The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Deciding for Others: The Ethics of Surrogate Decision Making
Abstract
This book is the most comprehensive treatment available of one of the most urgent - and yet in some respects most neglected - problems in bioethics: decision-making for incompetents. Part I develops a general theory for making treatment and care decisions for patients who are not competent to decide for themselves. It provides an in-depth analysis of competence, articulates and defends a coherent set of principles to specify suitable surrogate decisionmakers and to guide their choices, examines the value of advance directives, and investigates the role that considerations of cost ought to play in decisions concerning incompetents. Part II applies this theoretical framework to the distinctive problems of three important classes of individuals, many of whom are incompetent: minors, the elderly and psychiatric patients. The authors' approach combines a probing analysis of fundamental issues in ethical theory with a sensitive awareness of the concrete realities of health care institutions and the highly personal and individual character of difficult practical problems. Its broad scope will appeal to health professionals, moral philosophers and lawyers alike.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Buchanan and Brock [26] state that decision-making capacity is a matter of minor differences (gradual model) and competence is either present or not (threshold model).”
From Why is it hard to make progress in assessing children's decision-making competence? (2015) · cites this paper as [26]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
McMahan, J. (2002) · doi:10.1093/0195079981.001.0001 · Cited by 1,589
Informed Consent in Decision-Making in Pediatric Practice
Katz, A. L., Webb, S. A., Macauley, R. C., Mercurio, M. R., Moon, M. R., Okun, A. L., Opel, D. J., & Statter, M. B. (2016) · PEDIATRICS · doi:10.1542/peds.2016-1485 · Cited by 696
Parental refusals of medical treatment: the harm principle as threshold for state intervention
Diekema, D. S. (2004) · Metamedicine · doi:10.1007/s11017-004-3146-6 · Cited by 600
Responding to Parental Refusals of Immunization of Children
Diekema, D. S. (2005) · PEDIATRICS · doi:10.1542/peds.2005-0316 · Cited by 294
Projection in surrogate decisions about life-sustaining medical treatments.
Fagerlin, A., Ditto, P. H., Danks, J. H., & Houts, R. (2001) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/0278-6133.20.3.166 · Cited by 273
The Persistence of Subjectivity
Pippin, R. B. (2005) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511614637 · Cited by 226
Ardern, C. L., Ekås, G. R., Grindem, H., Moksnes, H., Anderson, A. F., Chotel, F., Cohen, M., Forssblad, M. L., Ganley, T. J., Feller, J. A., et al. (2018) · British Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1136/bjsports-2018-099060 · Cited by 208
Consensus on guidelines for stereotactic neurosurgery for psychiatric disorders
Nuttin, B., Wu, H., Mayberg, H. S., Hariz, M. I., Gabriëls, L. A., Galert, T., Merkel, R., Kubu, C. S., Vilela-Filho, O., Matthews, K., et al. (2014) · Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp-2013-306580 · Cited by 198
The value of autonomy in medical ethics
Varelius, J. (2006) · Medicine Health Care and Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s11019-006-9000-z · Cited by 198
Sreenivasan, G. (2010) · Ethics · doi:10.1086/652303 · Cited by 196
Substituted Judgment: The Limitations of Autonomy in Surrogate Decision Making
Torke, A. M., Alexander, G. C., & Lantos, J. D. (2008) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-008-0688-8 · Cited by 191
Why is it hard to make progress in assessing children's decision-making competence?
