The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Deciding for Others: The Ethics of Surrogate Decision Making
Abstract
This book is the most comprehensive treatment available of one of the most urgent - and yet in some respects most neglected - problems in bioethics: decision-making for incompetents. Part I develops a general theory for making treatment and care decisions for patients who are not competent to decide for themselves. It provides an in-depth analysis of competence, articulates and defends a coherent set of principles to specify suitable surrogate decisionmakers and to guide their choices, examines the value of advance directives, and investigates the role that considerations of cost ought to play in decisions concerning incompetents. Part II applies this theoretical framework to the distinctive problems of three important classes of individuals, many of whom are incompetent: minors, the elderly and psychiatric patients. The authors' approach combines a probing analysis of fundamental issues in ethical theory with a sensitive awareness of the concrete realities of health care institutions and the highly personal and individual character of difficult practical problems. Its broad scope will appeal to health professionals, moral philosophers and lawyers alike.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Buchanan and Brock [26] state that decision-making capacity is a matter of minor differences (gradual model) and competence is either present or not (threshold model).”
From Why is it hard to make progress in assessing children's decision-making competence? (2015) · cites this paper as [26]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 491
The Role of Decision-Making Capacity in Gathering Collateral Information
Dickson, K. S., Gala, G. J., & Moseley, D. D. (2023) · The Journal of Clinical Ethics · doi:10.1086/724231 · Cited by 2
Philosophy of Childhood and Its Implications for the Age of Consent
Sharan, P. (2023) · Journal of Indian Association for Child and Adolescent Mental Health · doi:10.1177/09731342231176389 · Cited by 2
Ethical Analysis of the Decision-making Process for Patients with Acute Severe Stroke*
Kim, D.-K., & Kim, W. (2023) · Korean Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.35301/ksme.2023.26.2.87 · Cited by 2
Ethical Principles and Legal Provisions
Cippitani, R. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-42944-6_20 · Cited by 2
“STOP”‐ping harm: When is state intervention justified?
Swota, A. H., & Bradfield, S. M. (2009) · Pediatric Blood & Cancer · doi:10.1002/pbc.22171 · Cited by 2
Rhodes, R., & Holzman, I. R. (2004) · International library of ethics, law, and the new medicine/The international library of ethics, law, and the new medicine · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-2552-5_13 · Cited by 2
The Use of Advance Directives in the Context of Limited Resources for Healthcare
Horn, R., & ter Meulen, R. (2013) · International library of ethics, law, and the new medicine/The international library of ethics, law, and the new medicine · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-7377-6_12 · Cited by 2
The Authority of Advance Directives
den Hartogh, G. (2012) · Library of ethics and applied philosophy · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-5335-8_10 · Cited by 2
Rich, B. A., Casarett, D., & Battin, M. P. (2005) · Pain Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1526-4637.2005.00074.x · Cited by 2
Vertegenwoordiging en verantwoordelijkheid
Touwen, D. P., Cools, H. J. M., & Engberts, D. P. (2010) · Tijdschrift voor Gerontologie en Geriatrie · doi:10.1007/s12439-010-0004-z · Cited by 2
Evaluating Potential Guardians for Adults Adjudicated Incompetent: Table 1.
Demakis, G. J. (2016) · Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology · doi:10.1093/arclin/acw047 · Cited by 2
Ethical Issues in Tissue Engineering
Gelhaus, P. (2009) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-77755-7_3 · Cited by 2
In the Balance: Weighing Preferences of Decisionally Incapacitated Patients
Guidry-Grimes, L. K. (2018) · The Hastings Center Report · doi:10.1002/hast.855 · Cited by 2
El marco normativo de la investigación biomédica en personas con demencia
Seoane, J., & Lata, N. Á. (2020) · Derecho Privado y Constitución · doi:10.18042/cepc/dpc.36.04 · Cited by 2
Gert, B., Culver, C. M., & Clouser, K. D. (2006) · Bioethics · doi:10.1093/0195159063.003.0002 · Cited by 2
Precedent Autonomy and Personal Identity
Quante, M. (2001) · International library of ethics, law, and the new medicine/The international library of ethics, law, and the new medicine · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-2572-9_22 · Cited by 2
On What Grounds? A Pilot Study of References Used in Clinical Ethics Consultation and Education
Turner, K., Brummett, A. L., & Salter, E. K. (2024) · HEC Forum · doi:10.1007/s10730-024-09532-7 · Cited by 2
Wille oder Indiz für mutmaßlichen Willen?
