Cited by 200

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Telomere length behaves as biomarker of somatic redundancy rather than biological age

Boonekamp, Jelle J., Simons, Mirre J. P., Hemerik, Lia, Verhulst, Simon·2013·Aging Cell

Abstract

Summary: Biomarkers of aging are essential to predict mortality and aging‐related diseases. Paradoxically, age itself imposes a limitation on the use of known biomarkers of aging because their associations with mortality generally diminish with age. How this pattern arises is, however, not understood. With meta‐analysis we show that human leucocyte telomere length (TL) predicts mortality, and that this mortality association diminishes with age, as found for other biomarkers of aging. Subsequently, we demonstrate with simulation models that this observation cannot be reconciled with the popular hypothesis that TL is proportional to biological age. Using the reliability theory of aging, we instead propose that TL is a biomarker of somatic redundancy, the body's capacity to absorb damage, which fits the observed pattern well. We discuss to what extent diminishing redundancy with age may also explain the observed diminishing mortality modulation with age of other biomarkers of aging. Considering diminishing somatic redundancy as the causal agent of aging may critically advance our understanding of the aging process, and improve predictions of life expectancy and vulnerability to aging‐related diseases.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/acel.12050

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In humans, recent meta-analyses have indicated a strong relation between short telomeres and mortality risk, particularly at younger ages.

    “In humans, recent meta-analyses have indicated a strong relation between short telomeres and mortality risk, particularly at younger ages (Boonekamp et al., 2013).”

    From The Hallmarks of Aging (2013) · cites this paper as Boonekamp et al., 2013

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. 10.1161/01.HYP.0000027280.91984.1B · DOI
  2. 10.1097/01.ede.0000199436.55248.10 · DOI
  3. 10.18632/aging.100007 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1006/jtbi.2001.2430 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1016/j.jtbi.2011.04.026 · DOI
  6. 10.1111/j.1474-9726.2005.00171.x · DOI
  7. 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11911-8 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61778-4 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60318-4 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Boonekamp, J. J., Simons, M. J. P., Hemerik, L., & Verhulst, S.
Affiliations
  • Behavioural Biology University of Groningen Groningen the Netherlands
  • Biometris Department of Mathematical and Statistical Methods Wageningen University Wageningen the Netherlands
Venue
Aging Cell
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-02-22
Volume
12
Issue
2
Pages
330-332
ISSN
  • 1474-9718
  • 1474-9726
Cited by
200
References
4
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review