The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Speech Acts
Abstract
Written in an outstandingly clear and lively style, this 1969 book provokes its readers to rethink issues they may have regarded as long since settled.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“We take a different approach by regarding talk as a type of action with potential to instigate further activities over time (Austin, 1962;Searle, 1969; see also Gond, Cabantous, Harding, & Learmonth, 2015).”
From Timely hypocrisy? Hypocrisy temporalities in CSR communication (2020) · cites this paper as Searle, 1969
In the citing paper
“Some acts consist precisely in saying something, for instance declaring, promising, warning, inviting and congratulating (Austin, 1962;Searle, 1969).”
From Timely hypocrisy? Hypocrisy temporalities in CSR communication (2020) · cites this paper as Searle, 1969
In the citing paper
“Hereby, he disregards situations in which talk drives action (Austin, 1962;Gond et al., 2015;Searle, 1969).”
From Timely hypocrisy? Hypocrisy temporalities in CSR communication (2020) · cites this paper as Searle, 1969
In the citing paper
“Mann's study concludes that Eve's speeches are illocutionary acts (that is, actions carried out through speech) with a declarative, assertive, and performative force on two levels: the story level and the storyteller level.”
From Reframing Genesis 3:16: Eve’s Creation Memoir (2024) · cites this paper as Searle 1969
In the citing paper
“Searle ' s schematism appears to be the best known and most widely applied, even if it is still occasionally contested.”
From Studies in dhāraṇī literature II: Pragmatics of dhāraṇī s (2014) · cites this paper as Searle 1969
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 10,101–10,200 of 11,727
(2019) · Studies in language companion series · doi:10.1075/slcs.208.01
Appendix A. The transcription conventions
(2021) · Studies in Chinese language and discourse · doi:10.1075/scld.14.app1
The many shades and shapes of transaction
(2021) · Studies in Chinese language and discourse · doi:10.1075/scld.14.c4
Language and social interaction in Southern Chinese marketplace
(2021) · Studies in Chinese language and discourse · doi:10.1075/scld.14.c1
(2021) · Studies in Chinese language and discourse · doi:10.1075/scld.14.prelim
(2021) · Studies in Chinese language and discourse · doi:10.1075/scld.14.toc
(2021) · Studies in Chinese language and discourse · doi:10.1075/scld.14.pre
(2016) · Studies in Chinese language and discourse · doi:10.1075/scld.6.app
(2016) · Studies in Chinese language and discourse · doi:10.1075/scld.6.ni
(2016) · Studies in Chinese language and discourse · doi:10.1075/scld.6.si
Relationships in the marketplace
(2021) · Studies in Chinese language and discourse · doi:10.1075/scld.14.c7
The research context, methodology and theoretical preliminaries
(2021) · Studies in Chinese language and discourse · doi:10.1075/scld.14.c2
(2021) · Studies in Chinese language and discourse · doi:10.1075/scld.14.c8
(2016) · Studies in Chinese language and discourse · doi:10.1075/scld.6.prelim
(2016) · Studies in Chinese language and discourse · doi:10.1075/scld.6.ack
Language as a transaction cost
(2021) · Studies in Chinese language and discourse · doi:10.1075/scld.14.c9
(2016) · Studies in Chinese language and discourse · doi:10.1075/scld.6.refs
(2016) · Studies in Chinese language and discourse · doi:10.1075/scld.6.toc
(2021) · Studies in Chinese language and discourse · doi:10.1075/scld.14.app2
(2016) · Studies in Chinese language and discourse · doi:10.1075/scld.6.abb
(2016) · Studies in Chinese language and discourse · doi:10.1075/scld.6.log
(2016) · Studies in Chinese language and discourse · doi:10.1075/scld.6.c1
