British Economic Growth, 1270–1870
Open accessAbstract
This is a definitive new account of Britain's economic evolution from a backwater of Europe in 1270 to the hub of the global economy in 1870. A team of leading economic historians reconstruct Britain's national accounts for the first time right back into the thirteenth century to show what really happened quantitatively during the centuries leading up to the Industrial Revolution. Contrary to traditional views of the earlier period as one of Malthusian stagnation, they reveal how the transition to modern economic growth built on the earlier foundations of a persistent upward trend in GDP per capita which doubled between 1270 and 1700. Featuring comprehensive estimates of population, land use, agricultural production, industrial and service-sector production and GDP per capita, as well as analysis of their implications, this will be an essential reference for anyone interested in British economic history and the origins of modern economic growth more generally.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Mechanics of the Industrial Revolution
Kelly, M., Mokyr, J., & Ó Gráda, C. (2023) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/720890 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Living standards and mortality since the middle ages
Kelly, M., & Ó Gráda, C. (2014) · The Economic History Review · doi:10.1111/1468-0289.12023 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Measuring Colonial Extraction: The East India Company’s Rule and the Drain of Wealth (1757–1858)
Nogues-Marco, P. (2021) · Capitalism: A Journal of History and Economics · doi:10.1353/cap.2021.0004 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
- Authors
- Broadberry, S., Campbell, B., Klein, A., Overton, M., & van Leeuwen, B.
- Affiliations
- London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
- Queen's University Belfast (GB)
- University of Kent (GB)
- University of Exeter (GB)
- Venue
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2014-12-31
- OpenAlex
- W1873929109
- Cited by
- 554
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 55 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 92 · 2020: 66 · 2019: 82 · 2018: 71 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 42 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 41.93
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- wrap.warwick.ac.uk
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- KNAW Research Portal (The Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences) (publishedVersion)
- Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick) (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Thammasat University Digital Collections (submittedVersion)
- TU Digital Collections (Thammasat University) (submittedVersion)
- Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent) (submittedVersion)
- University of Warwick (cc-by)
- Funders
- Leverhulme Trust
- European Commission
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Historical Economic and Social Studies
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Growth and Productivity
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economic Theory and Policy
- Keywords
- British economic growth, British economic history, GDP per capita, Malthusian stagnation, population estimates, land use, agricultural production, industrial production, service sector, long-term economic development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review