The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Cambridge Handbook of Information and Computer Ethics
Abstract
Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) have profoundly changed many aspects of life, including the nature of entertainment, work, communication, education, healthcare, industrial production and business, social relations and conflicts. They have had a radical and widespread impact on our moral lives and hence on contemporary ethical debates. The Cambridge Handbook of Information and Computer Ethics, first published in 2010, provides an ambitious and authoritative introduction to the field, with discussions of a range of topics including privacy, ownership, freedom of speech, responsibility, technological determinism, the digital divide, cyber warfare, and online pornography. It offers an accessible and thoughtful survey of the transformations brought about by ICTs and their implications for the future of human life and society, for the evaluation of behaviour, and for the evolution of moral values and rights. It will be a valuable book for all who are interested in the ethical aspects of the information society in which we live.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“It remains contested whether artificial general intelligence is achievable and, even if so, whether it could be done using current technological principles (i.e.digital computers and Turing machines) [56].”
From From computer ethics and the ethics of AI towards an ethics of digital ecosystems (2022) · cites this paper as [56]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Corporate digital responsibility
Lobschat, L., Mueller, B., Eggers, F., Brandimarte, L., Diefenbach, S., Kroschke, M., & Wirtz, J. (2021) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.10.006 · Cited by 573
Designing Robots for Care: Care Centered Value-Sensitive Design
van Wynsberghe, A. (2012) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-011-9343-6 · Cited by 428
Artificial Intelligence Crime: An Interdisciplinary Analysis of Foreseeable Threats and Solutions
King, T. C., Aggarwal, N., Taddeo, M., & Floridi, L. (2020) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-018-00081-0 · Cited by 271
“The digital nature of AI facilitates its dual-use (Moor 1985; Floridi 2010), making it feasible that applications designed for legitimate uses may then be implemented to commit criminal offences.”
BackgroundWhat Values in Design? The Challenge of Incorporating Moral Values into Design
Manders-Huits, N. (2010) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-010-9198-2 · Cited by 267
Bibliometric mapping of computer and information ethics
Heersmink, R., van den Hoven, J., van Eck, N. J., & van den Berg, J. (2011) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-011-9273-7 · Cited by 242
Metadata
- Venue
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2010-04-15
- OpenAlex
- W1775857594
- Cited by
- 210
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 17
- FWCI
- 28.00
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Information Society and Technology Trends
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Technology, Environment, Urban Planning
- Keywords
- information ethics, computer ethics, information and communication technologies, privacy, intellectual property, freedom of expression, moral responsibility, technological determinism, digital divide, cyber warfare, online pornography, information society
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
