The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Immanuel Kant: Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals: A German–English edition
Abstract
Published in 1785, the Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals is one of the most powerful texts in the history of ethical thought. In this book, Immanuel Kant formulates and justifies a supreme principle of morality that issues universal and unconditional moral commands. These commands receive their normative force from the fact that rational agents autonomously impose the moral law upon themselves. As such, they are laws of freedom. This volume contains the first facing-page German-English edition of Kant's Groundwork. It presents an authentic edition of the German text and a carefully revised version of Mary Gregor's acclaimed English translation, as well as editorial notes and a full bilingual index. It will be the edition of choice for any student or scholar who is not content with reading this central contribution to modern moral philosophy through the veil of English translation.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“they still cannot outweigh the rights to health and life, which are also linked to human dignity since they are indispensable to living in decent conditions, free of pain and dehumanisation.”
From Dark side of the principles of non-discrimination and proportionality: the case of mandatory vaccination (2025) · cites this paper as [43]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Rational Capacities, or: How to Distinguish Recklessness, Weakness, and Compulsion
Smith, M. (2003) · doi:10.1093/0199257361.003.0002 · Cited by 303
Weakness of Will and Practical Irrationality
Tappolet, C., & Stroud, S. (2003) · doi:10.1093/0199257361.001.0001 · Cited by 287
How is Strength of Will Possible?
Holton, R. (2003) · doi:10.1093/0199257361.003.0003 · Cited by 116
Kirk, H. R., Vidgen, B., Röttger, P., & Hale, S. A. (2024) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-024-00820-y · Cited by 122
Jedličková, A. (2024) · Ai & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-024-02040-9 · Cited by 91
Journalistic Autonomy: Between Structure, Agency and Institution
Sjøvaag, H. (2013) · Nordicom review/NORDICOM review · doi:10.2478/nor-2013-0111 · Cited by 89
Choosing Rationally and Choosing Correctly
Wedgwood, R. (2003) · doi:10.1093/0199257361.003.0009 · Cited by 87
Taylor, G. (2006) · doi:10.1093/0198235801.001.0001 · Cited by 84
Emotions and the Intelligibility of Akratic Action
Tappolet, C. (2003) · doi:10.1093/0199257361.003.0005 · Cited by 69
Evolutionary Economics, Responsible Innovation and Demand: Making a Case for the Role of Consumers
Schlaile, M. P., Müller, M. M., Schramm, M., & Pyka, A. (2017) · Philosophy of Management · doi:10.1007/s40926-017-0054-1 · Cited by 65
Digital enforcement: Rethinking the pursuit of a digitally‐enabled society
Andrade, A. D., & Techatassanasoontorn, A. (2020) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1111/isj.12306 · Cited by 49
Virtuous leadership – insights for the 21st century
Caldwell, C., Hasan, Z., & Smith, S. S. (2015) · Journal of Management Development · doi:10.1108/jmd-11-2014-0148 · Cited by 61
Public Policy: Why ethics matters
Boston, J., Bradstock, A., & Eng, D. (2010) · ANU Press eBooks · doi:10.26530/oapen_459474 · Cited by 72
Autonomy, Progress and Virtue: Why Kant has Nothing to Fear from the Overdemandingness Objection
Timmermann, J. (2018) · Kantian Review · doi:10.1017/s1369415418000201 · Cited by 46
White Extinction: Metaphysical Elements of Contemporary Western Fascism
Bhatt, C. (2021) · Theory, Culture & Society · doi:10.1177/0263276420925523 · Cited by 42
Weakness of Will and Practical Judgement
Stroud, S. (2003) · doi:10.1093/0199257361.003.0006 · Cited by 40
Watson, G. (2003) · doi:10.1093/0199257361.003.0008 · Cited by 39
Philosophy Unbound: The Idea of Global Philosophy
Brooks, T. (2013) · Metaphilosophy · doi:10.1111/meta.12027 · Cited by 37
The place of animals in Kantian ethics
Birch, J. C. P. (2019) · Biology & Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s10539-019-9712-0 · Cited by 12