Hein, I. M., Troost, P. W., Broersma, A., de Vries, M. C., Daams, J. G., & Lindauer, R. J. L. (2015) · BMC Medical Ethics · doi:10.1186/1472-6939-16-1 · Cited by 191
Gert, B., Culver, C. M., & Clouser, K. D. (2006) · doi:10.1093/0195159063.001.0001 · Cited by 189
Depression and decision-making capacity for treatment or research: a systematic review
Hindmarch, T., Hotopf, M., & Owen, G. S. (2013) · BMC Medical Ethics · doi:10.1186/1472-6939-14-54 · Cited by 178
Depression, competence, and the right to refuse lifesaving medical treatment
Sullivan, M. D., & Youngner, S. J. (1994) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.151.7.971 · Cited by 180
Dependence and Autonomy in Old Age
Agich, G. J. (2003) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511545801 · Cited by 246
Actively involving people with dementia in qualitative research
McKeown, J., Clarke, A., Ingleton, C., & Repper, J. (2010) · Journal of Clinical Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03136.x · Cited by 179
Stimulating brains, altering minds
Glannon, W. (2009) · Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.1136/jme.2008.027789 · Cited by 165
Scholten, M., & Gather, J. (2017) · Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.1136/medethics-2017-104414 · Cited by 134
Fairhill Guidelines on Ethics of the Care of People With Alzheimer's Disease: A Clinical Summary*
Post, S. G., & Whitehouse, P. J. (1995) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.1995.tb06625.x · Cited by 125
Supported Decision Making With People at the Margins of Autonomy
Peterson, A. H., Karlawish, J. H., & Largent, E. A. (2020) · The American Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.1080/15265161.2020.1863507 · Cited by 124
An Approach to Computing Ethics
Anderson, M., Anderson, S., & Armen, C. (2006) · IEEE Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1109/mis.2006.64 · Cited by 113
Breden, T. M., & Vollmann, J. (2004) · Health Care Analysis · doi:10.1007/s10728-004-6635-x · Cited by 111
The Not Unreasonable Standard for Assessment of Surrogates and Surrogate Decisions
Rhodes, R., & Holzman, I. R. (2004) · Metamedicine · doi:10.1007/s11017-004-3138-6 · Cited by 102
Revisiting the Best Interest Standard: Uses and Misuses
Diekema, D. S. (2011) · The Journal of Clinical Ethics · doi:10.1086/jce201122204 · Cited by 92
Harm is all you need? Best interests and disputes about parental decision-making
Birchley, G. (2015) · Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.1136/medethics-2015-102893 · Cited by 88
Conceptual Foundations of Antitrust
Black, O. (2005) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511494666 · Cited by 85
Bester, J. C. (2018) · The American Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.1080/15265161.2018.1485757 · Cited by 81
Scholten, M., Gather, J., & Vollmann, J. (2020) · The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine · doi:10.1093/jmp/jhaa030 · Cited by 82
Dreyer, A., Førde, R., & Nortvedt, P. (2009) · Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.1136/jme.2009.030668 · Cited by 80
How Proxies Make Decisions about Research for Patients with Alzheimer's Disease
Sugarman, J., Cain, C., Wallace, R., et al. (2001) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1046/j.1532-5415.2001.49218.x · Cited by 78
Medical ethics for children: applying the four principles to paediatrics
Baines, P. B. (2008) · Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.1136/jme.2006.018747 · Cited by 77
Better than Best (Interest Standard) in Pediatric Decision Making
Ross, L. F. (2019) · The Journal of Clinical Ethics · doi:10.1086/jce2019303183 · Cited by 75
Dunn, M., Clare, I. C. H., & Holland, A. J. (2009) · Journal of Intellectual Disability Research · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2788.2009.01228.x · Cited by 74
Person-oriented research ethics: integrating relational and everyday ethics in research
Cascio, M. A., & Racine, É. (2018) · Accountability in Research · doi:10.1080/08989621.2018.1442218 · Cited by 97
Nothing to be ashamed of: sex robots for older adults with disabilities
Jecker, N. S. (2020) · Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.1136/medethics-2020-106645 · Cited by 76
Inclusion: Is it stressful for teachers?
