Situation models in naturalistic comprehension
Abstract
Reading a discourse often leads to the construction of a situation model – a mental representation of the state of affairs described by the text. Situation model construction is associated with specific behavioral and neural markers. In this chapter, we consider the following questions: How does reading that involves constructing a situation model differ from other kinds of reading? Do the behavioral and neurophysiological data support a distinction between incremental updating of situation model components and global updating by abandoning an old situation model to form a new one? Do situation models represent information about sensory and motor features in analog representational formats during normal reading for comprehension? The available results indicate that specific mechanisms underlie different forms of situation model updating, that situation model-based reading is qualitatively different from reading without forming situation models, and that readers routinely deploy perceptual and motor representations to understand features of the situations described by a narrative. Reading is a cognitive tour de force. Just guiding the eyes to focus on the right part of the text at the right time is exquisitely complex (Rayner, Raney, & Pollatsek, 1995 ). Readers do this effortlessly, and also recognize complex patterns to identify letters, words, and larger units of text, parse strings of words into sentences, and recognize the meanings of words and sentences. However, to us t…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The study used naturalistic texts that facilitated natural reading.
“we used naturalistic texts that facilitated natural reading.”
From The effects of reading narrative fiction on social and moral cognition (2021) · cites this paper as Kurby & Zacks, 2015
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 63 · Cited by 14
- Authors
- Kurby, C. A., & Zacks, J. M.
- Venue
- Cognitive Neuroscience of Natural Language Use
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2015-02-12
- Pages
- 59-76
- OpenAlex
- W2492492720
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 63
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 1.30
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Narrative Theory and Analysis
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Keywords
- situation model, narrative comprehension, perceptual representation, motor representations, naturalistic reading, language comprehension, mental representation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review