Cited by 476Mental Health and PsychiatryMental Health and Patient InvolvementHistorical Psychiatry and Medical Practices

Psychiatry beyond the current paradigm

Open access
Bracken, Pat, Thomas, Philip, Timimi, Sami, Asen, Eia, Behr, Graham, Beuster, Carl, Bhunnoo, Seth, Browne, Ivor +21 more·2012·British Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Summary: A series of editorials in this Journal have argued that psychiatry is in the midst of a crisis. The various solutions proposed would all involve a strengthening of psychiatry's identity as essentially ‘applied neuroscience’. Although not discounting the importance of the brain sciences and psychopharmacology, we argue that psychiatry needs to move beyond the dominance of the current, technological paradigm. This would be more in keeping with the evidence about how positive outcomes are achieved and could also serve to foster more meaningful collaboration with the growing service user movement.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjp.bp.112.109447

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In reality, global mental health practice tends to be rooted in biomedical psychiatric frameworks and psychopathological models that construct mental distress as an illness like any other for which a technical solution is best suited.

    “In reality, however, global mental health practice tends to be rooted in biomedical psychiatric frameworks and in psychopathological models, which construct mental distress as 'an illness like any other' for which a 'technical' solution is best suited (Bracken et al. 2012).”

    From Throwing therapy at the problem mental health and humanitarian intervention in Palabek refugee settlement, northern Uganda (2023) · cites this paper as Bracken et al. 2012

    The 'Technological paradigm' section describes psychiatry as guided by biomedical and technical models that treat mental health problems like other medical conditions and favor discrete interventions. The paper does not establish that global mental health practice specifically tends to follow those models, so the claim extends its account of psychiatry to a setting it does not assess. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The last decades have seen increasing pushback against the use and prescription of psychiatric treatment in the Global North.

    “the last decades have seen increasing pushback against the use and prescription of psychiatric treatment in the Global North (Bracken et al. 2012).”

    From Throwing therapy at the problem mental health and humanitarian intervention in Palabek refugee settlement, northern Uganda (2023) · cites this paper as Bracken et al. 2012

    The technological-paradigm section reports widespread criticism of medicalisation and expanding markets for psychotropic drugs. The recovery section describes a rapidly growing service-user movement, including groups in the UK, Europe and America that challenge biomedical approaches. These passages support increasing pushback, but not the broader claim that it is directed against the use and prescription of psychiatric treatment generally. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Pharmaceutical companies played a role in furthering the increase in psychopharmaceutical use.

    “The role of pharmaceutical companies in furthering this increase cannot be underestimated (Horwitz and Wakefield 2007;Bracken et al. 2012).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 70 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Slade M. Personal Recovery and Mental Illness. Cambridge University Press, 2009.
  2. Frank AF, Gunderson JG. The role of the therapeutic alliance in the treatment of schizophrenia. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1990; 47: 228-36.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bracken, P., Thomas, P., Timimi, S., Asen, E., Behr, G., Beuster, C., Bhunnoo, S., Browne, I., Chhina, N., Double, D., Downer, S., Evans, C., Fernando, S., Garland, M. R., Hopkins, W., Huws, R., Johnson, B., Martindale, B., Middleton, H., Moldavsky, D., Moncrieff, J., Mullins, S., Nelki, J., Pizzo, M., Rodger, J., Smyth, M., Summerfield, D., Wallace, J., & Yeomans, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Bradford (GB)
  • Lincolnshire Partnership NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Barnet Enfield and Haringey Mental Health Trust (GB)
  • University College Dublin (IE)
  • Cumbria Partnership NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • University of Bristol (GB)
  • Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • London Metropolitan University (GB)
  • Cumbria Northumberland Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
  • University College London (GB)
  • Sheffield Health and Social Care NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • St Ann’s Hospital (GB)
  • Devon Partnership NHS Trust (GB)
  • Bantry General Hospital (IE)
  • Maudsley Hospital (GB)
  • Peijas Hospital (FI)
  • Leeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Venue
British Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2012-12
Volume
201
Issue
6
Pages
430-434
ISSN
  • 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1465
OpenAlex
W2142320986
Cited by
474
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 58 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 52 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 79 · 2014: 51 · 2013: 27
FWCI
444.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Lenus, The Irish Health Repository (Dr Steevens Hospital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • Royal College of Psychiatrists
  • University College London
  • University College Dublin
  • London Metropolitan University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices
Keywords
crisis in psychiatry, applied neuroscience, technological paradigms, evidence-based outcomes, psychopharmacology, brain research
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Electroconvulsive Therapy, Humans, Mental Health, Professional Practice, Psychiatry, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Knowledge, Recovery of Function, Biomedical Technology, Evidence-Based Practice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review