The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Esotericism and the Academy: Rejected Knowledge in Western Culture
Abstract
Academics tend to look on 'esoteric', 'occult' or 'magical' beliefs with contempt, but are usually ignorant about the religious and philosophical traditions to which these terms refer, or their relevance to intellectual history. Wouter Hanegraaff tells the neglected story of how intellectuals since the Renaissance have tried to come to terms with a cluster of 'pagan' ideas from late antiquity that challenged the foundations of biblical religion and Greek rationality. Expelled from the academy on the basis of Protestant and Enlightenment polemics, these traditions have come to be perceived as the Other by which academics define their identity to the present day. Hanegraaff grounds his discussion in a meticulous study of primary and secondary sources, taking the reader on an exciting intellectual voyage from the fifteenth century to the present day and asking what implications the forgotten history of exclusion has for established textbook narratives of religion, philosophy and science.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“One could argue that the study of “Western esotericism” simply charts the complex reception-history and related developments, from the Renaissance through today, regarding the sources that Dillon refers to as “some loose ends” in the study of Middle Platonism: the aforementioned “Platonic Underworld””
From New Approaches to the Study of Esotericism (2021) · cites this paper as Hanegraaff, 2012
In the citing paper
“Hanegraaff is of course correct that narratives which identify ultimate wisdom as being both primordial and derived of some “eastern” (or better, “barbarian”-see below) provenance are central to both the notions of the “Platonic Underworld” and the greater relationship of esotericism to antiquity.”
From New Approaches to the Study of Esotericism (2021) · cites this paper as Hanegraaff, 2012
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Initiation into the Mysteries of the Ancient World
Bremmer, J. N. (2014) · De Gruyter eBooks · doi:10.1515/9783110299557 · Cited by 269
Asprem, E., & Dyrendal, A. (2015) · Journal of Contemporary Religion · doi:10.1080/13537903.2015.1081339 · Cited by 108
The Cambridge Intellectual History of Byzantium
(2017) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781107300859 · Cited by 92
Magic and Politics: Conspirituality and COVID-19
Parmigiani, G. (2021) · Journal of the American Academy of Religion · doi:10.1093/jaarel/lfab053 · Cited by 71
Noakes, R. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316882436 · Cited by 67
Metadata
- Authors
- Hanegraaff, W. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Amsterdam (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Hanegraaff, Wouter J.
- Venue
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 2012-01-19
- OpenAlex
- W4235179627
- Cited by
- 354
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 22 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 100 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 18.87
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
- Keywords
- esotericism, occultism, magic, pagan traditions, late antiquity, intellectual history, Protestant polemics, Enlightenment, biblical religion, religious otherness, history of religions, history of philosophy, history of science
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review