(2021) · Studies in Chinese language and discourse · doi:10.1075/scld.14.c5
(2016) · Studies in Chinese language and discourse · doi:10.1075/scld.6.lot
(2021) · Studies in Chinese language and discourse · doi:10.1075/scld.14.c6
(2021) · Studies in Chinese language and discourse · doi:10.1075/scld.14.ref
(2021) · Studies in Chinese language and discourse · doi:10.1075/scld.14.c3
(2021) · Studies in Chinese language and discourse · doi:10.1075/scld.14.ind
(2016) · Studies in Chinese language and discourse · doi:10.1075/scld.6.lof
(2016) · Studies in Chinese language and discourse · doi:10.1075/scld.6.c7
(2021) · Pragmatics & beyond. New series · doi:10.1075/pbns.322.c5
(2021) · Pragmatics & beyond. New series · doi:10.1075/pbns.322.ack
The manipulative evidentiality of implicit communication
(2021) · Pragmatics & beyond. New series · doi:10.1075/pbns.322.c3
Features and functions of implicitness in verbal communication
(2021) · Pragmatics & beyond. New series · doi:10.1075/pbns.322.c1
(2021) · Pragmatics & beyond. New series · doi:10.1075/pbns.322.conclusion
(2021) · Pragmatics & beyond. New series · doi:10.1075/pbns.322.lof
(2021) · Pragmatics & beyond. New series · doi:10.1075/pbns.322.prelim
(2021) · Pragmatics & beyond. New series · doi:10.1075/pbns.322.intro
Teaching how to detect manipulative language
(2021) · Pragmatics & beyond. New series · doi:10.1075/pbns.322.c6
Dimensiones y fuerzas de los enunciados probatorios
Rodríguez, R. L. (2024) · Problema Anuario de Filosofía y Teoría del Derecho · doi:10.22201/iij.24487937e.2025.19.18724
(2021) · Pragmatics & beyond. New series · doi:10.1075/pbns.322.index
Quantitative and experimental approaches to implicit and manipulative communication
(2021) · Pragmatics & beyond. New series · doi:10.1075/pbns.322.c2
(2021) · Pragmatics & beyond. New series · doi:10.1075/pbns.322.ref
(2021) · Pragmatics & beyond. New series · doi:10.1075/pbns.322.lot
(2021) · Pragmatics & beyond. New series · doi:10.1075/pbns.322.toc
The idea that texts are unitary objects
(2017) · FILLM studies in languages and literatures · doi:10.1075/fillm.7.c9
(2017) · FILLM studies in languages and literatures · doi:10.1075/fillm.7.refs
(2017) · FILLM studies in languages and literatures · doi:10.1075/fillm.7.ed-preface
Exemplars of texts and complexes of signs
(2017) · FILLM studies in languages and literatures · doi:10.1075/fillm.7.c2
(2017) · FILLM studies in languages and literatures · doi:10.1075/fillm.7.prelim
(2017) · FILLM studies in languages and literatures · doi:10.1075/fillm.7.index
Text and textual meaning as conceived by standard literary theory
(2017) · FILLM studies in languages and literatures · doi:10.1075/fillm.7.c8
Analytic-aesthetic views of textual meaning
(2017) · FILLM studies in languages and literatures · doi:10.1075/fillm.7.c7
The ordinary conception of a text and the cluster conception
(2017) · FILLM studies in languages and literatures · doi:10.1075/fillm.7.c1
(2017) · FILLM studies in languages and literatures · doi:10.1075/fillm.7.c5
Conclusion. An informal summary
(2017) · FILLM studies in languages and literatures · doi:10.1075/fillm.7.conclusion
The standard linguistic perspective on text and textual meaning
(2017) · FILLM studies in languages and literatures · doi:10.1075/fillm.7.c6
A news story and a work of electronic literature
(2017) · FILLM studies in languages and literatures · doi:10.1075/fillm.7.c4
(2017) · FILLM studies in languages and literatures · doi:10.1075/fillm.7.toc
(2017) · FILLM studies in languages and literatures · doi:10.1075/fillm.7.c3
(2017) · FILLM studies in languages and literatures · doi:10.1075/fillm.7.pre
Introduction. A theory of text and textual meaning