Forlin, C., Hattie, J., & Douglas, G. A. (1996) · Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability · doi:10.1080/13668259600033141 · Cited by 70
Ethical Issues in Newborn Sequencing Research: The Case Study of BabySeq
Ross, L. F., & Clayton, E. W. (2019) · PEDIATRICS · doi:10.1542/peds.2019-1031 · Cited by 60
Children and bioethics: clarifying consent and assent in medical and research settings
Spriggs, M. P. (2022) · British Medical Bulletin · doi:10.1093/bmb/ldac038 · Cited by 61
Caregivers’ preferences for the treatment of patients with Alzheimer’s disease
Karlawish, J. H., Klocinski, J., Merz, J. F., Clark, C. M., & Asch, D. A. (2000) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.55.7.1008 · Cited by 61
Proxy consent: moral authority misconceived
Wrigley, A. (2007) · Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.1136/jme.2006.019711 · Cited by 59
Comer, A. R., Hickman, S. E., Slaven, J. E., Monahan, P. O., Sachs, G. A., Wocial, L. D., Burke, E. S., & Torke, A. M. (2020) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.5179 · Cited by 57
A Conceptual and Moral Analysis of Suffering
Carnevale, F. A. (2009) · Nursing Ethics · doi:10.1177/0969733008100076 · Cited by 58
Scholten, M., Gieselmann, A., Gather, J., & Vollmann, J. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00631 · Cited by 56
Ethics of the algorithmic prediction of goal of care preferences: from theory to practice
Ferrario, A., Gloeckler, S., & Biller‐Andorno, N. (2022) · Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.1136/jme-2022-108371 · Cited by 54
Well-Being, Time, and Dementia
Hawkins, J. (2014) · Ethics · doi:10.1086/675365 · Cited by 54
What is the role and authority of gatekeepers in cluster randomized trials in health research?
Gallo, A., Weijer, C., White, A., Grimshaw, J., Boruch, R. F., Brehaut, J., Donner, A. P., Eccles, M., McRae, A. D., Saginur, R., et al. (2012) · Trials · doi:10.1186/1745-6215-13-116 · Cited by 61
Patient decision making competence: Outlines of a conceptual analysis
Welie, J. V. M., & Welie, S. P. K. (2001) · Medicine Health Care and Philosophy · doi:10.1023/a:1011441816143 · Cited by 53
Clark, G. L. (2007) · Contemporary Social Science · doi:10.1080/17450140601101200 · Cited by 48
Governing [through] Autonomy. The Moral and Legal Limits of “Soft Paternalism”
Fateh-Moghadam, B., & Gutmann, T. (2013) · Ethical Theory and Moral Practice · doi:10.1007/s10677-013-9450-3 · Cited by 51
Consent and assent in paediatric research in low-income settings
Cheah, P. Y., & Parker, M. J. (2014) · BMC Medical Ethics · doi:10.1186/1472-6939-15-22 · Cited by 51
Delivery Room Decision-Making for Extremely Preterm Infants in Sweden
Peerzada, J. M., Schollin, J., & Håkansson, S. (2006) · PEDIATRICS · doi:10.1542/peds.2005-1885 · Cited by 50
Advance directives in psychiatric care: a narrative approach
Widdershoven, G. A. M., & Berghmans, R. (2001) · Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.1136/jme.27.2.92 · Cited by 50
Dreyer, A., Førde, R., & Nortvedt, P. (2010) · Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.1136/jme.2010.036244 · Cited by 49
Assessing children’s competence to consent in research by a standardized tool: a validity study
Hein, I. M., Troost, P. W., Lindeboom, R., de Vries, M. C., Zwaan, C. M., & Lindauer, R. (2012) · BMC Pediatrics · doi:10.1186/1471-2431-12-156 · Cited by 48
Deciding for others: The ethics of surrogate decision‐making
Arnold, R. M., & Forrow, L. (1990) · Journal of Legal Medicine · doi:10.1080/01947649009510822 · Cited by 48
Fessler, D. M. T. (2003) · Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.1136/jme.29.4.243 · Cited by 48
Clarifying substituted judgement: the endorsed life approach
Phillips, J., & Wendler, D. S. (2014) · Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.1136/medethics-2013-101852 · Cited by 47
Phase 1 oncology trials and informed consent
Miller, F. G., & Joffe, S. (2012) · Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.1136/medethics-2012-100832 · Cited by 46
Devnani, R., Slaven, J. E., Bosslet, G. T., Montz, K., Inger, L., Burke, E. S., & Torke, A. M. (2017) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-017-4158-z · Cited by 46
Evaluation of Competency: Ethical Considerations for Neuropsychologists
Moberg, P. J., & Kniele, K. (2006) · Applied Neuropsychology · doi:10.1207/s15324826an1302_5 · Cited by 46
How do clinicians prepare family members for the role of surrogate decision-maker?
