The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Register, Genre, and Style
Abstract
This book describes the most important kinds of texts in English and introduces the methodological techniques used to analyse them. Three analytical approaches are introduced and compared, describing a wide range of texts from the perspectives of register, genre and style. The primary focus of the book is on the analysis of registers. Part 1 introduces an analytical framework for studying registers, genre conventions, and styles. Part 2 provides detailed descriptions of particular text varieties in English, including spoken interpersonal varieties (conversation, university office hours, service encounters), written varieties (newspapers, academic prose, fiction), and emerging electronic varieties (e-mail, internet forums, text messages). Finally, Part 3 introduces advanced analytical approaches using corpora, and discusses theoretical concerns, such as the place of register studies in linguistics, and practical applications of register analysis. Each chapter ends with three types of activities: reflection and review activities, analysis activities, and larger project ideas.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
If you look at …: Lexical Bundles in University Teaching and Textbooks
Biber, D. (2004) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/25.3.371 · Cited by 1,539
Self-citationMetadiscourse in Academic Writing: A Reappraisal
Hyland, K. (2004) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/25.2.156 · Cited by 1,241
Styles of stance in English: Lexical and grammatical marking of evidentiality and affect
BIBER, D., & FINEGAN, E. (1989) · Text - Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse · doi:10.1515/text.1.1989.9.1.93 · Cited by 1,074
Self-citationHooking the reader: a corpus study of evaluative that in abstracts
Hyland, K., & Tse, P. (2005) · English for Specific Purposes · doi:10.1016/j.esp.2004.02.002 · Cited by 404
Danet, B. (1980) · Law & Society Review · doi:10.2307/3053192 · Cited by 376
Bringing in the Reader: Addressee Features in Academic Articles
HYLAND, K. (2001) · Written Communication · doi:10.1177/0741088301018004005 · Cited by 375
What do they mean? Questions in academic writing
HYLAND, K. (2002) · Text - Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse · doi:10.1515/text.2002.021 · Cited by 201
Charles, M. (2007) · English for Specific Purposes · doi:10.1016/j.esp.2006.08.004 · Cited by 164
Bazerman, C. (1984) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/030631284014002001 · Cited by 152
Lexical cohesion and specialized knowledge in science and popular science texts
Myers, G. (1991) · Discourse Processes · doi:10.1080/01638539109544772 · Cited by 146
Cited by
Predicting patterns of grammatical complexity across language exam task types and proficiency levels
Biber, D., Gray, B., & Staples, S. (2016) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/amu059 · Cited by 297
Self-citationGrammatical change in the noun phrase: the influence of written language use
BIBER, D., & GRAY, B. (2011) · English Language and Linguistics · doi:10.1017/s1360674311000025 · Cited by 293
Self-citation(2016) · Cited by 239
Uccelli, P., Dobbs, C. L., & Scott, J. (2013) · Written Communication · doi:10.1177/0741088312469013 · Cited by 168
Gray, B., & Biber, D. (2012) · Stance and Voice in Written Academic Genres · doi:10.1057/9781137030825_2 · Cited by 136
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Biber, D., & Conrad, S.
- Venue
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2009-10-29
- OpenAlex
- W411382560
- Cited by
- 1,980
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 99.09
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Register, Genre, and Style. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/cbo9780511814358
- The paper
- Biber, D., & Conrad, S. (2009). Register, Genre, and Style. Cambridge University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511814358
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.