Cited by 66

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Social movements and the state: Thoughts on the policing of protest

Porta, Donatella Della·1996·Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements

Abstract

The relation between social movements and the state is a crucial theme for the understanding of collective action. Long neglected, it acquired a new relevance with the development of the“political process” approach to social movements (Tilly 1978; McAdam 1982). Within this approach, the“political opportunity structure” (POS) (Eisinger 1973; McAdam 1982; Tarrow 1983) is the most inclusive concept we have for dealing with the external, political conditions for protest. In this chapter, while referring to political opportunities for social movements in Italy and the Federal Republic of Germany after World War II, I focus on protest policing as one single variable. I consider protest policing an important barometer of the political opportunities available for social movements, and suggest it has an important effect on action repertoires. Looking at the evolution of policing styles and protest forms of action, I stress the importance of framing processes. I discuss some advantages of a research on protest policing and summarize the relevant information on the evolution of protest policing in Italy and Germany, comparing the historical evolution of policing styles in the two countries. After this description, I develop a model for the study of causes and consequences of protest policing, and propose some hypotheses on the political opportunities and constraints on protest policing, looking at the more stable political opportunities, the more volatile configuration of power, and pol…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/cbo9780511803987.005

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 66

Metadata

Authors
Porta, D. D.
Venue
Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements
Published
1996-01-26
Pages
62-92
Cited by
66
References
0

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Social movements and the state: Thoughts on the policing of protest. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/cbo9780511803987.005
The paper
Porta, D. D. (1996). Social movements and the state: Thoughts on the policing of protest. Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511803987.005