Mona, M. (2008) · Ethik in der Medizin · doi:10.1007/s00481-008-0570-6 · Cited by 2
Former Wishes and Current Desires
Touwen, D. P. (2012) · Ethics and health policy · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-3870-6_9 · Cited by 2
When mediation fails: identifying and working with inappropriate surrogate decision makers
Jimenez, X. F., Hernandez, J. O., & Robinson, E. M. (2014) · Progress in Palliative Care · doi:10.1179/1743291x14y.0000000115 · Cited by 2
Bernat, E. R. (2001) · MedR. Schriftenreihe Medizinrecht · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-59489-2_9 · Cited by 2
Ethics Consultation: Refusal of Beneficial Treatment by a Surrogate Decision Maker
Spike, J. P., & Greenlaw, J. L. (1995) · The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics · doi:10.1111/j.1748-720x.1995.tb01352.x · Cited by 2
Ethical Considerations in Apathy Syndromes
Krupp, B. H. (1997) · Psychiatric Annals · doi:10.3928/0048-5713-19970101-12 · Cited by 2
Feenan, D. K. (1997) · Health Care Analysis · doi:10.1007/bf02678381 · Cited by 2
Early Integration of Pediatric Participation in Health Care as Preventive Ethics
Dalgo, A. (2018) · The American Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.1080/15265161.2017.1418930 · Cited by 2
The Unavailability of the Ordinary: Strauss on the Philosophical Fate of Modernity
Pippin, R. B. (2005) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511614637.007 · Cited by 2
Who Makes Decisions for Vulnerable Young People? Shifting Sands and Murky Waters
Kertesz, M., Spriggs, M. P., & Humphreys, C. (2018) · Australian Social Work · doi:10.1080/0312407x.2018.1464585 · Cited by 1
Personal Identity and the Moral Authority of Advance Directives
Witt, K. (2020) · The International Library of Bioethics · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-56703-3_4 · Cited by 1
Pugh, J. (2024) · Ethical Theory and Moral Practice · doi:10.1007/s10677-024-10471-y · Cited by 2
Johnson, L. S. M., & Cerminara, K. L. (2025) · Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics · doi:10.1017/s0963180124000793 · Cited by 1
Pais, P. J., Lanewala, A. A., Levy, C. S., et al. (2025) · Pediatric Nephrology · doi:10.1007/s00467-024-06649-2 · Cited by 1
Nguyen, E., Appiah, D., Ne’eman, A., et al. (2025) · Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics · doi:10.1177/15562646251338183 · Cited by 1
Value Bias and Ethnocentrism and its Effect on Advance Care Planning: Mind the Gap
Berger, J. T., & Miller, D. R. (2025) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-025-10031-9 · Cited by 1
Irrational People Have Rights Too
Appel, J. M. (2026) · Journal of Bioethical Inquiry · doi:10.1007/s11673-025-10527-3 · Cited by 1
Funer, F., & Hempeler, C. (2026) · Frontiers in Digital Health · doi:10.3389/fdgth.2026.1784416 · Cited by 1
Replacing Surrogate Decision-Making with Supported Decision-Making for Minimal Risk Research
Hawkins, J., Segal, A. E., Wendler, D. S., et al. (2026) · The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics · doi:10.1017/jme.2025.10192 · Cited by 1
Bravo, G., & Bernier, L. (2026) · Canadian Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.7202/1126615ar · Cited by 1
Vertegenwoordiging en verantwoordelijkheid
Touwen, D. P., Cools, H. J. M., & Engberts, D. P. (2010) · Tijdschrift voor Gerontologie en Geriatrie · doi:10.1007/bf03096176 · Cited by 1
Lasting power of attorney: a significant ethical responsibility
Lund, S. (2015) · British Journal of Hospital Medicine · doi:10.12968/hmed.2015.76.9.518 · Cited by 1
Les dilemmes éthiques chez les enfants gravement malades – Un modèle de rapprochement
Carnevale, F. A. (2003) · InfoKara · doi:10.3917/inka.032.0073 · Cited by 1
Addressing goals of care in the never-competent patient
Wu, K. L., Reinemann, J. M., & Lapid, M. I. (2017) · Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability · doi:10.3109/13668250.2017.1384905 · Cited by 1
