Cited by 11Paleopathology and ancient diseasesForensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology StudiesLatin American history and culture

Cranial trauma and cranial modification in post-imperial Andahuaylas, Peru

Kurin, Danielle·2014·Bioarchaeological and Forensic Perspectives on Violence

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/cbo9781107051409.018

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Kurin (2014) correlates head shape with changing group boundaries, warfare, and mobility.

    “Kurin (2014) also tackles this topic by correlating head shape with changing group boundaries, and interestingly, with warfare and mobility, as well.”

    From Cranial modification and the shapes of heads across the Andes (2020) · cites this paper as Kurin (2014)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kurin, D.
Corresponding author
Kurin, Danielle
Venue
Bioarchaeological and Forensic Perspectives on Violence
Published
2014-03-13
Pages
236-260
OpenAlex
W1604579840
Cited by
11
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
4.28
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Paleopathology and ancient diseases
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Latin American history and culture
Keywords
cranial trauma, cranial modification, Andahuaylas, Andean archaeology, skeletal remains

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review