The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Models for Longitudinal Network Data
Abstract
This chapter treats statistical methods for network evolution. It is argued that it is most fruitful to consider models where network evolution is represented as the result of many (usually nonobserved) small changes occurring between the consecutively observed networks. Accordingly, the focus is on models where a continuous-time network evolution is assumed, although the observations are made at discrete time points (two or more). Three models are considered in detail, all based on the assumption that the observed networks are outcomes of a Markov process evolving in continuous time. The independent arcs model is a trivial baseline model. The reciprocity model expresses effects of reciprocity, but lacks other structural effects. The actor-oriented model is based on a model of actors changing their outgoing ties as a consequence of myopic stochastic optimization of an objective function. This framework offers the flexibility to represent a variety of network effects. An estimation algorithm is treated, based on a Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) implementation of the method of moments. Some Basic Ideas About Longitudinal Social Network Data The statistical modeling of social networks is difficult because of the complicated dependence structures of the processes underlying their genesis and development. One might think that the statistical modeling of longitudinal data on social networks is more difficult than modeling single observations of social networks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2005) · Statistics for Biology and Health · doi:10.1007/0-387-27255-0_9 · Cited by 20,133
Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications
Wasserman, S. S., & Faust, K. (1994) · Cited by 17,961
Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics
Maddala, G. S. (1983) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511810176 · Cited by 13,240
A Stochastic Approximation Method
Robbins, H., & Monro, S. (1951) · The Annals of Mathematical Statistics · doi:10.1214/aoms/1177729586 · Cited by 9,643
Generalized Linear Models (2nd ed.).
Therneau, T. M., McCullagh, P., & Nelder, J. A. (1993) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2290358 · Cited by 4,907
Introduction to Mathematical Sociology.
Kish, L., & Coleman, J. S. (1965) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2575636 · Cited by 1,258
An Introduction to Stochastic Modeling
Frey, M., Taylor, H. M., & Karlin, S. (1994) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1269970 · Cited by 1,244
The Statistical Evaluation of Social Network Dynamics
Snijders, T. A. B. (2001) · Sociological Methodology · doi:10.1111/0081-1750.00099 · Cited by 1,203
Self-citationMarkov chain Monte Carlo estimation of exponential random graph models
Snijders, T. A. B. (2002) · Cited by 712
Self-citationThe Analysis of Panel Data under a Markov Assumption
Kalbfleisch, J. D., & Lawless, J. F. (1985) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1985.10478195 · Cited by 697
Cited by
Introduction to stochastic actor-based models for network dynamics
Snijders, T. A. B., van de Bunt, G. G., & Steglich, C. E. G. (2010) · Social Networks · doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2009.02.004 · Cited by 2,103
Self-citationA Survey of Statistical Network Models
Goldenberg, A., Zheng, A. X., Fienberg, S. E., & Airoldi, E. M. (2010) · Foundations and Trends® in Machine Learning · doi:10.1561/2200000005 · Cited by 819
Unanticipated Gains: Origins of Network Inequality in Everyday Life
Small, M. L. (2009) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195384352.001.0001 · Cited by 732
Network Analysis in Public Health: History, Methods, and Applications
Luke, D. A., & Harris, J. K. (2007) · Annual Review of Public Health · doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.28.021406.144132 · Cited by 709
Social selection and peer influence in an online social network
Lewis, K., Gonzalez, M., & Kaufman, J. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1109739109 · Cited by 542
Metadata
- Authors
- Snijders, T. A. B.
- Venue
- Models and Methods in Social Network Analysis
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2005-02-07
- Pages
- 215-247
- OpenAlex
- W865921456
- Cited by
- 614
- References
- 36
- FWCI
- 45.22
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Models for Longitudinal Network Data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/cbo9780511811395.011
- The paper
- Snijders, T. A. B. (2005). Models for Longitudinal Network Data. Models and Methods in Social Network Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511811395.011
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.