BackgroundInventing Temperature: Measurement and Scientific Progress
Chang, H. (2004) · doi:10.1093/0195171276.001.0001 · Cited by 883
Marketing, Scientific Progress, and Scientific Method
Anderson, P. F. (1983) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224298304700403 · Cited by 405
Towards a lakatosian analysis of the piagetian and alternative conceptions research programs
Gilbert, J. K., & Swift, D. J. (1985) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.3730690510 · Cited by 127
Ladyman, J. (2009) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-009-9607-8 · Cited by 107
“…metals from calxs, hence phlogiston was supposed to have a metallic quality and to explain what all metals have in common (being shiny, malleable and so on) despite their calces lacking 3 As Musgrave (1976) points out this is a classic case of the Duhem problem of localizing falsification.”
BackgroundWe Have Never Been Whiggish (About Phlogiston)1
Chang, H. (2009) · Centaurus · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0498.2009.00150.x · Cited by 91
A Theory of Historical Discovery: The Construction of Componential Models
Żytkow, J. M., & Simon, H. A. (1986) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1022695221716 · Cited by 71
Beyond Case-Studies: History as Philosophy
Chang, H. (2011) · Boston studies in the philosophy of science · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-1745-9_8 · Cited by 68
A theory of historical discovery: The construction of componential models
Żytkow, J. M., & Simon, H. A. (1986) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00116252 · Cited by 64
Musgrave, A. E. (1976) · Boston studies in the philosophy of science · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-1451-9_27 · Cited by 59
Self-citationNature of Science in General Chemistry Textbooks
Níaz, M., & Maza, A. (2011) · Springer briefs in education · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-1920-0 · Cited by 57
Identifying Future-Proof Science
Vickers, P. (2022) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192862730.001.0001 · Cited by 57
Scientific pluralism and the Chemical Revolution
Kusch, M. (2014) · Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A · doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2014.10.001 · Cited by 40
Scientific Progress: Beyond Foundationalism and Coherentism
Chang, H. (2007) · Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement · doi:10.1017/s1358246100009723 · Cited by 40
The Hidden History of Phlogiston How Philosophical Failure Can Generate Historiographical Refinement
Chang, H. (2010) · Hyle · Cited by 39
Thomas Kuhn and Science Education
Matthews, M. R. (2022) · Science & Education · doi:10.1007/s11191-022-00408-1 · Cited by 48
Empirical Economic Model Discovery and Theory Evaluation
Hendry, D. F. (2011) · Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford) · doi:10.22029/jlupub-375 · Cited by 33
Best theory scientific realism
Doppelt, G. (2014) · European Journal for Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1007/s13194-014-0090-9 · Cited by 32
Brewer, W. F., & Chinn, C. A. (1994) · PSA Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association · doi:10.1086/psaprocbienmeetp.1994.1.193035 · Cited by 27
The development of problems within the phlogiston theories, 1766–1791
Blumenthal, G., & Ladyman, J. (2017) · Foundations of Chemistry · doi:10.1007/s10698-017-9289-0 · Cited by 21
“47 There are many authors who have not recognised the problems of the proposed equivalence of phlogiston and negative oxygen, including Rodwell (1868, p. 25), Musgrave (1976), Holmes (1995, p. 19), McEvoy (1997, p. 22) and Klein and Lefèvre (2007).”
BackgroundInfluentialNature of Science in General Chemistry Textbooks
Níaz, M., & Maza, A. (2011) · Springer briefs in education · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-1920-0_1 · Cited by 21
Más allá del positivismo: una interpretación lakatosiana de la enseñanza de las ciencias
Níaz, M. (1994) · Enseñanza de las Ciencias Revista de investigación y experiencias didácticas · doi:10.5565/rev/ensciencias.4490 · Cited by 20
Schummer, J. (1997) · Journal for General Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1023/a:1008206719087 · Cited by 20
From Standard Scientific Realism and Structural Realism to Best Current Theory Realism
Doppelt, G. (2011) · Journal for General Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1007/s10838-011-9167-8 · Cited by 19
Dunleavy, D. J. (2022) · European Journal for Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1007/s13194-022-00492-8 · Cited by 20
“…highly mature theoretical content (e.g., Newton’s theory of gravitation; Bohr’s model of the atom, Copernicus’ heliocentric model of the universe; Lakatos & Zahar, 1975; Musgrave, 1976b; Zahar, 1973a, 1973b) – there is no clear rationale for precluding its use in describing other areas of inquiry.”
