The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Grammatical change in the noun phrase: the influence of written language use
Open accessAbstract
Many discussions of grammatical change have focused on grammatical innovation in the discourse contexts of conversational interaction. We argue here that it is also possible for grammatical innovation to emerge out of the communicative demands of written discourse. In particular, the distinctive communicative characteristics of academic writing (informational prose) have led to the development of a discourse style that relies heavily on nominal structures, with extensive phrasal modification and a relative absence of verbs. By tracking the historical development of this discourse style, we can also observe the development of particular grammatical functions that are emerging in writing. We focus here on two grammatical features – nouns as nominal premodifiers and prepositional phrases as nominal postmodifiers – analyzing their historical development over the last four centuries in a corpus of academic research writing (compared to other registers such as fiction, newspaper reportage and conversation). Our analysis shows that these grammatical features were quite restricted in function and variability in earlier historical periods of English. However, in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, they became much more frequent and productive, accompanied by major extensions in their functions, variants, and range of lexical associations. These extensions were restricted primarily to informational written discourse, illustrating ways in which new grammatical functions emerge in writing rather than speech.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English
Broussard, K. M., Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (2000) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3587792 · Cited by 8,193
Self-citationFoundations of Cognitive Grammar
Winters, M. E., & Langacker, R. W. (1988) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/327796 · Cited by 5,665
Variation across Speech and Writing
Biber, D. (1988) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511621024 · Cited by 5,227
Self-citationThe Cambridge Grammar of the English Language
Huddleston, R., & Pullum, G. K. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316423530 · Cited by 4,136
The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language
Huddleston, R., & Pullum, G. (2005) · Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik · doi:10.1515/zaa-2005-0209 · Cited by 2,408
Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure
(2001) · Typological Studies in Language · doi:10.1075/tsl.45 · Cited by 2,230
Hopper, P. J., & Traugott, E. C. (2003) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139165525 · Cited by 2,135
Biber, D., & Conrad, S. (2009) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511814358 · Cited by 1,980
Self-citation(2000) · Cited by 1,889
(2000) · Cited by 1,631
Cited by
Development of noun phrase complexity in the writing of English for Academic Purposes students
Parkinson, J., & Musgrave, J. (2014) · Journal of English for Academic Purposes · doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2013.12.001 · Cited by 255
Linguistic complexity in second language acquisition
Kuiken, F. (2023) · Linguistics Vanguard · doi:10.1515/lingvan-2021-0112 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- BIBER, D., & GRAY, B.
- Venue
- English Language and Linguistics
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2011-06-08
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 223-250
- ISSN
- 1360-6743 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-4379
- OpenAlex
- W2139745396
- Cited by
- 293
- References
- 29
- FWCI
- 42.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Grammatical change in the noun phrase: the influence of written language use. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s1360674311000025
- The paper
- BIBER, D., & GRAY, B. (2011). Grammatical change in the noun phrase: the influence of written language use. English Language and Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1360674311000025
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.