The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Meaning Medicine and the “Placebo Effect”
Abstract
Daniel Moerman presents an innovative and enlightening discussion of human reaction to the meaning of medical treatment. Traditionally, the effectiveness of medical treatments is attributed to specific elements, such as drugs or surgical procedures, but many things happen in medicine which simply cannot be accounted for in this way. The same drug can work differently when presented in different colours; drugs with widely advertised names can work better than the same drug without the name; inert drugs (placebos, dummies) often have dramatic effects on people (the 'placebo effect'); and effects can vary hugely among different European countries where the 'same' medical condition is understood differently, or has different meanings. This is true for surgery as well as for internal medicine. This lively 2002 book reviews and analyses these matters in lucid, straightforward prose, guiding the reader through a very complex body of literature, leaving nothing unexplained but avoiding any over-simplification.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Second is the patient's 'specific response' to biological, chemical, or physical intervention.”
From The Question of Efficacy (2015) · cites this paper as Moerman 2002
In the citing paper
“What Moerman calls the 'autonomous response' is the patient's ability to recover spontaneously. As Moerman puts it, abnormal conditions of the body tend to regress to the mean.”
From The Question of Efficacy (2015) · cites this paper as Moerman 2002
In the citing paper
“Moerman, a medical anthropologist and expert on ethnopharmacy, makes it clear that efficacy in health care-the response of the patient to therapy-includes several distinct things.”
From The Question of Efficacy (2015) · cites this paper as Moerman 2002
In the citing paper
“Moerman's survey of drug experiments for ulcers and hypertension show great national differences between the US, Germany, and Brazil, for both drug and placebo. The variation in placebo effectiveness, as always, 'carries over to the drug healing rate'.”
From The Question of Efficacy (2015) · cites this paper as Moerman 2002
In the citing paper
“In fact, endless confusion has arisen because the placebo itself-an inert substance, from the narrowly pharmacodynamic point of view that rigorous experimentalists insist upon-obviously cannot be what causes the physiological changes.”
From The Question of Efficacy (2015) · cites this paper as Moerman 2002
In the citing paper
“Sham surgery works even better than injection, and 'high-powered machines with snappy names . . . may be at the top of the heap'.”
From The Question of Efficacy (2015) · cites this paper as Moerman 2002
In the citing paper
“They find no significant correlation between personality traits and response.”
From The Question of Efficacy (2015) · cites this paper as Moerman 2002
Citations
Cites
The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fifteen Years of Explaining Pain: The Past, Present, and Future
Moseley, G. L., & Butler, D. S. (2015) · The Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2015.05.005 · Cited by 856
The neuroscience of placebo effects: connecting context, learning and health
Wager, T. D., & Atlas, L. Y. (2015) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3976 · Cited by 844
Placebo and the New Physiology of the Doctor-Patient Relationship
Benedetti, F. (2013) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00043.2012 · Cited by 492
Hartogsohn, I. (2016) · Journal of Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1177/0269881116677852 · Cited by 483
Psychiatry beyond the current paradigm
Bracken, P., Thomas, P., Timimi, S., Asen, E., Behr, G., Beuster, C., Bhunnoo, S., Browne, I., Chhina, N., Double, D., et al. (2012) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.112.109447 · Cited by 474
Metadata
- Authors
- Moerman, D. E.
- Affiliations
- University of Michigan–Dearborn (US)
- Corresponding author
- Moerman, Daniel E.
- ORCID
- Moerman, Daniel E.
- Venue
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2002-10-17
- OpenAlex
- W4229693527
- Cited by
- 401
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 29
- FWCI
- 6.34
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Medicine, History, and Philosophy
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Empathy and Medical Education
- Keywords
- placebo effect, placebo response, patient expectations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
