Cited by 39Genetic diversity and population structureGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestockWildlife Ecology and Conservation

Using molecular methods to improve the genetic management of captive breeding programs for threatened species

Ivy, Jamie A., Lacy, Robert C.·2010·Molecular Approaches in Natural Resource Conservation and Management

Abstract

Captive breeding programs are powerful tools for the conservation of our natural resources. Both animal and plant biodiversity are in global decline (International Union for Conservation of Nature [IUCN] 2008), and the trend is for levels and rates of endangerment to continue increasing (Butchart et al. 2005; see also Chapter 1 by Honeycutt and colleagues). When in-situ conservation efforts are insufficient at stopping or reversing the decline of a species, captive populations often represent the only alternative for forestalling extinction. For example, it is currently estimated that hundreds of amphibian species will soon be extinct if emergency measures are not taken to protect populations in captivity until the threats to wild populations can be halted or overcome (Gascon et al. 2007). The success of numerous captive breeding programs has been well documented. As just a few of many examples, captive breeding programs have saved the black-footed ferret ( Mustela nigripes ), Przewalski's horse ( Equus caballus przewalskii ), and the California condor ( Gymnogyps californianus ) from final extinction (after the last wild populations were extirpated) and new wild populations of the golden lion tamarin ( Leontopithecus rosalia ), Arabian oryx ( Oryx leucoryx ), and whooping crane ( Grus americana ) have been successfully re-established from captive stocks. Conservation breeding programs aim to maintain populations that are representative of their wild counterparts, to provide…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/cbo9780511777592.012

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ivy, J. A., & Lacy, R. C.
Affiliations
  • Zoological Society of San Diego (US)
  • Brookfield Zoo Chicago (US)
Venue
Molecular Approaches in Natural Resource Conservation and Management
Published
2010-06-14
Pages
267-295
OpenAlex
W2486081710
Cited by
39
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
5.06
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Keywords
captive breeding, genetic management, threatened species, genetic diversity, inbreeding, genetic drift, pedigree analysis, molecular genetics, conservation genetics, captive populations, reintroduction, endangered species conservation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review