BackgroundInfluentialVickers, P. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192862730.003.0001 · Cited by 14
Pluralism in Historiography: A Case Study of Case Studies
Kinzel, K. (2016) · Boston studies in the philosophy of science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-30229-4_7 · Cited by 14
In Search of the Chemical Revolution: Interpretive Strategies in the History of Chemistry
McEvoy, J. G. (2000) · Foundations of Chemistry · doi:10.1023/a:1009968823008 · Cited by 13
Controversy in Chemistry: How Do You Prove a Negative?—The Cases of Phlogiston and Cold Fusion
Labinger, J. A., & Weininger, S. J. (2005) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.200462084 · Cited by 12
The ‘Instrumental’ Reality of Phlogiston
Kim, M. G., & Publications, H. (2008) · HYLE · doi:10.5840/hyle20081412 · Cited by 12
“Only a ‘superior’ research program could overthrow the existing program and initiate a revolution in science (Musgrave 1976).”
BackgroundTheory Choice and Resistance to Change
Lugg, A. M. (1980) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1086/288930 · Cited by 11
Explaining the Success of Science: Kuhn and Scientific Realists
Doppelt, G. (2012) · Topoi · doi:10.1007/s11245-012-9135-x · Cited by 10
Discovery, theory change and structural realism
McArthur, D. (2009) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-009-9672-z · Cited by 8
“Kuhn (1977) and Musgrave (1976), for example, have both rejected the idea that discovery can be attributed to any particular instance, such as isolating a first laboratory sample.”
BackgroundSearching for the Holy in the Ascent of Imre Lakatos
WETTERSTEN, J. R. (2004) · Philosophy of the Social Sciences · doi:10.1177/0048393103261235 · Cited by 7
A Story of a Science: On the Evolution of Chemistry
Vihalemm, R. (2019) · Acta Baltica Historiae et Philosophiae Scientiarum · doi:10.11590/abhps.2019.2.01 · Cited by 7
From phlogiston to caloric: chemical ontologies
Kim, M. G. (2011) · Foundations of Chemistry · doi:10.1007/s10698-011-9116-y · Cited by 6
Stabilizing Chemical Reality: The Analytic-Synthetic Ideal of Chemical Species
Kim, M. G., & Publications, H. (2014) · HYLE · doi:10.5840/hyle20142016 · Cited by 6
“Although historians and philosophers have studied Lavoisier’s extraordinary journey in detail (Guerlac 1961, Holmes 1998, Musgrave 1976, Thagard 1990, Pyle 2000), they do not yet appreciate how difficult it was to create the genus of gases and why it necessitated the elimination of phlogiston and a…”
Experimental realism defended: how inference to the most likely cause might be sound
Suárez, M. (2006) · London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) · Cited by 5
The Sodium Pump and Its Rivals: An Example of Conflict Resolution in Science
Robinson, J. D. (1982) · Perspectives in biology and medicine · doi:10.1353/pbm.1982.0027 · Cited by 5
Joseph Priestley's American Defense of Phlogiston Reconsidered
Conlin, M. F. (1996) · Ambix · doi:10.1179/amb.1996.43.3.129 · Cited by 4
The Mathematical Present as History
(2001) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctv1220pnn.6 · Cited by 4
Dunleavy, D. J. (2022) · doi:10.31222/osf.io/yskhj · Cited by 4
On Lavoisier's Achievement in Chemistry
Blumenthal, G. (2012) · Centaurus · doi:10.1111/1600-0498.12001 · Cited by 3
“Concerning previous philosophical views on the subject, as noted by Musgrave (1976), Lavoisier’s theory was not established by induction, nor did theory change follow some form of ‘sufficient justification’; in line with Duhem’s thesis, anomalies with each theory could be rationally ignored on the…”
BackgroundTheory, Measurement, and Absolute Temperature
Chang, H. (2004) · doi:10.1093/0195171276.003.0004 · Cited by 2
Duerr, P. M., & Mills, A. H. (2025) · Journal for General Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1007/s10838-025-09722-y · Cited by 2
Scientific Discovery: That-Whats and What-Thats
Schindler, S. (2015) · Ergo an Open Access Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.3998/ergo.12405314.0002.006 · Cited by 2
Kontroversen in der Chemie: Wie beweist man ein Negativum? – Die Fälle Phlogiston und Kalte Fusion
Labinger, J. A., & Weininger, S. J. (2005) · Angewandte Chemie · doi:10.1002/ange.200462084 · Cited by 2
How to be a scientific realist (if at all): a study of partial realism
Peters, D. (2012) · UPT. Syiah Kuala University Library (Syiah Kuala University) · Cited by 2
Redox‐Prozesse — zur Entwicklung des Verständnisses von Schülern im Laufe der Schulzeit
Sumfleth, E., & Todtenhaupt, S. (1994) · CHEMKON · doi:10.1002/ckon.19940010304 · Cited by 2
The Historiography of Scientific Revolutions: A Philosophical Reflection
Shan, Y. (2023) · Historiographies of science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-27510-4_12 · Cited by 1
Beck, P. T. L., & DYCK, M. V. (2024) · International Studies in the Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1080/02698595.2024.2418278 · Cited by 1
“Musgrave ’ s classic article, e.g. argued that after 1784 Lavoisier ’ s ‘ research programme ’ was clearly progressive, whereas phlogistonism had all the signs of a degenerative programme (Musgrave 1976).”
