Meaning and Relevance
Abstract
When people speak, their words never fully encode what they mean, and the context is always compatible with a variety of interpretations. How can comprehension ever be achieved? Wilson and Sperber argue that comprehension is a process of inference guided by precise expectations of relevance. What are the relations between the linguistically encoded meanings studied in semantics and the thoughts that humans are capable of entertaining and conveying? How should we analyse literal meaning, approximations, metaphors and ironies? Is the ability to understand speakers' meanings rooted in a more general human ability to understand other minds? How do these abilities interact in evolution and in cognitive development? Meaning and Relevance sets out to answer these and other questions, enriching and updating relevance theory and exploring its implications for linguistics, philosophy, cognitive science and literary studies.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Relevance of input is greater when a greater cognitive effect is achieved with a smaller mental effort invested.
“Accordingly, the relevance of input is greater when a greater cognitive effect is achieved with a smaller mental effort invested (Wilson and Sperber 2012, 6).”
From Unlocking the Secrets of Clickbait Creation: A Relevance-Theoretic Analysis of the Chatbot-Produced Clickbait Headlines (2025) · cites this paper as Wilson and Sperber 2012, 6
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Luyten, P., Campbell, C., & Fonagy, P. (2020) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/jopy.12483 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
Ivković, G. (2025) · Facta Universitatis Series: Linguistics and Literature · doi:10.22190/full250724016i
- Authors
- Wilson, D., & Sperber, D.
- Affiliations
- University College London (GB)
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Venue
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2012-03-22
- OpenAlex
- W182645068
- Cited by
- 901
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 75 · 2025: 53 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 56 · 2022: 59 · 2021: 63 · 2020: 60 · 2019: 124 · 2018: 89 · 2017: 64 · 2016: 92 · 2015: 49 · 2014: 35 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 54.18
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Linguistics and Discourse Analysis
- Keywords
- relevance theory, pragmatic inference, literal meaning, metaphor, irony, approximation, theory of mind, comprehension, cognitive evolution, cognitive development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review