Cunningham, T. V., Scheunemann, L. P., Arnold, R. M., & White, D. (2018) · Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.1136/medethics-2016-103808 · Cited by 45
Precedent Autonomy and Subsequent Consent
Davis, J. K. (2004) · Ethical Theory and Moral Practice · doi:10.1023/b:etta.0000042908.13784.00 · Cited by 44
Moran‐Ellis, J., & Tisdall, E. K. M. (2019) · Global Studies of Childhood · doi:10.1177/2043610619860995 · Cited by 47
Hein, I. M., Troost, P. W., Lindeboom, R., Christiaans, I., Grisso, T., van Goudoever, J. B., & Lindauer, R. (2015) · Journal of Genetic Counseling · doi:10.1007/s10897-015-9835-7 · Cited by 41
Beyond competence: advance directives in dementia research
Jongsma, K. R., & van de Vathorst, S. (2015) · Bioethics News · doi:10.1007/s40592-015-0034-y · Cited by 40
The theorisation of ‘best interests’ in bioethical accounts of decision-making
Birchley, G. (2021) · BMC Medical Ethics · doi:10.1186/s12910-021-00636-0 · Cited by 45
Effects of Visual Aids for End-of-Life Care on Decisional Capacity of People With Dementia
Chang, W.-Z. D., & Bourgeois, M. S. (2019) · American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology · doi:10.1044/2019_ajslp-19-0028 · Cited by 39
Torke, A. M., Sachs, G. A., Helft, P. R., et al. (2011) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03480.x · Cited by 39
Medical expertise, existential suffering and ending life
Varelius, J. (2013) · Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.1136/medethics-2012-100812 · Cited by 38
The Challenge of Obtaining Quality Care: Limited Consumer Sovereignty in Human Services
Eika, K. H. (2008) · Feminist Economics · doi:10.1080/13545700802446658 · Cited by 38
The Birth of Tragedy in Pediatrics: a Phronetic Conception of Bioethics
Carnevale, F. A. (2007) · Nursing Ethics · doi:10.1177/0969733007080203 · Cited by 38
Physician‐Assisted Death and Severe, Treatment‐Resistant Depression
Steinbock, B. (2017) · Hastings Center Report · doi:10.1002/hast.768 · Cited by 36
“What the patient would have decided”: A fundamental problem with the substituted judgment standard
Broström, L., Johansson, M., & Nielsen, M. K. (2006) · Medicine Health Care and Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s11019-006-9042-2 · Cited by 36
Cognitive enhancement in children and adolescents: Is it in their best interests?
Gaucher, N. O., Payot, A., & Racine, É. (2013) · Acta Paediatrica · doi:10.1111/apa.12409 · Cited by 35
Brain-computer interfaces in end-of-life decision-making
Glannon, W. (2016) · Brain-Computer Interfaces · doi:10.1080/2326263x.2016.1207496 · Cited by 35
Affect, Values and Problems Assessing Decision-Making Capacity
Hawkins, J. (2023) · The American Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.1080/15265161.2023.2224273 · Cited by 34
White, S. (2004) · Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.1136/jme.2002.001610 · Cited by 33
Do we need a threshold conception of competence?
