Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 5

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Gendering culture: towards a plural perspective on Kwena women's rights

Griffiths, Anne·2001·Culture and Rights

Abstract

This chapter adopts a gendered perspective on rights and culture which highlights how women and men negotiate their procreative relationships and the claims that arise from this in daily life in Botswana. Based on research carried out in the village of Molepolole between 1982 and 1989, it is a local-level ethnographic study focused on the concrete and specific ways in which gender frames the relations of power up on which negotiations concerning family relationships among Bakwena are founded, through social actors' perspectives and experiences. It thus is aligned with the shift from conceptions of ‘culture’ as representing a static, homogenous, coherent unity to a view of culture as practice, embedded in local contexts and in the multiple realities of everyday life (Bourdieu 1977; Sahlins 1976; Strathern 1980). This framework, which conceives of culture as an ongoing process, allows us to acknowledge heterogeneity in the social and legal practices shaping people's worlds and their relationship with rights (see Merry, in this volume). We may then bring together for consideration culture, rights and law in ways that undermine simple dichotomies between rights and culture. Law, culture and rights: an ethnographic perspective By taking account of the specificities of people's lives, my analysis reinforces the perspective on the relationship between culture, rights and law, that reorients the debate on human rights away from universalist/relativist polarizations.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/cbo9780511804687.007

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Metadata

Authors
Griffiths, A.
Venue
Culture and Rights
Published
2001-11-29
Pages
102-126
Cited by
5
References
0

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gendering culture: towards a plural perspective on Kwena women's rights. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/cbo9780511804687.007
The paper
Griffiths, A. (2001). Gendering culture: towards a plural perspective on Kwena women's rights. Culture and Rights. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511804687.007