Cited by 485Philosophy and Theoretical ScienceMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsCognitive Science and Education Research

Meditation and the neuroscience of consciousness: an introduction

Lutz, Antoine, Dunne, John D., Davidson, Richard J.·2007·The Cambridge Handbook of Consciousness

Abstract

This chapter discusses three classes of theories: information-processing theories that build on modular elements, network theories that focus on the distributed access of conscious processing, and globalist theories that combine aspects of these two. It also discusses cognitive or functional models of consciousness with less reference to the burgeoning neuroscientific evidence that increasingly supports the globalist position. Beginning in the 1980s, a number of experimental methods gained currency as means of studying comparable conscious and non-conscious processes. The metaphor of cognitive architectures dates to the 1970s when cognitive psychologists created information-processing models of mental processes. The general position is that consciousness operates as a distributed and flexible system offering nonconscious expert systems global accessibility to information that has a high concurrent value to the organism. Future work should focus on obtaining neuroscientific evidence and corresponding behavioral observations that can address global access as the distinguishing feature of consciousness.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/cbo9780511816789.020

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other approaches study only conscious (and not unconscious) states and their changes, such as how consciousness changes under LSD, other psychotropic substances or meditation, or track changes in body ownership and map them to brain states.

    “Other approaches study only conscious (and not unconscious) states and their changes, such as how consciousness changes under the in fl uence of LSD, other psychotropic substances or meditation (Carhart-Harris et al., 2014; Lutz et al., 2007), or track changes in body ownership and map them to brain states (Faivre et al., 2015).”

    From Hard criteria for empirical theories of consciousness (2021) · cites this paper as Lutz et al., 2007

  • The meditation traditions included in the present study each put a different emphasis on the focus of the mind during meditative practice.

    “The meditation traditions included in the present study each put a different emphasis on the focus of the mind during meditative practice [15, 33, 34] (see Fig 1).”
  • The convergence and cross-fertilization of these two ways of understanding the world and human experience is presently becoming a leading current of thought and investigation in cognitive science and affective neuroscience.

    “It is presently becoming a leading current of thought and investigation in cognitive science (Varela, Thompson and Roach 1991; Thompson 2007) and affective neuroscience (Lutz, Dunne and Davidson 2007).”
  • This Innateist orientation leads to particular styles of meditation such as 'open presence' (rig-pa chôg-zhag, rig pa cog bzhag) in which one rests in the awakened awareness which is said to be our essential nature, an approach comparable to Zen's 'just sitting'.

    “This Innateist orientation leads to particular styles of meditation such as 'open presence' ( rig -pa chôg -zhag, rig pa cog bzhag ) in which one rests in the awakened awareness which is said to be our essential nature an approach comparable to Zen's 'just sitting' (Lutz, Dunne, and Davidson 2007, 511-515).”

    From Spacious Awareness in Mahāyāna Buddhism and Its Role in the Modern Mindfulness Movement (2017) · cites this paper as Lutz, Dunne, and Davidson 2007

  • The aim of Open Presence is not to withdraw from experiences, but to experience them without either objectifying phenomena or having a sense of narrative subjectivity, resulting in 'a type of ipseity or bare awareness' which is 'the simplest form of a conscious state'.

    “The aim is not to withdraw from experiences, but to experience them without either objectifying phenomena or having a sense of narrative subjectivity: the result is 'a type of ipseity or bare awareness' which is 'the simplest form of a conscious state' (Lutz, Dunne, and Davidson 2007, 508, 511-515, 524).”

    From Spacious Awareness in Mahāyāna Buddhism and Its Role in the Modern Mindfulness Movement (2017) · cites this paper as Lutz, Dunne, and Davidson 2007

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 158 · Cited by 485

Authors
Lutz, A., Dunne, J. D., & Davidson, R. J.
Affiliations
  • Emory University (US)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Venue
The Cambridge Handbook of Consciousness
Published
2007-05-14
OpenAlex
W2145030776
Cited by
485
References
158
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 36 · 2013: 37 · 2012: 27
FWCI
50.84
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Cognitive Science and Education Research
Keywords
meditation, consciousness, neuroscience of consciousness, information processing theory, network theory, cognitive architecture, distributed consciousness, unconscious processes, expert systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review