den Hartogh, G. (2015) · Medicine Health Care and Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s11019-015-9646-5 · Cited by 32
Wendler, D. S., Wesley, B., Pavlick, M., & Rid, A. (2016) · Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.1136/medethics-2015-103001 · Cited by 32
Medical Decision-Making in Oncology for Patients Lacking Capacity
Marron, J. M., Kyi, K., Appelbaum, P. S., & Magnuson, A. M. (2020) · American Society of Clinical Oncology Educational Book · doi:10.1200/edbk_280279 · Cited by 32
Physicians' Views on the Importance of Patient Preferences in Surrogate Decision‐Making
Torke, A. M., Moloney, R., Siegler, M. A., et al. (2010) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.02720.x · Cited by 32
der Schmitten, J. I., Rothärmel, S., Mellert, C., Rixen, S., Hammes, B. J., Briggs, L. A., Wegscheider, K., & Marckmann, G. (2011) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/1472-6963-11-14 · Cited by 32
Salter, E. K. (2017) · Hastings Center Report · doi:10.1002/hast.666 · Cited by 34
Mercurio, M. R. (2006) · Journal of Perinatology · doi:10.1038/sj.jp.7211547 · Cited by 31
Wishard Volunteer Advocates Program: An Intervention for At‐Risk, Incapacitated, Unbefriended Adults
Bandy, R. J., Sachs, G. A., Montz, K., Inger, L., Bandy, R. W., & Torke, A. M. (2014) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/jgs.13096 · Cited by 31
Jox, R. J., Michalowski, S., Lorenz, J., et al. (2007) · Medicine Health Care and Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s11019-007-9112-0 · Cited by 31
Assessing Decision-Making Capacity in the Setting of Palliative Care Research
Casarett, D. (2003) · Journal of Pain and Symptom Management · doi:10.1016/s0885-3924(03)00097-6 · Cited by 31
Giving Consent to the Ineffable
Villiger, D. (2024) · Neuroethics · doi:10.1007/s12152-024-09545-6 · Cited by 32
A mixed methods investigation of end-of-life surrogate decisions among older adults
Batteux, E., Ferguson, E., & Tunney, R. J. (2020) · BMC Palliative Care · doi:10.1186/s12904-020-00553-w · Cited by 31
The Theory and Practice of Surrogate Decision‐Making
Wendler, D. S. (2017) · The Hastings Center Report · doi:10.1002/hast.671 · Cited by 30
Advance Directives and Dementia
Berghmans, R. (2000) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2000.tb05165.x · Cited by 30
Mackenzie, R., & Watts, J. (2011) · AJOB Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/21507740.2011.580491 · Cited by 31
Horn, R. (2014) · Medicine Health Care and Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s11019-014-9558-9 · Cited by 29
Interests and Neonates: There Is More to the Story than We Explicitly Acknowledge
Hester, D. M. (2007) · Metamedicine · doi:10.1007/s11017-007-9048-7 · Cited by 28
Best interests, dementia and the Mental Capacity Act (2005)
Hope, T., Slowther, A., & Eccles, J. (2009) · Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.1136/jme.2009.030783 · Cited by 28
Green bioethics, patient autonomy and informed consent in healthcare
Resnik, D. B., & Pugh, J. (2023) · Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.1136/jme-2023-109404 · Cited by 27
How are children’s best interests expressed during their hospital visit?—An observational study
Quaye, A. A., Castor, C., Coyne, I., Söderbäck, M., & Hallström, I. (2021) · Journal of Clinical Nursing · doi:10.1111/jocn.15886 · Cited by 33
Authenticity and psychiatric disorder: does autonomy of personal preferences matter
Sjöstrand, M., & Juth, N. (2014) · Medicine Health Care and Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s11019-013-9509-x · Cited by 26
Religion and Spirituality in Surrogate Decision Making for Hospitalized Older Adults
Geros-Willfond, K. N., Ivy, S. S., Montz, K., Bohan, S. E., & Torke, A. M. (2015) · Journal of Religion and Health · doi:10.1007/s10943-015-0111-9 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Buchanan, A. E., & Brock, D. W.
- Affiliations
- University of Arizona (US)
- Brown University (US)
- Venue
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 1990-01-26
- OpenAlex
- W4241880035
- Cited by
- 516
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 4.34
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
- Keywords
- surrogate decision-making, competence, advance directives, minors, elderly patients, psychiatric patients, treatment decision-making, bioethics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review