Akrasia, Collective and Individual
Pettit, P. (2003) · Weakness of Will and Practical Irrationality · doi:10.1093/0199257361.003.0004 · Cited by 32
New trends in codes of ethics: Czech business ethics preferences by the dawn of COVID-19
Pelikánová, R. M., MacGregor, R. K., & Černek, M. (2021) · Oeconomia Copernicana · doi:10.24136/oc.2021.032 · Cited by 36
Mind the Gap: Autonomous Systems, the Responsibility Gap, and Moral Entanglement
Goetze, T. S. (2022) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3531146.3533106 · Cited by 31
Human rights violations in organ procurement practice in China
Paul, N. W., Caplan, A. L., SHAPIRO, M. E., et al. (2017) · BMC Medical Ethics · doi:10.1186/s12910-017-0169-x · Cited by 29
Kantian Dignity and its Difficulties
Ameriks, K. (2024) · doi:10.1093/9780198917656.001.0001 · Cited by 27
Pereira, G. (2020) · Philosophy and poverty · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-45795-2_4 · Cited by 27
Religion and the Highest Good: Speaking to the Heart of Even the Best of Us
Herman, B. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316421888.012 · Cited by 27
Kant on Freedom and Spontaneity
(2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316421888 · Cited by 26
How (Not) to Use the History of Political Thought for Contemporary Purposes
Blau, A. (2020) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12545 · Cited by 28
Bednar, K., & Spiekermann, S. (2023) · Business & Information Systems Engineering · doi:10.1007/s12599-023-00837-4 · Cited by 29
Professional virtue of civility and the responsibilities of medical educators and academic leaders
McCullough, L. B., Coverdale, J., & Chervenak, F. A. (2023) · Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.1136/jme-2022-108735 · Cited by 25
Dimensions of Consciousness and the Moral Status of Brain Organoids
Boyd, J. L., & Lipshitz, N. (2023) · Neuroethics · doi:10.1007/s12152-023-09538-x · Cited by 29
Engineers’ Moral Responsibility: A Confucian Perspective
Jing, S., & Doorn, N. (2019) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-019-00093-4 · Cited by 25
Scalar consequentialism the right way
Sinhababu, N. (2017) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-017-0998-y · Cited by 24
Begon, J. (2016) · Analysis · doi:10.1093/analys/anw040 · Cited by 24
Changing self-concept in the time of COVID-19: a close look at physician reflections on social media
Chiam, M., Ho, C. Y., Quah, E. L. Y., Chua, K. Z. Y., Ng, C. W. H., Lim, E. G., Tan, J. R. M., Wong, R. S. M., Ong, Y. T., Soong, Y. L., et al. (2022) · Philosophy Ethics and Humanities in Medicine · doi:10.1186/s13010-021-00113-x · Cited by 25
(Im)politeness, morality and the internet
Xie, C. (2018) · Internet Pragmatics · doi:10.1075/ip.00010.xie · Cited by 23
From Justice to Fairness: Does Kant’s Doctrine of Right Imply a Theory of Distributive Justice?1
Nance, M., & von Platz, J. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316421888.014 · Cited by 21
Does Kantian Constructivism Rest on a Mistake?
Wuerth, J. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316421888.008 · Cited by 20
Integration and authority: rescuing the ‘one thought too many’ problem
Smyth, N. (2018) · Canadian Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1080/00455091.2017.1415105 · Cited by 19
On the Many Senses of “Self-Determination”
Ameriks, K. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316421888.010 · Cited by 19
Moral Realism and the Inner Value of the World
Rauscher, F. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316421888.009 · Cited by 19
Noggle, R. (2025) · doi:10.1093/9780198924920.001.0001 · Cited by 22
Accidie, Evaluation, and Motivation
Tenenbaum, S. (2003) · doi:10.1093/0199257361.003.0007 · Cited by 19
Mayer, M. M., Buchner, A., & Bell, R. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1052729 · Cited by 24
Macro Ethics Principles for Responsible AI Systems: Taxonomy and Directions
Woodgate, J., & Ajmeri, N. (2022) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3672394 · Cited by 21
Taking Vulnerability Seriously: What Does It Change for Bioethics and Politics?
