The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Model selection and multi-model inference
Abstract
Introduction One of the principal aims of cosmology is to identify the correct cosmological model, able to explain the available high-quality data. Determining the best model is a two-stage process. First, we must identify the set of parameters that we will allow to vary in seeking to fit the observations. As part of this process we need also to fix the allowable (prior) ranges that these parameters might take, most generally by providing a probability density function in the N -dimensional parameter space. This combination of parameter set and prior distribution is what we will call a model , and it should make calculable predictions for the quantities we are going to measure. Having chosen the model, the second stage is to determine, from the observations, the ranges of values of the parameters which are compatible with the data. This second step, parameter estimation, is described in the cosmological context by Lewis and Bridle in Chapter 3 of this volume. In this article, we shall concentrate on the choice of model. Typically, there is not a single model that we wish to fit to the data. Rather, the aim of obtaining the data is to choose between competing models, where different physical processes may be responsible for the observed outcome. This is the statistical problem of model comparison, or model selection. This is readily carried out by extending the Bayesian parameter estimation framework so that we assign probabilities to models, as well as to parameter values within those models.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Estimating landscape resistance to movement: a review
Zeller, K. A., McGarigal, K., & Whiteley, A. R. (2012) · Landscape Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10980-012-9737-0 · Cited by 1,007
Thorson, J. T. (2019) · Fisheries Research · doi:10.1016/j.fishres.2018.10.013 · Cited by 304
Is your phylogeny informative? Measuring the power of comparative methods
Boettiger, C., Coop, G., & Ralph, P. (2012) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01574.x · Cited by 245
Darwin in Mind: New Opportunities for Evolutionary Psychology
Bolhuis, J. J., Brown, G. R., Richardson, R. C., & Laland, K. N. (2011) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001109 · Cited by 242
Telomere length behaves as biomarker of somatic redundancy rather than biological age
Boonekamp, J. J., Simons, M. J. P., Hemerik, L., & Verhulst, S. (2013) · Aging Cell · doi:10.1111/acel.12050 · Cited by 200
Metadata
- Authors
- Liddle, A. R., Mukherjee, P., & Parkinson, D.
- Venue
- Bayesian Methods in Cosmology
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2009-12-10
- Pages
- 79-98
- OpenAlex
- W1751616979
- Cited by
- 893
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 347.71
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Model selection and multi-model inference. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/cbo9780511802461.005
- The paper
- Liddle, A. R., Mukherjee, P., & Parkinson, D. (2009). Model selection and multi-model inference. Bayesian Methods in Cosmology. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511802461.005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.