McMahan, J. (2002) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/0195079981.003.0005 · Cited by 1
Gert, B., Culver, C. M., & Clouser, K. D. (2006) · Bioethics · doi:10.1093/0195159063.003.0007 · Cited by 1
McMahan, J. (2002) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/0195079981.003.0001 · Cited by 1
Intervening in the psychopath’s brain
Glannon, W. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/med/9780198758853.003.0007 · Cited by 1
Husebo, S. B., & Mathis, G. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-49039-6_2 · Cited by 1
Gert, B., Culver, C. M., & Clouser, K. D. (2006) · Bioethics · doi:10.1093/0195159063.003.0005 · Cited by 1
Health Care System Distrust, Race, and Surrogate Decision-Making Regarding Code Status
Na, S. Y., Slaven, J. E., Burke, E. S., et al. (2022) · Health Equity · doi:10.1089/heq.2022.0044 · Cited by 1
MacKay, D., & Huber-Disla, A. (2023) · Economics and Philosophy · doi:10.1017/s0266267123000172 · Cited by 1
Pediatric Assent in Clinical Practice: A Critical Scoping Review
Wasserman, J. A., Najor, A. N., Liogas, N., et al. (2024) · AJOB Empirical Bioethics · doi:10.1080/23294515.2024.2388517 · Cited by 1
Resnik, D. B. (2024) · The International Library of Bioethics · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-82757-0_5 · Cited by 1
Black, O. (2005) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511494666.007 · Cited by 1
Ross, L. F., & Thistlethwaite, J. R. (2016) · International library of ethics, law, and the new medicine/The international library of ethics, law, and the new medicine · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-29185-7_1 · Cited by 1
Introduction: “Bourgeois Philosophy” and the Problem of the Subject
Pippin, R. B. (2005) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511614637.002 · Cited by 1
Per se rules and rules of reason
Black, O. (2005) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511494666.005 · Cited by 1
Woods, S. (2016) · Journal of Paramedic Practice · doi:10.12968/jpar.2016.8.10.499 · Cited by 1
Libertarian perspectives on paternalism
Vallentyne, P. L. (2018) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315657080-16 · Cited by 1
Treating psychiatric disorders: Less invasive and noninvasive interventions
Glannon, W. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/med/9780198758853.003.0004 · Cited by 1
Precautionary Reasoning and the Precautionary Principle
Resnik, D. B. (2021) · The International Library of Bioethics · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-70791-0_5 · Cited by 1
Communication with Brain–Computer Interfaces in Medical Decision-Making
Glannon, W. (2021) · Contemporary clinical neuroscience · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-54564-2_8 · Cited by 1
Resnik, D. B. (2018) · International library of ethics, law, and the new medicine/The international library of ethics, law, and the new medicine · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-68756-8_5 · Cited by 1
Pediatric Ethics Issues and Clinical Ethics Consultation in the United States
Hester, D. M. (2022) · Philosophy and medicine · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-91916-0_23 · Cited by 1
Deciding in the Best Interest of Clients with Dementia: The Experience of Public Guardians
Taylor, H. A., Black, B. S., & Rabins, P. V. (2008) · The Journal of Clinical Ethics · doi:10.1086/jce200819203 · Cited by 1
Long-term care: myth and reality
Agich, G. J. (2003) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511545801.004 · Cited by 1
Euthanasia, Individual Choice and the Family: A Hong Kong Perspective
Chan, H. M. (2002) · Philosophy and medicine · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-0902-6_9 · Cited by 1
Leeftijdsdiscriminatie, bestaat dat?