Pelluchon, C. (2016) · Ius gentium · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-32693-1_13 · Cited by 18
Johnson, J. S. (2024) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198892182.001.0001 · Cited by 17
Critical thinking in higher education: taking Stiegler’s counsel on the digital milieu
Kerruish, E. (2023) · Pedagogy Culture and Society · doi:10.1080/14681366.2023.2183983 · Cited by 17
Gould, R. K., Naranjo, Y. J., & Balvanera, P. (2024) · Ecosystems and People · doi:10.1080/26395916.2024.2427810 · Cited by 19
Homo moralis goes to the voting booth: Coordination and information aggregation
Alger, I., & Laslier, J. (2022) · Journal of Theoretical Politics · doi:10.1177/09516298221081811 · Cited by 14
Why Philosophers Shouldn’t Do Semantics
Cappelen, H. (2017) · Review of Philosophy and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s13164-017-0340-9 · Cited by 15
Political Moralism and Constitutional Reasoning: A Reply to Bernard Williams
Mann, R. (2020) · Res Publica · doi:10.1007/s11158-020-09466-0 · Cited by 14
Baz, A. (2016) · European Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1111/ejop.12163 · Cited by 14
Aristotelian Naturalism and Critical Theory
Müller, J. (2020) · Historical-analytical studies on nature, mind and action · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-37576-8_29 · Cited by 13
Algorithmic Discrimination From the Perspective of Human Dignity
Orwat, C. (2024) · Social Inclusion · doi:10.17645/si.7160 · Cited by 13
Stoker, K. L., & Stoker, M. (2012) · Journal of Mass Media Ethics · doi:10.1080/08900523.2012.636242 · Cited by 14
Can Kant’s Formula of the End in Itself Condemn Capitalism?
Furner, J. (2019) · Kantian Review · doi:10.1017/s136941541800050x · Cited by 12
Heinrichs, J.-H. (2020) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-020-09574-8 · Cited by 10
Umwelt as the foundation of an ethics of smart environments
Lecomte, P. (2023) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-023-02356-9 · Cited by 10
Good people are not like good knives
Mankowitz, P. (2023) · Noûs · doi:10.1111/nous.12472 · Cited by 9
Societal and Ethical Implications of Anti-Spoofing Technologies in Biometrics
Rebera, A. P., Bonfanti, M. E., & Venier, S. (2013) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-013-9440-9 · Cited by 9
Mintrom, M. (2010) · ANU Press eBooks · doi:10.22459/pp.10.2010.03 · Cited by 8
Gunkel, D. J. (2022) · Edition Moderne, Postmoderne · doi:10.14361/9783839462652-003 · Cited by 8
Discretion as Ethical Practice
Calder, G. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-19566-3_25 · Cited by 8
Ethical problems with kindness in healthcare
Jesudason, E. P. (2022) · Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.1136/jme-2022-108357 · Cited by 8
Duty Now and for the Future: Communication, Ethics and Artificial Intelligence
Gunkel, D. J. (2023) · Journal of Media Ethics · doi:10.1080/23736992.2023.2264854 · Cited by 8
Chambers, K. L. (2020) · Canadian Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1017/can.2020.48 · Cited by 8
Brandenburg, D. (2021) · The Monist · doi:10.1093/monist/onab013 · Cited by 7
On a Supposed Solution to the Reinhold/Sidgwick Problem in Kant'sMetaphysics of Morals
Fugate, C. D. (2012) · European Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0378.2012.00531.x · Cited by 7
Paradoxical Emotion: OnSui GenerisEmotional Irrationality
de Sousa, R. (2003) · doi:10.1093/0199257361.003.0012 · Cited by 7
Deviatko, I. F., & Bykov, A. V. (2021) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515089.2021.1950666 · Cited by 8
Nature and Agency: Towards a Post-Kantian Naturalism
Gambarotto, A., & Nahas, A. (2023) · Topoi · doi:10.1007/s11245-023-09882-w · Cited by 9
Hassen, M. Z. (2025) · EthAIca · doi:10.56294/ai2025428 · Cited by 6
Respect for autonomy: deciding what is good for oneself
Kious, B. M. (2016) · Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.1136/medethics-2015-103340 · Cited by 6
‘A Life of Our Own’: Why Authenticity is More Than a Condition for Autonomy
Iftode, C., Zorilă, A., Vică, C., & Leuenberger, M. (2023) · The Journal of Value Inquiry · doi:10.1007/s10790-023-09967-0 · Cited by 6
Pure Understanding, the Categories, and Kant’s Critique of Wolff
Chance, B. A. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316421888.003 · Cited by 6
What’s wrong with “Death by Algorithm”? Classifying dignity-based objections to LAWS
Matsumoto, M., & Arai, K. (2024) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-024-02093-w · Cited by 5
