Introduction
Abstract
Activity theory: A well-kept secret Activity theory is a commonly accepted name for a line of theorizing and research initiated by the founders of the cultural-historical school of Russian psychology, L. S. Vygotsky, A. N. Leont'ev, and A. R. Luria, in the 1920s and 1930s. The approach has been elaborated further by a large number of contemporary scholars both in the former socialist countries and in the West. Although certain key works of Vygotsky and Luria are widely accessible and have become classic references in behavioral sciences (e.g., Vygotsky, 1978; Luria, 1976), the bulk of more recent activity-theoretical publications remain scattered and often difficult to obtain. In the United States, very few books have been published that address the central theoretical concept of activity. These include Leont'ev's (1978) Activity, Consciousness, and Personality and two edited volumes of translated texts, The Concept of Activity in Soviet Psychology (Wertsch, 1981) and Activity: Theories, Methodology and Problems (Lektorsky, 1990). The first two have been out of print for quite a while. Moreover, all three books represent exclusively Soviet views. Activity-theoretical ideas are having increased impact in specific fields of inquiry, such as learning and teaching (e.g., Moll, 1990) and human–computer interaction (e.g., Nardi, 1996). Activity theory is discussed in books attempting to formulate theories of practice (Chaiklin & Lave, 1993), distributed cognition (Salomon, 1993), a…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Engeström and Miettinen emphasise a view of contradictions as the motive force of change and development.
“Engeström and Miettinen (1999) emphasise a view of contradictions as 'the motive force of change and development' (p. 9).”
From Using activity theory and its principle of contradictions to guide research in educational technology (2008) · cites this paper as Engeström and Miettinen, 1999
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Activity Theory and Distributed Cognition: Or What Does CSCW Need to DO with Theories?
Halverson, C. A. (2002) · Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1023/a:1015298005381 · Cited by 283 · see citing works
Murphy, E., & Rodriguez-Manzanares, M. A. (2008) · Australasian Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.14742/ajet.1203 · Cited by 213 · see citing works
Mitra, D. L. (2008) · Journal of Educational Change · doi:10.1007/s10833-007-9061-7 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Siry, C., Ziegler, G., & Max, C. (2012) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.20481 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Tackling wicked problems: how theories of agency can provide new insights
Varpio, L., Aschenbrener, C., & Bates, J. (2017) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/medu.13160 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Algorithms as fetish: Faith and possibility in algorithmic work
Thomas, S. L., Nafus, D., & Sherman, J. (2018) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/2053951717751552 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Making ‘Context’ Concrete: A Dialogical Approach to the Society–Health Relation
Cornish, F. (2004) · Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1177/1359105304040894 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Residents’ perceptions of the ideal clinical teacher—A qualitative study
Boor, K., Teunissen, P. W., Scherpbier, A. J. J. A., van der Vleuten, C. P. M., van de Lande, J., & Scheele, F. (2008) · European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2008.03.010 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
The Development of Teachers’ Intercultural Competence Using a Change Laboratory Method
Teräs, M., & Lasonen, J. (2013) · Vocations and Learning · doi:10.1007/s12186-012-9087-8 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
- Authors
- Engeström, Y., & Miettinen, R.
- Affiliations
- University of California System (US)
- University of Helsinki (FI)
- Venue
- Perspectives on Activity Theory
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 1999-01-13
- Pages
- 1-16
- OpenAlex
- W807841276
- Cited by
- 228
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 4.74
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Innovative Education and Learning Practices
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Psychology of Development and Education
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Representations and Identity
- Keywords
- activity theory, historical-cultural psychology, Vygotsky, Luria, Soviet psychology, concept of activity, sociocultural psychology, distributed cognition, practice theory, learning and teaching, human-computer interaction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review