Epistemological Anarchism and How Science Works
Níaz, M. (2020) · Contemporary trends and issues in science education · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-36859-3_2 · Cited by 1
Kuhn, Popper, Feyerabend, Lakatos
(2001) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9780822380443-007 · Cited by 1
Níaz, M. (2020) · Contemporary trends and issues in science education · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-36859-3_3 · Cited by 1
Chang, H. (2004) · doi:10.1093/0195171276.003.0002 · Cited by 1
Cognitive Diversity and the Progress of Science
Lenhart, S. J. (2011) · UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona)
Water and the Chemical Revolution
Chang, H. (2012) · Boston studies in the philosophy of science · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-3932-1_1
The Comparative Test in Marketing Research and Theory Development
Andrus, D. M., Butler, D., & Norvell, D. W. (1987) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1177/009207038701500402
History and Philosophy of Science in Australia
Maund, B. (1992) · Nijhoff international philosophy series · doi:10.1007/978-94-015-8006-9_11
Chang, H. (2004) · doi:10.1093/0195171276.003.0003
Keeping the Fixed Points Fixed
Chang, H. (2004) · doi:10.1093/0195171276.003.0001
Goodwin, W. M. (2011) · doi:10.1093/obo/9780195396577-0018
Discovering Solidarity: Research on Solidarity as a Case of a That-What Discovery
Motrenko, J. B. (2019) · Synthese Library/Synthese library · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-23769-1_8
(2001) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9780822380443-011
(2001) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9780822380443-010
Hungary 1956 and the Inverted World
(2001) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9780822380443-013
(2001) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9780822380443-009
(2001) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9780822380443-004
The Mathematical Present as History
(2001) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9780822380443-002
(2001) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9780822380443-015
(2001) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9780822380443-001
The Method of Proofs and Refutations
(2001) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9780822380443-003
(2001) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9780822380443-008
(2001) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9780822380443-005
Classical Political Economy as a Research Programme
(2001) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9780822380443-012
(2001) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9780822380443-006
(2001) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9780822380443-014
The comparative test in marketing research and theory development
Andrus, D. M., Butler, D., & Norvell, W. (1987) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/bf02723285
Mittelstraß, J. (2016) · J.B. Metzler eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-476-00141-2_2
Fundamental Physics and the Special Vulnerability to Underdetermination
Vickers, P. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192862730.003.0006
The Tiktaalik ‘Missing Link’ Novel Predictive Success and the Evidence for Evolution
Vickers, P. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192862730.003.0004
The Historical Challenge to Future-Proof Science
Vickers, P. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192862730.003.0002
Vickers, P. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192862730.002.0004
Vickers, P. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192862730.002.0007
Scientific Knowledge in a Pandemic
Vickers, P. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192862730.003.0008
Do We Know How the Dinosaurs Died?
Vickers, P. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192862730.003.0007
Core Argument, Objections, Replies, and Outlook
Vickers, P. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192862730.003.0009
Vickers, P. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192862730.002.0006
The Judgement of the Scientific Community
Vickers, P. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192862730.003.0005
Meckel’s Successful Prediction of Gill Slits
Vickers, P. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192862730.003.0003
Vickers, P. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192862730.002.0003
The Historiography of Scientific Revolutions: A Philosophical Reflection
Shan, Y. (2023) · Historiographies of science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-99498-3_12-1
Metadata
- Authors
- Musgrave, A.
- Corresponding author
- Musgrave, Alan
- Venue
- Method and Appraisal in the Physical Sciences
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 1976-09-02
- Pages
- 181-210
- OpenAlex
- W2990970417
- Cited by
- 103
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 2.25
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy of Biology and Scientific Explanation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Logic and Philosophy of Science
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Diverse Historical and Scientific Studies
- Keywords
- chemical revolution, oxygen, phlogiston, Imre Lakatos, research programs, methodology of scientific research programmes, philosophy of science, history of chemistry, confirmation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