(2017) · FILLM studies in languages and literatures · doi:10.1075/fillm.7.intro
(2017) · FILLM studies in languages and literatures · doi:10.1075/fillm.7.lof
(2017) · Benjamins translation library · doi:10.1075/btl.137.toc
(2017) · Benjamins translation library · doi:10.1075/btl.137.refs
(2017) · Benjamins translation library · doi:10.1075/btl.137.aut
(2017) · Benjamins translation library · doi:10.1075/btl.137.prelim
(2016) · FILLM studies in languages and literatures · doi:10.1075/fillm.4.preface
(2016) · Pragmatics & beyond. New series · doi:10.1075/pbns.265.toc
(2016) · Pragmatics & beyond. New series · doi:10.1075/pbns.265.07ref
(2016) · Pragmatics & beyond. New series · doi:10.1075/pbns.265.003lof
(2016) · Pragmatics & beyond. New series · doi:10.1075/pbns.265.002lot
(2016) · Pragmatics & beyond. New series · doi:10.1075/pbns.265.01int
(2016) · Pragmatics & beyond. New series · doi:10.1075/pbns.265.03met
(2016) · Pragmatics & beyond. New series · doi:10.1075/pbns.260.index
(2016) · Pragmatics & beyond. New series · doi:10.1075/pbns.260.glossary
(2016) · FILLM studies in languages and literatures · doi:10.1075/fillm.4.ack
(2016) · Benjamins translation library · doi:10.1075/btl.121.si
(2016) · Multilingualism and diversity management · doi:10.1075/mdm.4.prelim
(2016) · FILLM studies in languages and literatures · doi:10.1075/fillm.4.06ch6
(2016) · Multilingualism and diversity management · doi:10.1075/mdm.4.toc
(2016) · Benjamins translation library · doi:10.1075/btl.121.ni
(2016) · Pragmatics & beyond. New series · doi:10.1075/pbns.260.11ref
(2016) · Pragmatics & beyond. New series · doi:10.1075/pbns.260.001ack
(2016) · Pragmatics & beyond. New series · doi:10.1075/pbns.260.toc
(2016) · Pragmatics & beyond. New series · doi:10.1075/pbns.260.prelim
(2016) · FILLM studies in languages and literatures · doi:10.1075/fillm.4.index
(2016) · Benjamins translation library · doi:10.1075/btl.121.01ch1
(2016) · Multilingualism and diversity management · doi:10.1075/mdm.4.tra
(2016) · FILLM studies in languages and literatures · doi:10.1075/fillm.4.05ch5
(2016) · Benjamins translation library · doi:10.1075/btl.121.lot
(2016) · FILLM studies in languages and literatures · doi:10.1075/fillm.4.refs
(2016) · FILLM studies in languages and literatures · doi:10.1075/fillm.4.prelim
(2016) · Benjamins translation library · doi:10.1075/btl.121.prelim
(2016) · Pragmatics & beyond. New series · doi:10.1075/pbns.265.06con
(2016) · Pragmatics & beyond. New series · doi:10.1075/pbns.265.001abb
(2016) · Benjamins translation library · doi:10.1075/btl.121.abb
(2016) · Pragmatics & beyond. New series · doi:10.1075/pbns.265.08app
(2016) · FILLM studies in languages and literatures · doi:10.1075/fillm.4.01ch1
(2016) · Multilingualism and diversity management · doi:10.1075/mdm.4.refs
Metadata
- Authors
- Searle, J. R.
- Corresponding author
- Searle, John R.
- Venue
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 1969-01-01
- OpenAlex
- W4235073904
- Semantic Scholar
- e42ba35bf478906fdce304c0f999f044e3c785d3
- Cited by
- 11,718
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 586 · 2025: 605 · 2024: 425 · 2023: 466 · 2022: 456 · 2021: 528 · 2020: 522 · 2019: 831 · 2018: 498 · 2017: 446 · 2016: 456 · 2015: 349 · 2014: 647 · 2013: 294 · 2012: 245
- FWCI
- 86.53
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- RCIN (Digital Repository of the Scientifics Institutes) (Institute of Archaeology and Ethnology of the Polish Academy of Sciences) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Linguistics and Discourse Analysis
- Keywords
- speech acts, pragmatics, utterance interpretation, illocutionary force, conversational meaning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
