The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Computer-Mediated Discourse Analysis: An Approach to Researching Online Behavior
Abstract
Over the past fifteen years, the Internet has triggered a boom in research on human behavior. As growing numbers of people interact on a regular basis in chat rooms, web forums, listservs, email, instant messaging environments and the like, social scientists, marketers, and educators look to their behavior in an effort to understand the nature of computer-mediated communication and how it can be optimized in specific contexts of use. This effort is facilitated by the fact that people engage in socially meaningful activities online in a way that typically leaves a textual trace, making the interactions more accessible to scrutiny and reflection than is the case in ephemeral spoken communication, and enabling researchers to employ empirical, micro-level methods to shed light on macro-level phenomena. Despite this potential, much research on online behavior is anecdotal and speculative, rather than empirically grounded. Moreover, Internet research often suffers from a premature impulse to label online phenomena in broad terms, for example, all groups of people interacting online are “communities”; the language of the Internet is a single style or “genre.” Notions such as community and genre are familiar and evocative, yet notoriously slippery, and unhelpful (or worse) if applied indiscriminately. An important challenge facing Internet researchers is thus how to identify and describe online phenomena in culturally meaningful terms, while at the same time grounding their distinctions in empirically observable behavior.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Discovery of Grounded Theory; Strategies for Qualitative Research
Glaser, B. G., Strauss, A. L., & Strutzel, E. (1968) · Nursing Research · doi:10.1097/00006199-196807000-00014 · Cited by 39,449
Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity
Wenger, E. (1998) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511803932 · Cited by 23,500
Austin, J. L. (1975) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198245537.001.0001 · Cited by 21,496
Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design
Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554 · Cited by 9,868
Gumperz, J. J. (1982) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511611834 · Cited by 5,861
Computer-Mediated Communication: Impersonal, Interpersonal, and Hyperpersonal Interaction
WALTHER, J. B. (1996) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/009365096023001001 · Cited by 4,798
The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier
Rheingold, H. (2000) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/7105.001.0001 · Cited by 2,105
The network nation: human communication via computer
(1993) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.31-2158 · Cited by 1,021
Tune in, Log on: Soaps, Fandom, and Online Community
Baym, N. (2000) · doi:10.4135/9781452204710 · Cited by 863
Internet Communication and Qualitative Research: A Handbook for Researching Online
Mann, C., & Stewart, F. A. (2000) · Cited by 853
Cited by
Thurlow, C. (2006) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00031.x · Cited by 326
Critical technocultural discourse analysis
Brock, A. (2018) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444816677532 · Cited by 318
Social Support and Unsolicited Advice in a Bipolar Disorder Online Forum
Vayreda, A., & Antaki, C. (2009) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/1049732309338952 · Cited by 160
Howard, C. D., Barrett, A. F., & Frick, T. W. (2010) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.2190/ec.43.1.f · Cited by 78
The making of expert patients: The role of online health communities in arthritis self-management
Willis, E. (2014) · Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1177/1359105313496446 · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- Herring, S. C.
- Venue
- Designing for Virtual Communities in the Service of Learning
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2004-03-29
- Pages
- 338-376
- OpenAlex
- W4301909976
- Cited by
- 720
- References
- 52
- FWCI
- 19.17
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Computer-Mediated Discourse Analysis: An Approach to Researching Online Behavior. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/cbo9780511805080.016
- The paper
- Herring, S. C. (2004). Computer-Mediated Discourse Analysis: An Approach to Researching Online Behavior. Designing for Virtual Communities in the Service of Learning. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511805080.016
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.