den Hartogh, G. (1994) · Tijdschrift voor Gezondheidsrecht · doi:10.1007/bf03055668 · Cited by 1
Milleson, V. M. (2016) · AJOB Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/21507740.2016.1146371 · Cited by 1
Making Decisions for Minors: Do Parents Have the Final Say? Case Study and Commentaries
Weinstein, B. D., & Weinstein, G. W. (1992) · Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina · doi:10.3928/1542-8877-19920301-17 · Cited by 1
Black, O. (2005) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511494666.004 · Cited by 1
McMillan, J. R. (2013) · The International Encyclopedia of Ethics · doi:10.1002/9781444367072.wbiee064 · Cited by 1
Arima, H., & Akabayashi, A. (2014) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-05544-2_8-1 · Cited by 1
Arima, H., & Akabayashi, A. (2016) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-09483-0_8 · Cited by 1
Why Not Jump out of Decision-Making Capacity?
Cong, Y. (2022) · The American Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.1080/15265161.2022.2127969 · Cited by 1
Lorem Ipsum is simply dummy text of the printing and typesetting industry.
Ipsum, L. (2025) · Pediatría Integral · doi:10.63149//j.pedint.53 · Cited by 1
Ross, L. F. (2025) · The American Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.1080/15265161.2025.2554787 · Cited by 1
A Two Pronged Test for Surgical Decision-Making in the Cognitively Impaired Patient
Lattanzi, C. (2003) · HEC Forum · doi:10.1023/a:1023235807147
Vig, E. K., Gustin, A. N., & Fryer-Edwards, K. A. (2010) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511841361.006
Black, O. (2005) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511494666.002
Elternautorität und Legitimität – über die normativen Grenzen religiöser Erziehung
Bagattini, A. (2015) · Zeitschrift für Praktische Philosophie · doi:10.22613/zfpp/2.1.6
Ethical Considerations in Pediatric Oncology: A Case‐Based Psychosocial Overview
Blum, R., & Martin, A. (2012) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119941033.ch20
Gadamer's Hegel: Subjectivity and Reflection
Pippin, R. B. (2005) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511614637.005
Withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining intervention from neonates
Beckstrom, A. C., & Woodrum, D. E. (2011) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511740336.016
Children’s Well-Being and the Family-Dilemma
Bagattini, A. (2014) · Children's well-being · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-9252-3_12
Autonomy and long-term care: another look
Agich, G. J. (2003) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511545801.007
Calder, I., & Pearce, A. (2010) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511760310.031
The liberal theory of autonomy
Agich, G. J. (2003) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511545801.003
Agich, G. J. (2003) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511545801.002
Black, O. (2005) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511494666.003
Applied Analysis of ATM’S RAIC to Healthcare Ethics Committees in Africa
Osuji, P. I. (2014) · Advancing global bioethics · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-05891-7_5
Agich, G. J. (2003) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511545801.005
Black, O. (2005) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511494666.006
Agich, G. J. (2003) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511545801.001
Particular Moral Rules and Special Duties
Gert, B., Culver, C. M., & Clouser, K. D. (2006) · Bioethics · doi:10.1093/0195159063.003.0004
Medical Practice and Social Authority in Modernity
Pippin, R. B. (2005) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511614637.013
What Doctors Must Know about Medical Practice
Gert, B., Culver, C. M., & Clouser, K. D. (2006) · Bioethics · doi:10.1093/0195159063.003.0008
A phenomenological view of actual autonomy
Agich, G. J. (2003) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511545801.006
Death, Dying and Bioethics: Current Issues in the USA
Bendiksen, R. A. (1997) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-25593-1_15
The spectrum from independent action to collusion
Black, O. (2005) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511494666.008
Religion as a Controlling Interference in Medical Decision Making by Minors
Will, J. F. (2017) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316691274.031
Accounting for Patients’ Religious Beliefs
Lynch, H. F., Cohen, I. G., & Sepper, E. (2017) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316691274.027
Metadata
- Authors
- Buchanan, A. E., & Brock, D. W.
- Affiliations
- University of Arizona (US)
- Brown University (US)
- Venue
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 1990-01-26
- OpenAlex
- W4241880035
- Cited by
- 516
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 4.34
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
- Keywords
- surrogate decision-making, competence, advance directives, minors, elderly patients, psychiatric patients, treatment decision-making, bioethics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