Moral bricolage and the emerging tradition of secular bioethics
Brummett, A. L., & Eberl, J. T. (2025) · Metamedicine · doi:10.1007/s11017-025-09703-8 · Cited by 6
Moral peace and moral pleasure in theAnalects
Li, P. (2021) · Dialogue · doi:10.1017/s001221732100007x · Cited by 5
Schaab, J. D. (2021) · Journal of the American Philosophical Association · doi:10.1017/apa.2020.49 · Cited by 7
How Global Is Global Justice? Towards a Global Philosophy
Brooks, T. (2014) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/9781137286406_12 · Cited by 5
Human Dignity in Europe: Introduction
Becchi, P. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-28082-0_45 · Cited by 5
Kant, Guyer, and Tomasello on the Capacity to Recognize the Humanity of Others
Thorpe, L. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316421888.007 · Cited by 5
Addressing Intelligent Systems and Ethical Design in the IEEE Code of Ethics
Adamson, G., & Herkert, J. R. (2022) · The International library of ethics, law and technology · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-86201-5_8 · Cited by 5
Johnson, J. S. (2022) · Journal for Peace and Nuclear Disarmament · doi:10.1080/25751654.2022.2102286 · Cited by 7
A Transcendental Argument for Agreement as the Sole Sufficient Basis of a Philosophical Ethic
Khushf, G. (2015) · Philosophy and medicine · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-18965-9_7 · Cited by 5
Horák, F., & Dienstbier, J. (2025) · Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.1136/jme-2023-108998 · Cited by 6
Self-control on the path toward artificial moral agency
Bello, P., & Bridewell, W. B. (2024) · Cognitive Systems Research · doi:10.1016/j.cogsys.2024.101316 · Cited by 4
Immanuel Kant and the “New Enlightenment”. International Conference Report
Startseva, A., & Sabanov, A. O. (2023) · Kantian journal · doi:10.5922/0207-6918-2023-1-7 · Cited by 4
Track Thyself? The Value and Ethics of Self-knowledge Through Technology
Leuenberger, M. (2024) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-024-00704-4 · Cited by 4
Autonomy and the ambiguity of biological rationalities: systems theory, ADHD and Kant
Andrés Haye, M., Matus, C., Cottet, P., & Niño, S. (2017) · Discourse Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education · doi:10.1080/01596306.2018.1404196 · Cited by 9
Kant on Imagination and Object Constitution
Horstmann, R. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316421888.002 · Cited by 4
Cosmetology advertising perspectives: application of ethical theories during COVID-19 crisis
Vasudevan, H., & Aslan, İ. (2021) · Marketing and Management of Innovations · doi:10.21272/mmi.2021.4-10 · Cited by 3
Pleasure is Goodness; Morality is Universal
Sinhababu, N. (2022) · Ethical Theory and Moral Practice · doi:10.1007/s10677-022-10331-7 · Cited by 5
The roles of the analogy with natural selection in B.F. Skinner’s philosophy
Smith, T. L. (2018) · Behavioural Processes · doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2018.02.007 · Cited by 4
Kornilaev, L. Y. (2019) · Kantian journal · doi:10.5922/0207-6918-2019-4-4 · Cited by 4
Prudence and the Temporal Structure of Practical Reasons
MacIntosh, D. (2003) · doi:10.1093/0199257361.003.0010 · Cited by 4
Compulsory vaccination protects autonomy
Gooch, G., & Graber, A. D. (2023) · Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.1136/jme-2023-109426 · Cited by 3
The Ableist stare: an interdisciplinary, narrative-driven exploration of staring at disabled bodies
Schmid, S. J. (2024) · Medical Humanities · doi:10.1136/medhum-2023-012636 · Cited by 3
Taher, T., Goutallier, C., Kirkland, K., & Bastian, B. B. (2025) · Journal of Happiness Studies · doi:10.1007/s10902-025-00918-z · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Kant, I.
- Corresponding author
- Kant, Immanuel
- Venue
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2011-02-03
- OpenAlex
- W4303100596
- Cited by
- 356
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 39 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 58 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 6.75
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Kantian Philosophy and Modern Interpretations
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophy and Historical Thought
- Keywords
- Immanuel Kant, Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, moral law, supreme principle of morality, autonomy, rational agents, Kantian ethics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review