Cited by 14Reading and Literacy DevelopmentNarrative Theory and AnalysisNeurobiology of Language and Bilingualism

Situation models in naturalistic comprehension

Kurby, Christopher A., Zacks, Jeffrey M.·2015·Cognitive Neuroscience of Natural Language Use

Abstract

Reading a discourse often leads to the construction of a situation model – a mental representation of the state of affairs described by the text. Situation model construction is associated with specific behavioral and neural markers. In this chapter, we consider the following questions: How does reading that involves constructing a situation model differ from other kinds of reading? Do the behavioral and neurophysiological data support a distinction between incremental updating of situation model components and global updating by abandoning an old situation model to form a new one? Do situation models represent information about sensory and motor features in analog representational formats during normal reading for comprehension? The available results indicate that specific mechanisms underlie different forms of situation model updating, that situation model-based reading is qualitatively different from reading without forming situation models, and that readers routinely deploy perceptual and motor representations to understand features of the situations described by a narrative. Reading is a cognitive tour de force. Just guiding the eyes to focus on the right part of the text at the right time is exquisitely complex (Rayner, Raney, & Pollatsek, 1995 ). Readers do this effortlessly, and also recognize complex patterns to identify letters, words, and larger units of text, parse strings of words into sentences, and recognize the meanings of words and sentences. However, to us t…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/cbo9781107323667.004

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 63 · Cited by 14

Authors
Kurby, C. A., & Zacks, J. M.
Venue
Cognitive Neuroscience of Natural Language Use
Published
2015-02-12
Pages
59-76
OpenAlex
W2492492720
Cited by
14
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2017: 2
FWCI
1.30
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Narrative Theory and Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Keywords
situation model, narrative comprehension, perceptual representation, motor representations, naturalistic reading, language comprehension, mental representation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review